Comparez TinyCommand VS Ninjō, quelle est la différence entre TinyCommand et Ninjō ?








TinyCommand brings your forms, workflows, data, emails, and AI agents together, so everything connects and runs on its own. Build smarter, automate faster, and manage it all in one no-code platform.
TinyCommand Page de destination

Ninjō is infrastructure for AI sales agents on Instagram, WhatsApp & every channel where you sell. Create, test, analyze and improve agents by talking to Claude, ChatGPT, Claude Code or Codex via MCP — backed by templates validated across 150+ production agents that closed real revenue ($750K generated for clients). Versioned changes with instant rollback, synthetic-conversation testing, follow-ups, keyword triggers and a built-in CRM. Zero to live in minutes. Start free with 1,000 messages.
Ninjō Page de destination


| Catégories | Agence AI, Workflow IA, No-Code et Low-Code, Formulaires IA, Génération de leads AI, Recrutement AI, Générateur d Emails AI |
| Site Web de TinyCommand | https://www.tinycommand.com?utm_source=toolify |
| Temps supplémentaire | Décembre 02 2025 |
| TinyCommand Tarification | -- |
| Catégories | Agence AI, Assistant Commercial IA, Génération de leads AI, Service client IA |
| Site Web de Ninjō | https://www.ninjo.ai?utm_source=toolify |
| Temps supplémentaire | Août 27 2026 |
| Ninjō Tarification | -- |
Users can build smart forms with customized APIs, create automation workflows using a visual drag-and-drop builder, manage and analyze data in TinyTables, design personalized email templates, and integrate AI Agents to handle tasks like research, qualification, or enrichment. The platform allows connecting various apps, adding logic, and putting business processes on autopilot without writing any code.
Start a free trial or use the free message allowance, then connect the channels where customers contact you. Create an AI agent from the dashboard or through Claude or ChatGPT using MCP. Configure the agent’s voice, offer, qualification flow, follow-ups, triggers, alerts, and handoff rules. Test the agent with synthetic conversations, review its performance, and publish it to live customer conversations. Agencies can manage multiple client agents from one account, schedule portfolio reports, and contact Ninjō for white-label onboarding and custom integrations.
$0
Truly free. No trials. No credit card required. Includes unlimited form submissions, 1,000 credits, 1 Workspace / Project, 1 User / Seat, 15 days execution history, 1 credit/node Workflow Executions, 10 credits/record ICP Creation, Data enrichment, 10 credits/AI agent node. Maximum file size 5 MB.
$19
For individuals automating simple workflows - effortlessly. Includes unlimited form submissions, 10,000 credits, 1 Workspace / Project, 3 Users / Seats, 15 days execution history, 1 credit/node Workflow Executions, 10 credits/record ICP Creation, Data enrichment, 10 credits/AI agent node. Maximum file size 5 MB.
$49
Most popular. For pros who need advanced automation & integrations. Includes unlimited form submissions, 50,000 credits, 5 Workspaces / Projects, 10 Users / Seats, 30 days execution history, 1 credit/node Workflow Executions, 10 credits/record ICP Creation, Data enrichment, 10 credits/AI agent node. Maximum file size 10 MB.
$149
For agencies automating and scaling client operations. Includes unlimited form submissions, 250,000 credits, Unlimited Workspaces / Projects, 50 Users / Seats, 30 days execution history, 1 credit/node Workflow Executions, 10 credits/record ICP Creation, Data enrichment, 10 credits/AI agent node. Maximum file size 25 MB.
$150 per month + $0.035 per message sent
14-day free trial, 500 free messages, no credit card required, unlimited agents, multi-channel support, follow-ups, triggers, automatic alerts, and five-minute setup
Custom pricing
Ninjō under your brand with partnership setup, guided onboarding, client portfolio management, dedicated success manager, autonomy rules, WhatsApp and Slack handoffs, custom integrations, and custom flows
TinyCommand est celui avec 35.8K visites mensuelles et 00:00:48 durée moyenne des visites. TinyCommand a une page par visite de 2.74 et un taux de rebond de 36.85%.
| Visites mensuelles | 35.8K |
| Durée moyenne de la visite | 00:00:48 |
| Pages par visite | 2.74 |
| Taux de rebond | 36.85% |
Ninjō est celui avec 58.3K visites mensuelles et 00:03:19 durée moyenne des visites. Ninjō a une page par visite de 5.11 et un taux de rebond de 10.91%.
| Visites mensuelles | 58.3K |
| Durée moyenne de la visite | 00:03:19 |
| Pages par visite | 5.11 |
| Taux de rebond | 10.91% |
Les 5 premiers pays/régions pour TinyCommand sont :United States 27.02%, Nigeria 8.82%, India 8.61%, Vietnam 6.87%, Germany 5.39%
![]() | 27.02% |
| 8.82% | |
| 8.61% | |
| 6.87% | |
| 5.39% |
Les 2 premiers pays/régions pour Ninjō sont :Paraguay 99.47%, Argentina 0.53%
| 99.47% | |
| 0.53% |
Les 6 principales sources de trafic vers TinyCommand sont :E-mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Sites référents 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
E-mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Sites référents | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Les 6 principales sources de trafic vers Ninjō sont :E-mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Sites référents 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
E-mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Sites référents | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Ninjō pourrait être un peu plus populaire que TinyCommand. Comme vous pouvez le voir, TinyCommand a 35.8K visites mensuelles, tandis que Ninjō a 58.3K visites mensuelles. Ainsi, plus de personnes choisissent Ninjō. Il y a donc de fortes chances que les gens recommandent davantage Ninjō sur les plateformes sociales.
TinyCommand a une durée Avg.visit de 00:00:48, tandis que Ninjō a une durée Avg.visit de 00:03:19. En outre, TinyCommand a une page par visite de 2.74 et un taux de rebond de 36.85%. Ninjō a une page par visite de 5.11 et un taux de rebond de 10.91%.
Les principaux utilisateurs de TinyCommand sont United States, Nigeria, India, Vietnam, Germany, avec la distribution suivante : 27.02%, 8.82%, 8.61%, 6.87%, 5.39%.
Les principaux utilisateurs de Ninjō sont Paraguay, Argentina, avec la distribution suivante : 99.47%, 0.53%.