Contents.com VS Press Ranger
Compare Contents.com VS Press Ranger, what is the difference between Contents.com and Press Ranger?
You may like
Summarize
Contents.com summarize
Power up your content strategy. The Generative AI platform makes content creation easy and built for performance.
Contents.com Landing Page
Press Ranger summarize
Press Ranger is an AI-powered PR tool that makes getting media coverage painless. - Database of 500,000+ Journalists and Publishers - Automatically identify pitch requests from all over the web - AI tools to create media lists and run outreach
Press Ranger Landing Page
Compare Details
Contents.com details
| Categories | AI Content Generator, AI Product Description Generator, AI SEO Assistant, Copywriting, Translate |
| Contents.com Website | https://contents.com |
| Added Time | March 07 2023 |
| Contents.com Pricing | Paid plans |
Press Ranger details
| Categories | AI SEO Assistant |
| Press Ranger Website | https://pressranger.com |
| Added Time | April 27 2024 |
| Press Ranger Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Contents.com?
To use Contents.com, sign up for a free trial or log in to your account. Once you're logged in, you can access the platform's various tools and services. For content creation, select the AI Writer tool powered by GPT-4. Choose a template that suits your content needs and fill in the required information. The AI Writer will generate content based on the template and your input. You can also explore other tools like Industry Trends to stay updated on the most sought-after topics in your industry, AI Chat for creative ideas and suggestions, AI Art for generating original images, Audio ↔ Text for diversifying your content formats, and AI Translation for localizing your content into multiple languages. Additionally, Contents.com offers professional writing services for requesting content created by copywriters, translations by native speakers, or AI-generated content reviewed by proofreaders.
How to use Press Ranger?
Sign up, select a plan, access journalist database, create media lists, pitch journalists, track analytics
Compare Pros between Contents.com and Press Ranger
Core features of Contents.com
- Content ideation
- Content creation
- Content transformation
- Keyword optimization
- Machine-based translation
- Glossary creation
- Draft proofreading
- Virtual editing
- NLG draft proofreading
- SEO-oriented texts
- Copywriting
- Marketing copy
- Website content creation
- Blog post writing
Core features of Press Ranger
- Database of 500,000+ Journalists and Publishers
- Automatically identify pitch requests
- AI tools for creating media lists and outreach
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Contents.com
- Marketing teams
- E-commerce
- Publishers
- Web agencies
- Bloggers
- Large corporations
Use cases for Press Ranger
- Building media lists
- Pitching journalists
- Automated press release distribution
Different Plan between Contents.com and Press Ranger
Contents.com
Sorry, there are no data
Press Ranger
Monthly Annual Save up to 50%
500,000+ Journalist profiles, 100,000+ Publishers, CRM, AI media campaigns, AI-written emails, CSV Exports
$79/year/month
500,000+ journalist profiles, 160,000 media publisher profiles, CRM, Complete contact information, AI-written emails, Unlimited AI media campaigns, CSV Exports
$149/year/month
500,000+ journalist profiles, 160,000 media publisher profiles, CRM, Complete contact information, AI-written emails, Unlimited AI media campaigns, Export 750 records per month
Compare Pricing
Contents.com Pricing
start from $ 20/Month
Press Ranger Pricing
Sorry, there are no data
Contents.com's traffic
Contents.com is the one with 132.8K monthly visits and 00:02:20 Avg.visit duration. Contents.com has a Page per visit of 2.59 and a bounce rate of 55.59%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 132.8K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:02:20 |
| Page per Visit | 2.59 |
| Bounce Rate | 55.59% |
Press Ranger's traffic
Press Ranger is the one with 0 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. Press Ranger has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 0 |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
| Page per Visit | 0.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Contents.com are:Italy 56.82%, France 8.53%, Spain 6.59%, Netherlands 3.14%, Colombia 2.63%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 56.82% |
 | 8.53% |
 | 6.59% |
 | 3.14% |
 | 2.63% |
Geography
The top 1 countries/regions for Press Ranger are:Australia 100.00%
Top 1 Countries/regions
 | 100.00% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Contents.com are: Direct 73.03%, Search 12.64%, Social 8.41%, Referrals 5.38%, Mail 0.52%, Display Ads 0.02%
Direct | 73.03% |
Search | 12.64% |
Social | 8.41% |
Referrals | 5.38% |
Mail | 0.52% |
Display Ads | 0.02% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Press Ranger are: Search 100.00%, Mail 0.00%, Direct 0.00%, Social 0.00%, Referrals 0.00%, Display Ads 0.00%
Search | 100.00% |
Mail | 0.00% |
Direct | 0.00% |
Social | 0.00% |
Referrals | 0.00% |
Display Ads | 0.00% |
Which is better: Contents.com or Press Ranger?
Contents.com might be a bit more popular than Press Ranger.As you can see, Contents.com has 132.8K monthly visits, while Press Ranger has 0 monthly visits. So more people choose Contents.com. So the odds are that people will recommend Contents.com more on social platforms.
Contents.com has an Avg.visit duration of 00:02:20, while Press Ranger has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00. Also, Contents.com has a page per visit of 2.59 and a Bounce Rate of 55.59%. Press Ranger has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%.
The main users of Contents.com are Italy, France, Spain, Netherlands, Colombia, with the following distribution: 56.82%, 8.53%, 6.59%, 3.14%, 2.63%.
The main users of Press Ranger are Australia, with the following distribution: 100.00%.
See other comparisons
Most people like
17.49%
31.09%