OpenAI o1: Unveiling the Deep Thinking AI Model

Updated on Jun 22,2025

The world of artificial intelligence is constantly evolving, with new models emerging at a rapid pace. Recently, OpenAI unveiled its latest creation: o1. Described as a deep thinking or reasoning model, o1 promises to obliterate past benchmarks in various fields, including mathematics, coding, and even Ph.D.-level science. But how does o1 work, and is it truly as revolutionary as it seems? This blog post dives deep into the details, separating hype from reality and exploring the potential implications of this new AI model.

Key Points

OpenAI's o1 is a new AI model designed for deep thinking and reasoning, outperforming previous models in benchmarks.

o1 excels in math, coding, and Ph.D.-level science, showcasing significant accuracy gains.

OpenAI is secretly collaborating with Cognition Labs and their AI programmer 'Devin' to enhance 'Devin's' abilities through 'o1'.

Unlike earlier models, 'o1' models use reinforcement learning to navigate complex problem-solving.

The 'o1' utilizes a 'chain-of-thought' process, generating reasoning tokens to reach conclusions.

Despite advancements, o1 may suffer from hallucinations and issues with UI-integration.

Although possessing potential, 'o1' is likely being over-hyped by OpenAI to generate more investors in a competitive AI landscape.

The chain of thought method with reinforcement learning, while improving accuracy, increases processing time and computing costs.

Understanding OpenAI's o1

What is OpenAI o1?

OpenAI's o1 isn't just another run-of-the-mill language model. It's a significant step toward deep thinking AI, also known as reasoning models. While earlier iterations focused on generative capabilities, o1 aims to tackle more complex problems requiring logical deduction and critical analysis. OpenAI positions o1 as a paradigm shift, capable of surpassing existing benchmarks in areas that have traditionally been challenging for AI.

This model builds upon the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) architecture. However, 'o1' prioritizes reasoning and strategic thought before delivering an output. Its design focuses on advanced analytical skills across multiple fields. o1 has made waves within the tech community because it is expected to have an enormous effect on all past forms of AI.

Key aspects of o1 include:

  • Deep Thinking: o1 attempts to emulate human-like reasoning to solve intricate problems more effectively.
  • Benchmark Performance: It outperforms previous models in mathematics, coding, science, and various other benchmarks.
  • Advanced Reasoning: It offers complex logic and problem-solving.

The o1's development may signify a broader shift in AI development. AI can now accomplish complicated logic and problem solving.

o1's Performance Across Different Benchmarks

The claims surrounding o1's capabilities are bold, with OpenAI suggesting it surpasses existing models in key areas. Let's examine some of the specific benchmarks where o1 demonstrates its prowess:

  • Mathematics: o1 shows improvements in mathematical tasks, suggesting a leap forward in AI's ability to handle complex calculations and problem-solving.
  • Coding: Improvements in coding benchmarks could mean o1 can generate more efficient code than the traditional models.
  • Ph.D.-Level Science: o1 has demonstrated an impressive performance on Ph.D. science questions, showcasing advanced capabilities in complex scientific reasoning. It notably improved to 92.8% pass accuracy in physics questions. It also had improvements in chemistry and biology.

The following table summarizes improvements from GPT-4o:

Category GPT-4o (%) o1 Improvement (%) % Change
MATH-500 60.3 94.8 +57.21%
MathVista 63.8 73.2 +14.73%
MMLU 69.1 78.1 +13.02%
MMMU 88.0 92.3 +4.89%
Chemistry 40.2 64.7 +60.95%
Physics 59.5 92.8 +55.97%
Biology 61.6 69.2 +12.34%
AP English Lang 52.0 64.0 +23.08%
AP English Lit 68.7 69.0 +0.44%
AP Physics 2 69.0 89.0 +28.99%
AP Calculus 71.3 85.2 +19.49%
AP Chemistry 83.0 93.0 +12.05%
LSAT 87.8 98.9 +12.64%
SAT EBRW 91.3 93.8 +2.74%
SAT Math 100.0 100.0 0.00%
Global Facts 65.1 78.4 +20.43%
College Chemistry 68.9 78.1 +13.35%
College Mathematics 75.2 98.1 +30.45%
Professional Law 75.6 85.0 +12.43%
Public Relations 76.8 80.7 +5.08%
Econometrics 78.8 87.1 +10.53%
Formal Logic 79.8 97.0 +21.55%
Moral Scenarios 80.3 85.8 +6.85%

While these results are compelling, it's important to view them with a critical eye. We'll explore some of the reasons for skepticism later in this post.

The Collaboration with Cognition Labs & Devin

A particularly interesting aspect of the o1 story is its connection to Cognition Labs and their AI programmer, Devin. Cognition Labs positions Devin as an AI capable of automating software engineering tasks. OpenAI secretly partnered with Cognition Labs to integrate o1's improved performance into Devin's existing architecture.

Devin’s coding capabilities were improved to a rate of 75% with o1, a monumental rise in performance. Previously the coding rate with GPT-4o was only at 25.9%. This highlights 'o1's effect and impact on the software engineering landscape.

This collaboration sparks questions about the future of work in the software development industry. While it's unlikely that AI will completely replace human programmers anytime soon, o1-powered AI assistants like Devin could automate many repetitive tasks, allowing developers to focus on more complex and creative challenges.

Deep Dive into o1's Functionality

Chain-of-Thought and Reasoning Tokens

So, how does o1 actually achieve its improved performance? One key element is its reliance on a chain-of-thought process, coupled with the use of what are called reasoning tokens.

Unlike earlier AI models, o1 isn't designed to provide immediate answers. Instead, it generates a sequence of intermediate reasoning steps before arriving at a conclusion. This 'thinking' process involves generating and evaluating reasoning tokens – essentially, building blocks of logical deduction. It’s about being strategic and having the ability to Backtrack, or double-check, if the model has chosen the wrong pathway. This ensures that any mistakes can be addressed immediately.

This method allows o1 to:

  • Break down complex problems: o1 can divide complex inquiries into multiple steps, to better assess an answer.
  • Reduce Hallucinations: By carefully constructing its thought process, o1 can minimize inaccurate responses that plague other AI models. Instead of delivering a surface level answer, reasoning tokens and chain-of-thought processing provides a more accurate response.
  • Emulate human-like reasoning: By mirroring the way humans approach problem-solving, o1 can tackle challenges that require nuanced understanding and logical deduction.

Accessing and Using OpenAI's o1

Available Models: Mini and Preview

OpenAI offers different versions of o1, each with varying levels of access and capabilities. Currently, the most accessible versions for general users are o1-mini and o1-preview.

  • o1-mini: This is a smaller, more streamlined version of o1. It's designed to be faster and more efficient. If you are looking for a low cost option, that can still achieve great results, look no further than 'o1-mini'.
  • o1-preview: offers advanced reasoning capabilities. This model would be a better choice for solving more difficult logic challenges. This version is accessible for most users.

OpenAI has also hinted that the full version of o1 may require a more expensive subscription plan, indicating a tiered access structure based on user needs and budget. The pricing for the premium plan may cost up to $2,000.00 a month.

Putting o1 to the Test

While OpenAI provides examples of o1's capabilities, it's important to conduct your own experiments to understand the model's strengths and limitations. Here's a framework for testing o1:

  • Start with simple prompts: Begin by asking basic questions to get a feel for the model's response style and accuracy.
  • Gradually increase complexity: As you become more comfortable, introduce more complex tasks that require logical reasoning and problem-solving.
  • Compare o1's performance to other models: Pit o1 against existing AI models to see where it excels and where it falls short.
  • Evaluate the 'chain-of-thought: Analyze the reasoning tokens and intermediate steps generated by o1 to understand its problem-solving process.
  • Identify potential limitations: Look for instances where the model struggles to provide accurate or coherent responses.

Understanding o1's Pricing Structure

Token-Based Pricing

OpenAI's o1 operates on a token-based pricing system. This means you pay for the number of tokens (words or sub-words) processed by the model. Deep-thinking AI models use more tokens due to chain of thought processes.

The more detailed the process is, the more you will spend.

The pricing for 'o1' may increase in cost, depending on the model, so keep your eye out for updates and pricing changes.

Weighing the Potential: Pros and Cons of o1

👍 Pros

Significant gains in benchmark performance, particularly in math, coding, and science.

Enhanced reasoning capabilities through the chain-of-thought process.

Potential for automating complex tasks and augmenting human capabilities.

Chain-of-thought design reduces hallucinations from AI models.

Availability to the public creates an opportunity to experiment with complex AI reasoning.

👎 Cons

The chain-of-thought and reasoning token approach can be computationally intensive, increasing processing time and cost.

OpenAI's limited transparency makes it difficult to fully assess the model's true capabilities.

Despite improvements, the model may still be prone to errors and 'hallucinations.'

Chain-of-thought's reasoning is not available to view.

OpenAI could be over-hyping the success of 'o1' to create more investor confidence.

Limited improvements were made despite claims of benchmark-surpassing results.

Core Features

Reasoning Power

'o1' offers powerful complex reasoning, to assist with software coding, writing, and math/physics.

Reinforcement Learning

'o1' uses reinforcement learning to constantly grow and improve its skillset.

Use Cases

Math and Physics Tutor

Because 'o1' offers advanced reasoning in hard sciences, users can use 'o1' as a personal tutor to assist them with Homework or projects.

Automated Debugging

By utilizing 'Devin' and 'o1', engineers could have less debugging on their hands. Software companies can utilize this as a means to make employees more efficient.

FAQ

What is the 'chain-of-thought'?
The 'chain-of-thought' is how 'o1' arrives at answers. The artificial intelligence essentially builds different steps to arrive at a response. This allows the artificial intelligence to be more accurate in the process, and also make informed decisions if one pathway isn't correct.
Does 'o1' have better programming skills than other AI?
With Cognition Lab's 'Devin', the 'o1' model has made great improvements when it comes to writing and debugging software. Compared to older GPT-4o programs, the accuracy has increased a lot.

Related Questions

Is 'o1' the future of AI?
While 'o1' has shown great results, it doesn't necessarily mean it's the future of AI. As artificial intelligence continues to develop, scientists and engineers continue to make strides to find new ways to generate AI. Each new product or model is constantly being worked on or one-upped. This essentially implies, that what might seem like the best AI today, may not be best tomorrow.