Xeon E5 2687Wv4 vs E5 2678v3: Performance Comparison and Price Analysis

Find AI Tools
No difficulty
No complicated process
Find ai tools

Xeon E5 2687Wv4 vs E5 2678v3: Performance Comparison and Price Analysis

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. testing the Xeon v4 Processors on LGA2011-3 Socket
    1. Background on Xeon v3 Series on LGA2011-3
    2. Introduction to Xeon E5 2687Wv4 Processor
    3. Price Comparison of Xeon Processors
  3. Technical Specifications of Xeon Processors
    1. Comparison of E5 2678v3 and E5 2687Wv4
    2. Architecture and Manufacturing Processes
    3. Core and Thread Counts
    4. Frequency Potentials and Boosting
    5. Cache Memory and TDP Levels
    6. Memory Support and Speed
    7. Additional Features of Broadwell-EP Architecture
  4. Performance Comparison: Xeon v3 vs. v4 Series
    1. AIDA64 Test Results: RAM and Cache Speeds
    2. CPU Queen Benchmark
    3. Cinebench R15 and R20 Benchmarks
    4. CPU-Z Benchmark
    5. WinRar and 7-Zip Benchmarks
    6. RealBench 2.43 Performance
    7. Adobe Lightroom 2019 Performance
    8. Adobe Premiere Pro 2020 Performance
    9. 3DMark Fire Strike and Time Spy Benchmarks
    10. Gaming Performance: Assassin's Creed Odyssey, Battlefield V, Far Cry 5, Watch Dogs 2
  5. Conclusion
    1. Summary of Test Results
    2. Price-Performance Ratio Analysis
    3. Recommendations for Buying Xeon Processors
    4. Considerations for Heat and Power Consumption
    5. Final Thoughts

Testing the Performance of Xeon v4 Processors on LGA2011-3 Socket

The increasing interest in testing the performance of v4 series processors on the LGA2011-3 socket has sparked Curiosity among viewers of TechnoPlanet Channel. While the channel had extensively covered the Xeon v3 series on this socket, there remained a dearth of information on the Xeon v4 series. Thanks to a dedicated subscriber named Alexey, who had repeatedly provided testing components, the host now had the opportunity to explore the Xeon E5 2687Wv4 processor.

With a price starting from $1470 on AliExpress and going up to $1800 on eBay, the Xeon E5 2687Wv4 was an expensive piece of hardware. The host aimed to thoroughly test this processor and compare it with its v3 counterpart to assess the performance gains achieved with the updated Broadwell-EP architecture.

Technical Specifications of Xeon Processors

Before delving into the performance comparisons, let's examine the technical specifications of the Xeon E5 2678v3 and E5 2687Wv4 processors. Both processors feature 12 cores and 24 Threads. However, the base and boost frequencies, cache memory, TDP levels, and memory support differ between the two.

The E5 2678v3, released in the Second half of 2014, was built on the 22nm manufacturing process with Haswell-EP architecture. It had a base frequency of 2.9GHz, which could be boosted to 3.3GHz with unlockable turbo boost. The processor supported DDR3 memory and featured a 30MB L3 cache. In contrast, the E5 2687Wv4, introduced in early 2016, was manufactured using the 14nm process with Broadwell-EP architecture. It had a base frequency of 3.2GHz and could not be unlocked for turbo boosting. The processor only supported DDR4 memory but offered a higher maximum memory multiplier of 2400MHz. The L3 cache size remained the same at 30MB.

Performance Comparison: Xeon v3 vs. v4 Series

To assess the performance gains achieved with the transition from the v3 to v4 series, multiple benchmarks and tests were conducted. In terms of memory performance, the Xeon E5 2687Wv4 showcased significant improvements due to its support for higher memory speeds. Notably, the write speed of the RAM was noticeably higher in the v4 series.

In CPU benchmarks such as CPU Queen, Cinebench R15, and Cinebench R20, the E5 2678v3 exhibited a slight advantage over the E5 2687Wv4 in single-core performance. However, when it came to multi-core performance, the v4 series processors offered a slight edge.

In real-world applications like Adobe Lightroom 2019 and Adobe Premiere Pro 2020, the performance differences between the processors were minimal. The E5 2678v3 even outperformed the E5 2687Wv4 in some tests. The gaming performance of the processors was also comparable, with only slight variations observed in different games.

Conclusion

Based on the test results, the Xeon E5 2687Wv4 demonstrated a performance advantage of around 3-4% over the E5 2678v3 in various professional tasks. However, considering the 15-fold price difference between the two processors, it can be concluded that the overall performance gain from v3 to v4 series is not substantial.

In gaming scenarios, the differences in performance were negligible, with the E5 2687Wv4 occasionally falling slightly behind its counterpart. With such minimal improvements and significant price disparities, it is recommended to opt for the more cost-effective Xeon v3 series processors.

It is worth noting that Xeon v4 processors offer better energy efficiency and lower power consumption, which makes them suitable for budget-friendly motherboard options and mitigates the risk of VRM zone overheating.

In conclusion, the Xeon v4 series processors do not provide substantial performance gains over their v3 counterparts on LGA2011-3 socket. Therefore, it is advisable to consider purchasing the v3 series processors, as they offer similar performance at a significantly lower cost.

👍 Pros:

  • Improved memory performance in the v4 series
  • Energy-efficient and lower power consumption of v4 processors
  • Comparable performance in gaming scenarios

👎 Cons:

  • Limited performance gains from v3 to v4 series processors
  • Significant price difference between v3 and v4 series processors

Highlights

  • The Xeon E5 2687Wv4 processor demonstrates a modest performance advantage of around 3-4% over the E5 2678v3 in professional tasks.
  • The gaming performance of the processors is comparable, with only slight variations observed in different games.
  • The Xeon v4 series processors do not provide substantial performance gains over their v3 counterparts on the LGA2011-3 socket, considering the significant price difference between the two.
  • Xeon v4 processors offer better energy efficiency and lower power consumption, making them suitable for budget-friendly motherboard options.
  • The cost-effectiveness of the Xeon v3 series processors makes them a more viable option for most users.

FAQ

Q: Are Xeon v4 processors worth the price premium over v3 processors? A: Based on performance tests, the gains achieved by upgrading to Xeon v4 series processors are not substantial enough to justify the significant price difference over their v3 counterparts. It is recommended to opt for the more cost-effective v3 series processors.

Q: Do Xeon v4 processors offer improved gaming performance? A: The gaming performance of Xeon v4 processors is comparable to that of v3 processors, with only minor variations observed in different games. Therefore, the overall gaming experience is similar between the two processor series.

Q: Are Xeon v4 processors more energy-efficient than v3 processors? A: Yes, Xeon v4 processors offer better energy efficiency and lower power consumption compared to v3 processors. This makes them suitable for use with budget-friendly motherboard options and helps mitigate the risk of VRM zone overheating.

Q: Are Xeon v4 processors compatible with DDR3 memory? A: No, Xeon v4 processors only support DDR4 memory. The memory compatibility of Xeon v3 processors includes both DDR3 and DDR4, with a maximum supported frequency of 2133MHz in both cases.

Most people like

Are you spending too much time looking for ai tools?
App rating
4.9
AI Tools
100k+
Trusted Users
5000+
WHY YOU SHOULD CHOOSE TOOLIFY

TOOLIFY is the best ai tool source.

Browse More Content