CodeGPT VS Boxes.dev
CodeGPT VS Boxes.dev对比，CodeGPT 和 Boxes.dev 有什么区别？
猜你喜欢
总结
CodeGPT 总结
Artificial intelligence inside your IDE with this open source extension
CodeGPT 着陆页
Boxes.dev 总结
Cloud dev environments for agentic coding. Run each Claude Code or Codex chat on its own computer in the cloud, connect from mobile and desktop, and code from anywhere.
Boxes.dev 着陆页
比较详细信息
CodeGPT 详细信息
| 类别 | AI智能体, AI代码助手, AI代码审查, AI代码生成器, AI智能助手, AI开发者工具, 人工智能接口 |
| CodeGPT 网站 | https://codegpt.co?utm_source=toolify |
| 添加时间 | 2023年5月23日 |
| CodeGPT 定价 | Plus |
Boxes.dev 详细信息
| 类别 | AI智能体, AI开发者工具, AI代码助手, AI智能助手, 无代码与低代码开发 |
| Boxes.dev 网站 | https://boxes.dev?utm_source=toolify |
| 添加时间 | 2026年6月8日 |
| Boxes.dev 定价 | -- |
使用情况比较
如何使用 CodeGPT？
Use CodeGPT by creating a free account and exploring the AI Agents Marketplace. Integrate the VSCode/Cursor Extension or JetBrains IDEs Plugin to access AI coding assistance and automate tasks like PR reviews. Teams can train AI agents on their tech docs and repositories for tailored assistance.
如何使用 Boxes.dev？
To use Boxes.dev, move your project codebase into a cloud devbox using the CLI command `dvb init`. The platform automatically scans your local dev environment and creates a setup plan. Once approved, a coding agent recreates your dev environment in the cloud. You can then fork the primary VM to run tasks on their own machines, start Codex or Claude Code, and review, steer, or ship code from mobile, desktop, or CLI surfaces.
比较 CodeGPT 和 Boxes.dev 的优势
CodeGPT的核心功能
- AI Coding Assistant
- Automated Code Reviews
- AI Agents Marketplace
- Codebase Understanding
- Custom AI Assistant Creation
- Self-Hosted Option
Boxes.dev的核心功能
- Full cloud computer per agent with isolated filesystem, services, and database state
- Instant snapshots and forks for running multiple agents in parallel
- Persistent terminal sessions and continuous background execution when offline
- Multi-surface control supporting macOS desktop, iOS/Android mobile, and scriptable CLI
- Localhost port forwarding that automatically follows the selected fork
- Cloud scheduled and webhook automation triggers (e.g., via Slack or Linear)
比较使用案例
CodeGPT的使用案例
- Automating pull request reviews
- Onboarding new developers quickly
- Providing AI-powered coding assistance within IDEs
- Discovering code and dependencies across large codebases
- Streamlining large-scale code transformations
Boxes.dev的使用案例
- Running multiple Claude Code or Codex tasks simultaneously on separate virtual machines
- Leaving complex coding agent tasks running overnight or while traveling without keeping a laptop open
- Reviewing agent threads, diffs, and approving or steering code changes directly from a smartphone
- Automating regular codebase tasks like weekly dependency audits triggered on a schedule
CodeGPT和Boxes.dev的不同计划
CodeGPT
$0
Perfect for beginners
$13.5/mo/Seat (Billed Annually)
Access to Premium models like Gemini, Claude, and OpenAI.
$27/mo/Seat (Billed Annually)
Unlimited Custom AI Assistants
Contact Us
Tailored AI for your business
Boxes.dev
$0 / free
10 free box-hours, Main devbox + 2 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Bring your own Codex + Claude Code, Desktop, mobile, web, CLI
$19 / user / mo
40 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 4 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.75 / box-hour, Email support
$99 / user / mo
250 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 10 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.60 / box-hour, Priority support
Custom volume
Custom seat & box-hour pools, SSO, SCIM, RBAC, Audit logs and spend controls, Dedicated resources & deployment, Custom MSA, security review
比较定价
CodeGPT 定价
$9.99/mo
Boxes.dev 定价
对不起，没有数据
CodeGPT的流量
CodeGPT 是月访问量为 262.2K 且平均访问时长为 00:00:36 的工具。 CodeGPT 的每次访问页数为 1.82，跳出率为 44.66%。
最新流量情况
| 月访问量 | 262.2K |
| 平均·访问时长 | 00:00:36 |
| 每次访问页数 | 1.82 |
| 跳出率 | 44.66% |
Boxes.dev的流量
Boxes.dev 是月访问量为 0 且平均访问时长为 00:00:00 的工具。 Boxes.dev 的每次访问页数为 0.00，跳出率为 0.00%。
最新流量情况
| 月访问量 | 0 |
| 平均·访问时长 | 00:00:00 |
| 每次访问页数 | 0.00 |
| 跳出率 | 0.00% |
地理位置
CodeGPT 的前 5 个国家/地区是：India 6.60%, Indonesia 5.43%, United States 5.37%, Brazil 3.76%, Senegal 2.88%
Top 5 国家/地区
 | 6.60% |
 | 5.43% |
 | 5.37% |
 | 3.76% |
 | 2.88% |
地理位置
对不起，没有数据
流量来源
CodeGPT 的 6 个主要流量来源是：直接访问 35.14%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 31.30%, 外链引荐 28.22%, vs_sourcesGenAi 2.10%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 1.80%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.66%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.43%, 邮件 0.26%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.09%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%
直接访问 | 35.14% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 31.30% |
外链引荐 | 28.22% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 2.10% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 1.80% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.66% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.43% |
邮件 | 0.26% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.09% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
流量来源
Boxes.dev 的 6 个主要流量来源是：邮件 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, 直接访问 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, 外链引荐 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
邮件 | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
直接访问 | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
外链引荐 | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
CodeGPT 或 Boxes.dev哪个更好？
CodeGPT 可能比 Boxes.dev 更受欢迎。如您所见，CodeGPT 每月有 262.2K 次访问，而 Boxes.dev 每月有 0 次访问。 所以更多的人选择了CodeGPT。 因此，人们很可能会在社交平台上更多地推荐 CodeGPT。
CodeGPT 的平均访问持续时间为 00:00:36，而 Boxes.dev 的平均访问持续时间为 00:00:00。 此外，CodeGPT 的每次访问页面为 1.82，跳出率为 44.66%。 Boxes.dev 的每次访问页面为 0.00，跳出率为 0.00%。
CodeGPT 的主要用户是India, Indonesia, United States, Brazil, Senegal，分布如下：6.60%, 5.43%, 5.37%, 3.76%, 2.88%。
查看其他对比
精选*
