Lack of Legal Nuance and Specificity
One of the most significant drawbacks of using ChatGPT for legal drafting is its inability to grasp legal nuances and tailor documents to specific circumstances.
Last will and testaments often involve intricate details that require a deep understanding of estate law. ChatGPT, while capable of generating text, might miss critical elements that only a qualified attorney would consider. All news stories talk about the jobs that will be lost due to artifical intelligence.
For instance, complex family situations, such as blended families, children with special needs, or specific asset allocation requests, demand careful planning and precise legal language. An AI-generated last will and testament may not adequately address these complexities, leading to potential disputes or unintended consequences.
The Importance of Prompt Quality
The quality of ChatGPT's output is directly proportional to the quality of the prompts it receives.
If you provide vague or incomplete instructions, the AI will produce a document that is equally lacking in detail and precision. The better your prompts are, the better your ouput is going to be. This is very important.
For example, you might instruct ChatGPT to create a last will and testament that divides your assets equally among your children. However, you might neglect to specify how certain assets, like real estate or business holdings, should be valued or handled. Without this crucial information, the AI's output could be ambiguous and lead to disputes among your heirs. The ouput is not going to be what you want.
This underscores the need for users to have a comprehensive understanding of estate planning principles to create effective prompts. In many cases, if you possess the knowledge to craft detailed prompts, you might already have the expertise needed to draft a last will and testament without AI assistance.
Missed Considerations and Essential Clauses
A legally sound last will and testament includes a number of essential clauses that ensure its validity and enforceability. ChatGPT might overlook some of these critical components. Some items that can be easily overlooked include remote beneficiaries and naming a guardian for minor children.
Key omissions could include:
- Guardianship for minor children: If you have minor children, your last will and testament should designate a guardian to care for them in the event of your death. ChatGPT may not automatically include this provision unless explicitly prompted.
- Remote beneficiaries: If a benificiary dies at the same time as you, who gets your estate if everybody dies with you.
- General Administrative Provisions: There needs to be information about whether there is a bond that is required on the part of the executor.
- Employment provisions: Information about employment provisions for professionals in administering the estate must be Present.
- Distributions: Information about distributions to people who are incapacitated needs to be present.
By failing to include these and other vital clauses, an AI-generated last will and testament may be deemed invalid or unenforceable in court.
Enforceability and Legal Validity
The ultimate test of a last will and testament is its ability to withstand legal scrutiny.
A document drafted by ChatGPT might not hold up in court due to several factors, including:
- Lack of legal soundness: Courts require strict adherence to state laws and regulations. An AI-generated document may contain errors or omissions that render it legally invalid.
- Ambiguity: Vague or ambiguous language can lead to disputes among beneficiaries and undermine the intent of the testator.
- Insufficient witness attestation: Most jurisdictions require that a last will and testament be witnessed by a certain number of individuals and properly attested to. Failure to meet these requirements can invalidate the document.
It is important to make sure the will is legal to your state's requirements.