Auditive VS Boxes.dev
Auditive VS Boxes.dev对比，Auditive 和 Boxes.dev 有什么区别？
猜你喜欢
总结
Auditive 总结
Auditive is the only AI-powered third-party risk marketplace that empowers businesses and their vendors to complete third-party risk assessments in a fraction of the time and never repeat them.
Auditive 着陆页
Boxes.dev 总结
Cloud dev environments for agentic coding. Run each Claude Code or Codex chat on its own computer in the cloud, connect from mobile and desktop, and code from anywhere.
Boxes.dev 着陆页
比较详细信息
Auditive 详细信息
| 类别 | 其他 |
| Auditive 网站 | https://auditive.io?utm_source=toolify |
| 添加时间 | 2024年7月9日 |
| Auditive 定价 | -- |
Boxes.dev 详细信息
| 类别 | AI智能体, AI开发者工具, AI代码助手, AI智能助手, 无代码与低代码开发 |
| Boxes.dev 网站 | https://boxes.dev?utm_source=toolify |
| 添加时间 | 2026年6月8日 |
| Boxes.dev 定价 | -- |
使用情况比较
如何使用 Auditive？
Buyers can evaluate sellers by accessing their risk posture on the network. Sellers can promote their risk posture to prospects and customers. Schedule a demo to see the platform in action.
如何使用 Boxes.dev？
To use Boxes.dev, move your project codebase into a cloud devbox using the CLI command `dvb init`. The platform automatically scans your local dev environment and creates a setup plan. Once approved, a coding agent recreates your dev environment in the cloud. You can then fork the primary VM to run tasks on their own machines, start Codex or Claude Code, and review, steer, or ship code from mobile, desktop, or CLI surfaces.
比较 Auditive 和 Boxes.dev 的优势
Auditive的核心功能
- AI-powered risk assessments
- Continuous monitoring
- Automated review processes
- Network for buyers and sellers
Boxes.dev的核心功能
- Full cloud computer per agent with isolated filesystem, services, and database state
- Instant snapshots and forks for running multiple agents in parallel
- Persistent terminal sessions and continuous background execution when offline
- Multi-surface control supporting macOS desktop, iOS/Android mobile, and scriptable CLI
- Localhost port forwarding that automatically follows the selected fork
- Cloud scheduled and webhook automation triggers (e.g., via Slack or Linear)
比较使用案例
Auditive的使用案例
- Streamline security reviews for buyers and sellers
- Automate vendor risk management
- Build trust with customers through transparent security posture
Boxes.dev的使用案例
- Running multiple Claude Code or Codex tasks simultaneously on separate virtual machines
- Leaving complex coding agent tasks running overnight or while traveling without keeping a laptop open
- Reviewing agent threads, diffs, and approving or steering code changes directly from a smartphone
- Automating regular codebase tasks like weekly dependency audits triggered on a schedule
Auditive和Boxes.dev的不同计划
Auditive
Free
For organizations who are just getting started. Includes Public Trust Page, Unlimited users, SSO with Google, Most security frameworks, One free AI-powered security review
From $800/month
For Sales and Revenue teams. Includes Everything in the free plan, SSO with SAML and Okta, Access to Shared Assessments SIG, Trust Page categories, AI security reviews, AI and integration to automatically build your Trust Page
From $2,500/month
For Risk Management teams evaluating up to 50 vendors. Includes Everything in the growth plan, Unlimited profile categories, Unlimited AI security reviews, Customizable vendor Risk Tiers, Auto-review of vendor security risk powered by AI, Customizable vendor risk insights across all security docs
Contact us
For Risk Management teams evaluating more than 50 vendors. Includes Everything in the Professional plan, White glove onboarding, Professional review of your TPRM program
Boxes.dev
$0 / free
10 free box-hours, Main devbox + 2 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Bring your own Codex + Claude Code, Desktop, mobile, web, CLI
$19 / user / mo
40 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 4 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.75 / box-hour, Email support
$99 / user / mo
250 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 10 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.60 / box-hour, Priority support
Custom volume
Custom seat & box-hour pools, SSO, SCIM, RBAC, Audit logs and spend controls, Dedicated resources & deployment, Custom MSA, security review
Auditive的流量
Auditive 是月访问量为 1.0K 且平均访问时长为 00:00:59 的工具。 Auditive 的每次访问页数为 2.06，跳出率为 31.67%。
最新流量情况
| 月访问量 | 1.0K |
| 平均·访问时长 | 00:00:59 |
| 每次访问页数 | 2.06 |
| 跳出率 | 31.67% |
Boxes.dev的流量
Boxes.dev 是月访问量为 0 且平均访问时长为 00:00:00 的工具。 Boxes.dev 的每次访问页数为 0.00，跳出率为 0.00%。
最新流量情况
| 月访问量 | 0 |
| 平均·访问时长 | 00:00:00 |
| 每次访问页数 | 0.00 |
| 跳出率 | 0.00% |
地理位置
Auditive 的前 3 个国家/地区是：United States 57.33%, South Africa 33.08%, India 9.59%
Top 3 国家/地区
 | 57.33% |
 | 33.08% |
 | 9.59% |
地理位置
对不起，没有数据
流量来源
Auditive 的 6 个主要流量来源是：邮件 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, 直接访问 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, 外链引荐 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
邮件 | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
直接访问 | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
外链引荐 | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
流量来源
Boxes.dev 的 6 个主要流量来源是：邮件 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, 直接访问 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, 外链引荐 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
邮件 | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
直接访问 | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
外链引荐 | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Auditive 或 Boxes.dev哪个更好？
Auditive 可能比 Boxes.dev 更受欢迎。如您所见，Auditive 每月有 1.0K 次访问，而 Boxes.dev 每月有 0 次访问。 所以更多的人选择了Auditive。 因此，人们很可能会在社交平台上更多地推荐 Auditive。
Auditive 的平均访问持续时间为 00:00:59，而 Boxes.dev 的平均访问持续时间为 00:00:00。 此外，Auditive 的每次访问页面为 2.06，跳出率为 31.67%。 Boxes.dev 的每次访问页面为 0.00，跳出率为 0.00%。
Auditive 的主要用户是United States, South Africa, India，分布如下：57.33%, 33.08%, 9.59%。
查看其他对比
精选*
