Comparez Boxes.dev VS Zaro, quelle est la différence entre Boxes.dev et Zaro ?








Cloud dev environments for agentic coding. Run each Claude Code or Codex chat on its own computer in the cloud, connect from mobile and desktop, and code from anywhere.
Boxes.dev Page de destination

Zaro is where you can build working software from your scattered work. Everything you know is spread across Gmail, Slack, notes, and tabs that don't talk - Zaro pulls it into one place and lets you build apps from it in minutes: your research, your side projects, your plans, your decisions. Then they keep themselves updated, checking your connections every day so you don't have to. No code. No maintenance. No graveyard of prototypes you started and never finished.
Zaro Page de destination


| Catégories | Agence AI, Outils pour développeurs AI, AI Assistant de Code, AI Copilot, No-Code et Low-Code |
| Site Web de Boxes.dev | https://boxes.dev?utm_source=toolify |
| Temps supplémentaire | Juin 08 2026 |
| Boxes.dev Tarification | -- |
| Catégories | Agence AI, Créateur d'applications IA, Workflow IA |
| Site Web de Zaro | https://zaro.ai?utm_source=toolify |
| Temps supplémentaire | Juin 30 2026 |
| Zaro Tarification | -- |
To use Boxes.dev, move your project codebase into a cloud devbox using the CLI command `dvb init`. The platform automatically scans your local dev environment and creates a setup plan. Once approved, a coding agent recreates your dev environment in the cloud. You can then fork the primary VM to run tasks on their own machines, start Codex or Claude Code, and review, steer, or ship code from mobile, desktop, or CLI surfaces.
To use Zaro, first create a siloed workspace for your organization or team. Connect your existing data sources such as files, call logs, CRM records, and Slack threads to build your context infrastructure. From there, you can run and schedule AI agents to execute tasks, or generate custom applications like dashboards and pipeline trackers by simply describing what you need in plain text.
$0 / free
10 free box-hours, Main devbox + 2 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Bring your own Codex + Claude Code, Desktop, mobile, web, CLI
$19 / user / mo
40 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 4 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.75 / box-hour, Email support
$99 / user / mo
250 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 10 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.60 / box-hour, Priority support
Custom volume
Custom seat & box-hour pools, SSO, SCIM, RBAC, Audit logs and spend controls, Dedicated resources & deployment, Custom MSA, security review
Free
2,500 free credits valid for 14 days. Access all features and all integrations included.
$19 /mo
8,000 credits / month. Includes 1 workspace, unlimited members, agents, and apps, one shared credit pool, public link sharing, and custom domains.
$49 /mo
25,000 credits / month. Includes everything in Launch, up to 5 workspaces, a 20% discount on credits, priority support, usage analytics, and spend alerts.
Custom
Volume credits on your terms. Includes a tailored number of workspaces, SSO/SAML, audit logs, dedicated model inference or BYOK, SLA, and dedicated support.
Boxes.dev est celui avec 2.4K visites mensuelles et 00:03:33 durée moyenne des visites. Boxes.dev a une page par visite de 2.08 et un taux de rebond de 43.13%.
| Visites mensuelles | 2.4K |
| Durée moyenne de la visite | 00:03:33 |
| Pages par visite | 2.08 |
| Taux de rebond | 43.13% |
Zaro est celui avec 64.0K visites mensuelles et 00:05:42 durée moyenne des visites. Zaro a une page par visite de 7.41 et un taux de rebond de 50.60%.
| Visites mensuelles | 64.0K |
| Durée moyenne de la visite | 00:05:42 |
| Pages par visite | 7.41 |
| Taux de rebond | 50.60% |
Désolé, il n'y a pas de données
Les 5 premiers pays/régions pour Zaro sont :India 49.55%, United States 38.28%, United Kingdom 11.25%, Germany 0.63%, South Africa 0.16%
| 49.55% | |
![]() | 38.28% |
![]() | 11.25% |
| 0.63% | |
![]() | 0.16% |
Les 6 principales sources de trafic vers Boxes.dev sont :E-mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Sites référents 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
E-mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Sites référents | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Les 6 principales sources de trafic vers Zaro sont :Direct 42.05%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 20.87%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 11.43%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 7.91%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 7.63%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 7.59%, Sites référents 2.18%, E-mail 0.34%, vs_sourcesGenAi 0.00%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%
Direct | 42.05% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 20.87% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 11.43% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 7.91% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 7.63% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 7.59% |
Sites référents | 2.18% |
E-mail | 0.34% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
Zaro pourrait être un peu plus populaire que Boxes.dev. Comme vous pouvez le voir, Boxes.dev a 2.4K visites mensuelles, tandis que Zaro a 64.0K visites mensuelles. Ainsi, plus de personnes choisissent Zaro. Il y a donc de fortes chances que les gens recommandent davantage Zaro sur les plateformes sociales.
Boxes.dev a une durée Avg.visit de 00:03:33, tandis que Zaro a une durée Avg.visit de 00:05:42. En outre, Boxes.dev a une page par visite de 2.08 et un taux de rebond de 43.13%. Zaro a une page par visite de 7.41 et un taux de rebond de 50.60%.
Les principaux utilisateurs de Zaro sont India, United States, United Kingdom, Germany, South Africa, avec la distribution suivante : 49.55%, 38.28%, 11.25%, 0.63%, 0.16%.