Boxes.dev VS Revyl
Compare Boxes.dev VS Revyl, what is the difference between Boxes.dev and Revyl?
You may like
Summarize
Boxes.dev summarize
Cloud dev environments for agentic coding. Run each Claude Code or Codex chat on its own computer in the cloud, connect from mobile and desktop, and code from anywhere.
Boxes.dev Landing Page
Revyl summarize
Revyl gives mobile teams full observability into how their app actually behaves on live cloud devices. Step-level execution traces, performance data (CPU, memory, FPS), a complete network waterfall, and state and file-system diffing across every run. Atlas auto-maps every screen and flow in your app, and revyl dev brings hot reload and device control into your dev loop.
Revyl Landing Page
Compare Details
Boxes.dev details
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, AI Code Assistant, AI Copilot, No-Code&Low-Code |
| Boxes.dev Website | https://boxes.dev?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | June 08 2026 |
| Boxes.dev Pricing | -- |
Revyl details
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Testing, AI Developer Tools |
| Revyl Website | https://revyl.com?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | June 30 2026 |
| Revyl Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Boxes.dev?
To use Boxes.dev, move your project codebase into a cloud devbox using the CLI command `dvb init`. The platform automatically scans your local dev environment and creates a setup plan. Once approved, a coding agent recreates your dev environment in the cloud. You can then fork the primary VM to run tasks on their own machines, start Codex or Claude Code, and review, steer, or ship code from mobile, desktop, or CLI surfaces.
How to use Revyl?
Developers can start by running sessions from the Revyl CLI or MCP to provision live cloud devices, install builds, and control them. They can define end-to-end mobile workflows in natural language or utilize the Python SDK to interact with the device. Teams can also integrate Revyl into their GitHub Actions CI pipelines to scale test coverage across iOS and Android builds simultaneously, review test results via replayable evidence, and view app architecture using the Atlas runtime map.
Compare Pros between Boxes.dev and Revyl
Core features of Boxes.dev
- Full cloud computer per agent with isolated filesystem, services, and database state
- Instant snapshots and forks for running multiple agents in parallel
- Persistent terminal sessions and continuous background execution when offline
- Multi-surface control supporting macOS desktop, iOS/Android mobile, and scriptable CLI
- Localhost port forwarding that automatically follows the selected fork
- Cloud scheduled and webhook automation triggers (e.g., via Slack or Linear)
Core features of Revyl
- Full observability with step-level traces, performance metrics, and network waterfalls
- Live cloud devices with CLI, MCP, and Python SDK access supporting hot reload
- Agentic mobile testing with natural language workflow definitions
- Replayable evidence containing screenshots, video, logs, and AI reasoning
- Atlas runtime mapping for screens, flows, UI states, and navigation paths
- CI/CD integrations for automated parallel test execution on iOS and Android
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Boxes.dev
- Running multiple Claude Code or Codex tasks simultaneously on separate virtual machines
- Leaving complex coding agent tasks running overnight or while traveling without keeping a laptop open
- Reviewing agent threads, diffs, and approving or steering code changes directly from a smartphone
- Automating regular codebase tasks like weekly dependency audits triggered on a schedule
Use cases for Revyl
- Verifying application changes and hotfixes on real cloud builds during development
- Automating regression testing in CI pipelines across multiple concurrent devices
- Giving AI agents live environments, evidence, and maps to navigate and test app flows
- Debugging complex performance or network issues using detailed runtime records and state diffs
Different Plan between Boxes.dev and Revyl
Boxes.dev
$0 / free
10 free box-hours, Main devbox + 2 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Bring your own Codex + Claude Code, Desktop, mobile, web, CLI
$19 / user / mo
40 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 4 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.75 / box-hour, Email support
$99 / user / mo
250 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 10 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.60 / box-hour, Priority support
Custom volume
Custom seat & box-hour pools, SSO, SCIM, RBAC, Audit logs and spend controls, Dedicated resources & deployment, Custom MSA, security review
Revyl
$20/month
For individual developers. Includes Atlas access, limited device usage, 1 concurrent device, iOS & Android simulators, CI integrations, and run history & artifacts. Annual plan is $192/year.
$250/month
For small teams. Everything in Solo, plus 15x Solo usage, 3 concurrent devices, unlimited team members, and a shared Slack channel. Annual plan is $2400/year.
$750/month
For growing teams. Everything in Starter, plus 50x Solo usage, 10 concurrent devices, priority queue, SSO, and dedicated support. Annual plan is $7200/year.
Custom
For organizations at scale. Everything in Team Pro, plus custom usage, unlimited concurrency, dedicated iOS runners, dedicated instances, SSO (SAML & OIDC), and custom SLAs.
Boxes.dev's traffic
Boxes.dev is the one with 0 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. Boxes.dev has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 0 |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
| Page per Visit | 0.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
Revyl's traffic
Revyl is the one with 19.6K monthly visits and 00:00:15 Avg.visit duration. Revyl has a Page per visit of 1.43 and a bounce rate of 43.69%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 19.6K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:15 |
| Page per Visit | 1.43 |
| Bounce Rate | 43.69% |
Geography
Sorry, there are no data
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Revyl are:United States 63.79%, Vietnam 18.36%, India 9.57%, Brazil 5.24%, Israel 2.10%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 63.79% |
 | 18.36% |
 | 9.57% |
 | 5.24% |
 | 2.10% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Boxes.dev are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Revyl are:Direct 47.36%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 24.41%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 23.29%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 2.53%, Referrals 2.42%, Mail 0.00%, vs_sourcesGenAi 0.00%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.00%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%
Direct | 47.36% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 24.41% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 23.29% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 2.53% |
Referrals | 2.42% |
Mail | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
Which is better: Boxes.dev or Revyl?
Revyl might be a bit more popular than Boxes.dev.As you can see, Boxes.dev has 0 monthly visits, while Revyl has 19.6K monthly visits. So more people choose Revyl. So the odds are that people will recommend Revyl more on social platforms.
Boxes.dev has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00, while Revyl has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:15. Also, Boxes.dev has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%. Revyl has a page per visit of 1.43 and a Bounce Rate of 43.69%.
The main users of Revyl are United States, Vietnam, India, Brazil, Israel, with the following distribution: 63.79%, 18.36%, 9.57%, 5.24%, 2.10%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
