elastix-ai / HyperPrune-gpt-oss-20b-4to8

HyperPrune-gpt-oss-20b-4to8

openai/gpt-oss-20b pruned to 4:8 semi-structured sparsity with HyperPrune (Sun & Sakuma, Learning Semi-Structured Sparsity for LLMs via Shared and Context-Aware Hypernetwork , ICLR 2026, OpenReview ).

This is a reproduction run produced at Elastix as part of the BLADE sparsity-method comparison. It is plain sparse bf16 / fp16 safetensors and loads with stock transformers :

from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
m = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("elastix-ai/HyperPrune-gpt-oss-20b-4to8")
t = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("openai/gpt-oss-20b")

What differs from the paper's own recipe

Everything else — hypernet architecture, both training stages, all learning rates, step counts, temperature, prior, row selection — is HyperPrune's own shipped setting.

Configuration

{
  "model": {
    "name_or_path": "openai/gpt-oss-20b",
    "dtype": "bfloat16",
    "moe_routing": "routed"
  },
  "data": {
    "dataset_name": "elastiml:elastix-ai/elastiml-calib-gpt-oss-20b",
    "num_samples": 128,
    "seq_len": 2048,
    "seed": 42
  },
  "sparsity": {
    "n": 4,
    "m": 8
  },
  "hypernet": {
    "type": "mlp",
    "hidden_dim": 256,
    "emb_dim": 64,
    "use_layer_emb": false,
    "use_comp_emb": false,
    "use_hessian_diag": true
  },
  "training": {
    "sup_steps": 12000,
    "sup_lr": 0.001,
    "ft_lr": 0.0003,
    "ft_nsamples": 4,
    "rows_per_step": 400,
    "cascade_inner_steps": 300,
    "ft_mode": "cascade",
    "tau": 0.5,
    "prior_source": "sparsegpt",
    "wanda_residual_alpha": 2.0,
    "compensated_propagation": true,
    "use_weight_compensation": true,
    "train_on_compensated": true,
    "fixed_rows_count": 200,
    "fixed_rows_pos": "first",
    "dense_layers_list": []
  },
  "output": {
    "save_dir": "/home/ubuntu/hyperprune_work/outputs/hp-gptoss_20b-4to8",
    "wanda_dir": "/home/ubuntu/hyperprune_work/outputs/hp-gptoss_20b-4to8_ref",
    "preserve_wanda_dir": false
  }
}

Measured

Two things to know before comparing this number to the paper

1. Every decoder layer is pruned here. HyperPrune's own shipped configs set dense_layers_list: [0, 1] , leaving 2 layers fully dense and yielding ~46.9 % sparsity rather than 50 %. This checkpoint prunes every layer, matching BLADE's four_eight_experts spec, so it is a true 4:8 model in the modules BLADE prunes.

2. Only a few percent of this mask was chosen by the hypernet. The shipped recipe sets fixed_rows_count: 200 , so the hypernet decides the mask for the first 200 output rows of each projection and every remaining row keeps the SparseGPT prior's mask verbatim. This is HyperPrune's own default, kept here deliberately because the brief was to change nothing but the calibration corpus.

The two perplexity rows are different quantities and are not comparable to each other. The first is token-level PPL over concatenated WikiText-2 at seqlen 2048 (the Wanda/SparseGPT convention). The second is lm-evaluation-harness word_perplexity at max_length=2048 , which is BLADE's protocol — pinned empirically by reproducing BLADE's dense LLaMA-2-7B value of 9.19 (measured 9.1915).

Provenance

Produced from HyperPrune commit 6d093d7 with a small set of documented patches (bias-dtype autocast, calibration loader, disk-peak reduction, and — for 4:8 checkpoints — the N:M generalization, which the reference implementation does not ship). See the reproduction report for the full diff.