Home AI News AI Brand Safety: Protecting Podcast Content Creators?

AI Brand Safety: Protecting Podcast Content Creators?

Updated on Jun 16,2025

Key Points
The State of Podcasting: A Free and Open Frontier?
The Pros and Cons of Brand Safety Tools
FAQ
Related Questions

The podcasting landscape, initially built on the principles of open access and decentralized creation, is facing new challenges. The rise of AI-powered 'brand safety' tools is raising concerns about potential censorship and limitations on creative freedom. This article dives deep into how these tools work, their impact on podcasters, and what the future might hold for this unique form of online content.

Key Points

Podcasting has traditionally been a free and open platform, decentralized and resistant to top-down control.

AI-powered brand safety analysis is emerging, flagging 'high-risk' speech in podcasts for advertisers.

Companies like Sounder, NewsGuard, and Barometer are launching brand safety tools for podcast advertising.

These tools assign 'trust scores' and suitability ratings, potentially impacting monetization for content creators.

Major podcast publishers and advertising platforms are partnering with brand safety companies.

Spotify's acquisition of Kinzen highlights the growing trend of AI-driven content policing in podcasting.

Apple Podcasts may be losing market share to Spotify due to differing moderation policies.

The rise of closed platforms and AI censorship threatens the open nature of podcasting.

The State of Podcasting: A Free and Open Frontier?

The Decentralized Roots of Podcasting

Since its inception in 2003 , podcasting has largely remained true to its original mission. Unlike many other forms of online content, podcasting has resisted centralization and control by tech giants. This freedom is primarily due to its reliance on RSS (Really Simple Syndication) feeds, an open and decentralized technology that allows creators to connect directly with their audience.

This decentralized setup has largely shielded podcasting from the deplatforming, demonetization, and algorithmic throttling that have become prevalent on other big tech platforms.

The very essence of podcasting is its accessibility. Anyone with a microphone and an internet connection can create and distribute their content, bypassing traditional gatekeepers. This has fostered a diverse ecosystem of voices and perspectives, enriching the online landscape with niche topics and independent creators.

Key takeaway: The strength of podcasting lies in its decentralized structure, using RSS feeds to connect creators directly with listeners.

The Threat of Centralization: Tech Giants and Content Control

However, the tide may be turning. As podcasting has grown in popularity, major media outlets, and tech giants are increasingly interested in exerting control over the medium. This interest Stems from the lucrative potential of Podcast Advertising, which is projected to continue its rapid growth in the coming years.

The danger lies in the potential for these companies to impose top-down censorship systems on podcasting, mirroring the content moderation policies seen on platforms like YouTube and Facebook.

One of the primary concerns is the erosion of creative freedom. If podcasters are forced to adhere to strict content guidelines to avoid demonetization or deplatforming, they may self-censor or avoid discussing controversial topics. This could stifle independent voices and limit the diversity of content available to listeners. In effect, podcasting could lose what makes it unique and valuable.

Key takeaway: The increased focus from major media outlets bring in the threat of censorship and control.

The Pros and Cons of Brand Safety Tools

👍 Pros

Protects brand reputation by preventing ads from appearing alongside inappropriate content.

Provides advertisers with greater control over where their ads are displayed.

Offers podcast platforms a way to attract advertisers who are concerned about brand safety.

Ensuring they always have the most contextually relevant insights for your audio content.

👎 Cons

May lead to over-censorship and suppression of legitimate content.

Risk of bias and discrimination in content moderation decisions.

Potential for chilling effect on creative expression and freedom of speech.

Reduces diversity of content available to listeners.

Can be costly and time-consuming to implement effectively.

Limits advertisers confidently buy audio ad inventory

FAQ

What is AI-powered brand safety analysis?

AI-powered brand safety analysis is the process of using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms to automatically scan and analyze digital content, such as text, audio, and video, to identify potential risks to a brand's reputation or image. The goal is to ensure that a brand's advertising or content is not displayed alongside inappropriate, offensive, or harmful content that could damage its reputation or alienate customers. For podcasts, this can be harmful. As the definition of what is ‘harmful’ is subjective, content creators might censor what they are saying in fear of it being flagged.

Why is Apple Podcasts losing its market share?

A major reason why Apple Podcasts is losing its market share is because they have different approaches to content moderation than other podcast platforms like Spotify. As a result, a lot of the users are beginning to use Spotify for podcasts instead.