Auditive VS Boxes.dev
Compare Auditive VS Boxes.dev, what is the difference between Auditive and Boxes.dev?
You may like
Summarize
Auditive summarize
Auditive is the only AI-powered third-party risk marketplace that empowers businesses and their vendors to complete third-party risk assessments in a fraction of the time and never repeat them.
Auditive Landing Page
Boxes.dev summarize
Cloud dev environments for agentic coding. Run each Claude Code or Codex chat on its own computer in the cloud, connect from mobile and desktop, and code from anywhere.
Boxes.dev Landing Page
Compare Details
Auditive details
| Categories | Other |
| Auditive Website | https://auditive.io?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | July 09 2024 |
| Auditive Pricing | -- |
Boxes.dev details
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, AI Code Assistant, AI Copilot, No-Code&Low-Code |
| Boxes.dev Website | https://boxes.dev?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | June 08 2026 |
| Boxes.dev Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Auditive?
Buyers can evaluate sellers by accessing their risk posture on the network. Sellers can promote their risk posture to prospects and customers. Schedule a demo to see the platform in action.
How to use Boxes.dev?
To use Boxes.dev, move your project codebase into a cloud devbox using the CLI command `dvb init`. The platform automatically scans your local dev environment and creates a setup plan. Once approved, a coding agent recreates your dev environment in the cloud. You can then fork the primary VM to run tasks on their own machines, start Codex or Claude Code, and review, steer, or ship code from mobile, desktop, or CLI surfaces.
Compare Pros between Auditive and Boxes.dev
Core features of Auditive
- AI-powered risk assessments
- Continuous monitoring
- Automated review processes
- Network for buyers and sellers
Core features of Boxes.dev
- Full cloud computer per agent with isolated filesystem, services, and database state
- Instant snapshots and forks for running multiple agents in parallel
- Persistent terminal sessions and continuous background execution when offline
- Multi-surface control supporting macOS desktop, iOS/Android mobile, and scriptable CLI
- Localhost port forwarding that automatically follows the selected fork
- Cloud scheduled and webhook automation triggers (e.g., via Slack or Linear)
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Auditive
- Streamline security reviews for buyers and sellers
- Automate vendor risk management
- Build trust with customers through transparent security posture
Use cases for Boxes.dev
- Running multiple Claude Code or Codex tasks simultaneously on separate virtual machines
- Leaving complex coding agent tasks running overnight or while traveling without keeping a laptop open
- Reviewing agent threads, diffs, and approving or steering code changes directly from a smartphone
- Automating regular codebase tasks like weekly dependency audits triggered on a schedule
Different Plan between Auditive and Boxes.dev
Auditive
Free
For organizations who are just getting started. Includes Public Trust Page, Unlimited users, SSO with Google, Most security frameworks, One free AI-powered security review
From $800/month
For Sales and Revenue teams. Includes Everything in the free plan, SSO with SAML and Okta, Access to Shared Assessments SIG, Trust Page categories, AI security reviews, AI and integration to automatically build your Trust Page
From $2,500/month
For Risk Management teams evaluating up to 50 vendors. Includes Everything in the growth plan, Unlimited profile categories, Unlimited AI security reviews, Customizable vendor Risk Tiers, Auto-review of vendor security risk powered by AI, Customizable vendor risk insights across all security docs
Contact us
For Risk Management teams evaluating more than 50 vendors. Includes Everything in the Professional plan, White glove onboarding, Professional review of your TPRM program
Boxes.dev
$0 / free
10 free box-hours, Main devbox + 2 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Bring your own Codex + Claude Code, Desktop, mobile, web, CLI
$19 / user / mo
40 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 4 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.75 / box-hour, Email support
$99 / user / mo
250 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 10 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.60 / box-hour, Priority support
Custom volume
Custom seat & box-hour pools, SSO, SCIM, RBAC, Audit logs and spend controls, Dedicated resources & deployment, Custom MSA, security review
Auditive's traffic
Auditive is the one with 1.0K monthly visits and 00:00:59 Avg.visit duration. Auditive has a Page per visit of 2.06 and a bounce rate of 31.67%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 1.0K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:59 |
| Page per Visit | 2.06 |
| Bounce Rate | 31.67% |
Boxes.dev's traffic
Boxes.dev is the one with 0 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. Boxes.dev has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 0 |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
| Page per Visit | 0.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
Geography
The top 3 countries/regions for Auditive are:United States 57.33%, South Africa 33.08%, India 9.59%
Top 3 Countries/regions
 | 57.33% |
 | 33.08% |
 | 9.59% |
Geography
Sorry, there are no data
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Auditive are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Boxes.dev are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Which is better: Auditive or Boxes.dev?
Auditive might be a bit more popular than Boxes.dev.As you can see, Auditive has 1.0K monthly visits, while Boxes.dev has 0 monthly visits. So more people choose Auditive. So the odds are that people will recommend Auditive more on social platforms.
Auditive has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:59, while Boxes.dev has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00. Also, Auditive has a page per visit of 2.06 and a Bounce Rate of 31.67%. Boxes.dev has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%.
The main users of Auditive are United States, South Africa, India, with the following distribution: 57.33%, 33.08%, 9.59%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
