Comparez Boxes.dev VS Revyl, quelle est la différence entre Boxes.dev et Revyl ?








Cloud dev environments for agentic coding. Run each Claude Code or Codex chat on its own computer in the cloud, connect from mobile and desktop, and code from anywhere.
Boxes.dev Page de destination

Revyl gives mobile teams full observability into how their app actually behaves on live cloud devices. Step-level execution traces, performance data (CPU, memory, FPS), a complete network waterfall, and state and file-system diffing across every run. Atlas auto-maps every screen and flow in your app, and revyl dev brings hot reload and device control into your dev loop.
Revyl Page de destination


| Catégories | Agence AI, Outils pour développeurs AI, AI Assistant de Code, AI Copilot, No-Code et Low-Code |
| Site Web de Boxes.dev | https://boxes.dev?utm_source=toolify |
| Temps supplémentaire | Juin 08 2026 |
| Boxes.dev Tarification | -- |
| Catégories | Agence AI, AI Tests, Outils pour développeurs AI |
| Site Web de Revyl | https://revyl.com?utm_source=toolify |
| Temps supplémentaire | Juin 30 2026 |
| Revyl Tarification | -- |
To use Boxes.dev, move your project codebase into a cloud devbox using the CLI command `dvb init`. The platform automatically scans your local dev environment and creates a setup plan. Once approved, a coding agent recreates your dev environment in the cloud. You can then fork the primary VM to run tasks on their own machines, start Codex or Claude Code, and review, steer, or ship code from mobile, desktop, or CLI surfaces.
Developers can start by running sessions from the Revyl CLI or MCP to provision live cloud devices, install builds, and control them. They can define end-to-end mobile workflows in natural language or utilize the Python SDK to interact with the device. Teams can also integrate Revyl into their GitHub Actions CI pipelines to scale test coverage across iOS and Android builds simultaneously, review test results via replayable evidence, and view app architecture using the Atlas runtime map.
$0 / free
10 free box-hours, Main devbox + 2 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Bring your own Codex + Claude Code, Desktop, mobile, web, CLI
$19 / user / mo
40 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 4 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.75 / box-hour, Email support
$99 / user / mo
250 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 10 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.60 / box-hour, Priority support
Custom volume
Custom seat & box-hour pools, SSO, SCIM, RBAC, Audit logs and spend controls, Dedicated resources & deployment, Custom MSA, security review
$20/month
For individual developers. Includes Atlas access, limited device usage, 1 concurrent device, iOS & Android simulators, CI integrations, and run history & artifacts. Annual plan is $192/year.
$250/month
For small teams. Everything in Solo, plus 15x Solo usage, 3 concurrent devices, unlimited team members, and a shared Slack channel. Annual plan is $2400/year.
$750/month
For growing teams. Everything in Starter, plus 50x Solo usage, 10 concurrent devices, priority queue, SSO, and dedicated support. Annual plan is $7200/year.
Custom
For organizations at scale. Everything in Team Pro, plus custom usage, unlimited concurrency, dedicated iOS runners, dedicated instances, SSO (SAML & OIDC), and custom SLAs.
Boxes.dev est celui avec 0 visites mensuelles et 00:00:00 durée moyenne des visites. Boxes.dev a une page par visite de 0.00 et un taux de rebond de 0.00%.
| Visites mensuelles | 0 |
| Durée moyenne de la visite | 00:00:00 |
| Pages par visite | 0.00 |
| Taux de rebond | 0.00% |
Revyl est celui avec 19.6K visites mensuelles et 00:00:15 durée moyenne des visites. Revyl a une page par visite de 1.43 et un taux de rebond de 43.69%.
| Visites mensuelles | 19.6K |
| Durée moyenne de la visite | 00:00:15 |
| Pages par visite | 1.43 |
| Taux de rebond | 43.69% |
Désolé, il n'y a pas de données
Les 5 premiers pays/régions pour Revyl sont :United States 63.79%, Vietnam 18.36%, India 9.57%, Brazil 5.24%, Israel 2.10%
![]() | 63.79% |
| 18.36% | |
| 9.57% | |
![]() | 5.24% |
| 2.10% |
Les 6 principales sources de trafic vers Boxes.dev sont :E-mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Sites référents 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
E-mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Sites référents | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Les 6 principales sources de trafic vers Revyl sont :Direct 47.36%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 24.41%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 23.29%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 2.53%, Sites référents 2.42%, E-mail 0.00%, vs_sourcesGenAi 0.00%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.00%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%
Direct | 47.36% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 24.41% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 23.29% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 2.53% |
Sites référents | 2.42% |
E-mail | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
Revyl pourrait être un peu plus populaire que Boxes.dev. Comme vous pouvez le voir, Boxes.dev a 0 visites mensuelles, tandis que Revyl a 19.6K visites mensuelles. Ainsi, plus de personnes choisissent Revyl. Il y a donc de fortes chances que les gens recommandent davantage Revyl sur les plateformes sociales.
Boxes.dev a une durée Avg.visit de 00:00:00, tandis que Revyl a une durée Avg.visit de 00:00:15. En outre, Boxes.dev a une page par visite de 0.00 et un taux de rebond de 0.00%. Revyl a une page par visite de 1.43 et un taux de rebond de 43.69%.
Les principaux utilisateurs de Revyl sont United States, Vietnam, India, Brazil, Israel, avec la distribution suivante : 63.79%, 18.36%, 9.57%, 5.24%, 2.10%.