I'm a PhD student in visual neuroscience at the University of Toronto who also happens to spend way too much time fine-tuning, merging, and quantizing open-weight models on rented H100s and a local DGX Spark. It's a hobby that got out of hand. If my uploads have been useful to you, consider buying a PhD student a coffee. It goes a long way toward keeping these experiments running.
GGUF quantizations of
Harmonic-Hermes-9B
for local inference with llama.cpp, Ollama, LM Studio, and other GGUF-compatible runtimes.
Harmonic-Hermes-9B is the
Stage 2 agentic fine-tune
of
Harmonic-9B
— a dedicated tool-calling and agent model built on top of a strong reasoning backbone.
Where Harmonic-9B teaches the model
how to think
, Harmonic-Hermes-9B teaches it
how to act
— structured tool use, multi-turn agent workflows, and function calling, all grounded in the reasoning depth from Stage 1.
Stage 1
—
Harmonic-9B
: Heavy reasoning fine-tune on privately generated, structurally validated data. Every row passes strict quality gates. The thinking backbone.
Stage 2
(this model): Agentic fine-tune on
hermes-agent-traces-filtered
— 3,679 structurally validated agent traces with deep reasoning, tool calling, and multi-turn workflows.
Available Quantizations
File
Quant
Size
Use Case
Qwen3.5-9B-Harmonic.F16.gguf
F16
~18 GB
Maximum quality, needs 24GB+ VRAM
Harmonic-Hermes-9B-Q8_0.gguf
Q8_0
~9.5 GB
Near-lossless, 16GB VRAM
Qwen3.5-9B-Harmonic.Q4_K_M.gguf
Q4_K_M
~5.3 GB
Best 4-bit for quality
Vision (Multimodal)
This model includes vision projectors for multimodal inference. Use with llama.cpp's
--mmproj
flag for image understanding tasks.
How Our Training Data Compares
Quality Comparison
Metrics Summary
We ran the same structural quality analysis used for Stage 1 against comparable public agentic datasets. The results show why starting from quality-filtered data matters:
Metric
Harmonic Traces
(ours)
Carnice GLM-5
(kai-os)
Rows
3,679
1,627
Source model
Multiple frontier models
GLM-5 via OpenRouter
Think block depth
581 words avg
40 words avg
Self-correction
63.0%
29.7%
Verification
95.9%
63.7%
Alternative exploration
43.7%
51.3%
Valid JSON (all tool calls)
100%
100%
Tool calls per conversation
18.5
5.4
Messages per conversation
32.1
12.1
Multi-turn (>5 messages)
97.8%
89.6%
The critical gap is reasoning depth:
581 vs 40 words
in think blocks. Carnice traces plan briefly then act — the model learns tool-call formatting but not deliberation. Our traces contain 14x deeper reasoning before every action, with nearly universal verification (96% vs 64%) and twice the self-correction rate.
The conversation depth also matters for agent training. Our traces average 32 messages and 18 tool calls per trajectory — complete agentic sessions, not short dispatches. This teaches the model to maintain coherent state across extended multi-step workflows.
Reasoning Flow
Marker density across thinking traces — the filtered set shows tighter, more consistent reasoning structure.
Tool calling / function calling
— structured JSON tool use in the Hermes agent format
Multi-turn agent workflows
— maintains coherent state across extended tool-use conversations
Reasoning-grounded decisions
— inherits Harmonic-9B's self-correction, verification, and exploration before committing to actions
Training Approach
Harmonic-Hermes-9B is a Stage 2 fine-tune of
Harmonic-9B
, trained on
hermes-agent-traces-filtered
— 3,679 structurally validated agent traces with deep reasoning, tool calling, and multi-turn workflows.
The key insight: most agent models are fine-tuned directly from base models or generic instruct tunes. They learn tool-call formatting but not
when
or
why
to use tools. By starting from a model that already reasons deeply (Stage 1), the agent behaviors are grounded in genuine multi-step thinking rather than pattern-matched tool invocations.
Usage
Ollama
ollama run DJLougen/Harmonic-Hermes-9B-GGUF
llama.cpp
./llama-cli -m Harmonic-Hermes-9B-Q8_0.gguf -p "Use the available tools to..." -n 4096
LM Studio
Download any quantization and load in LM Studio. The model follows standard ChatML formatting.
Reasoning + Tool Use
The model uses
<think>
blocks for reasoning before acting:
<think>
The user wants to check the weather in Toronto. I have a get_weather tool available.
Let me call it with the right parameters...
</think>
<tool_call>
{"name": "get_weather", "arguments": {"location": "Toronto, Canada"}}
</tool_call>
Intended Use
Agentic workflows with tool calling and function execution
Harmonic-Hermes-9B-GGUF huggingface.co is an AI model on huggingface.co that provides Harmonic-Hermes-9B-GGUF's model effect (), which can be used instantly with this DJLougen Harmonic-Hermes-9B-GGUF model. huggingface.co supports a free trial of the Harmonic-Hermes-9B-GGUF model, and also provides paid use of the Harmonic-Hermes-9B-GGUF. Support call Harmonic-Hermes-9B-GGUF model through api, including Node.js, Python, http.
Harmonic-Hermes-9B-GGUF huggingface.co is an online trial and call api platform, which integrates Harmonic-Hermes-9B-GGUF's modeling effects, including api services, and provides a free online trial of Harmonic-Hermes-9B-GGUF, you can try Harmonic-Hermes-9B-GGUF online for free by clicking the link below.
DJLougen Harmonic-Hermes-9B-GGUF online free url in huggingface.co:
Harmonic-Hermes-9B-GGUF is an open source model from GitHub that offers a free installation service, and any user can find Harmonic-Hermes-9B-GGUF on GitHub to install. At the same time, huggingface.co provides the effect of Harmonic-Hermes-9B-GGUF install, users can directly use Harmonic-Hermes-9B-GGUF installed effect in huggingface.co for debugging and trial. It also supports api for free installation.
Harmonic-Hermes-9B-GGUF install url in huggingface.co: