AMD's Radeon 780M vs GTX 1650: Can it Outperform?
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- AMD Integrated Graphics vs Intel CPUs
- The Dominance of AMD Ryzen 6000 Mobile Processors
- The Disappointing Benchmark Results of the Ryzen 7940 HS
- A Comparison with Budget GPUs
- The Potential of AMD's IGPU
- Intel's Next-Generation Battle Mage GPUs
- The XC2 Architecture and Split Solutions
- The Future of Intel IGPU
- The AMD vs Intel Mobile CPU Battle
- The Performance of AMD Ryzen 97845 HX
- The Anticipated Raptor Lake CPUs
- The Competition between AMD and Intel
- Conclusion
AMD's Integrated Graphics Dominance in the Mobile Market 💥
In the world of integrated graphics, AMD has proven its superiority over Intel. Whether you're using an AMD APU on your desktop or laptop, it consistently outperforms Intel CPUs in this department. One of the latest additions to the AMD family is the Ryzen 6000 mobile processors, also known as Rembrandt APUs. These processors have taken the mobile market by storm with their RDNA 2-based iGPUs. In fact, the improvements in these integrated graphics are so significant that they can even rival budget GPUs. However, recent leaked benchmark results have dampened our expectations for the upcoming flagship laptop APUs. Let's take a closer look at the details.
The Disappointing Benchmark Results of the Ryzen 7940 HS
A user named Golden Pick recently shared some screenshots on the Billy Billy Forum, revealing the 3DMark Time Spy score of the new Ryzen 7940 HS with Radeon 780m iGPU. According to the user's test results, the graphic score of the 780m at 64 watts is 2791. However, at a lower TDP of 25 watts, the score drops by 12 to 2486. While the iGPU might seem impressive at such a low TDP, a comparison to current budget GPUs tells a different story. The 780m is nearly equivalent to the 680m, which scores 2732 with a Ryzen 6900HS. This means that theoretically, the 780m won't even perform as well as a GTX 1650, and you can probably only play games on medium settings at 1080p resolution. It's undeniable that the iGPU still delivers impressive results, especially when considering the significant power consumption savings. However, in comparison to the 680m, the 780m falls short of expectations, especially considering that it is the flagship mobile APU.
Intel's Next-Generation Battle Mage GPUs
While AMD continues to dominate the integrated graphics market, Intel is not far behind. In a recent interview with Hardware Lux, Tom Peterson from Intel confirmed the upcoming XC2 architecture. This architecture will be split between the LPG and HPG solutions, similar to the Alchemist GPUs. The low-performance XC2 LPG architecture will be used on X10 CPUs, while the XC2 HPG architecture will power the Battle Mage discrete graphics cards. It's worth noting that the XC2 LPG is unlikely to be featured in the Meteor Lake CPUs, which will be the first to have a chiplet design with a dedicated GFX chip. This suggests that the XC2 LPG will most likely be available on Intel's Lunar Lake processors. Although we don't have specific details about the performance of Intel's IGPU, it's highly unlikely that they will surpass AMD's latest desktop and mobile IGPU offerings. The battle between the two competitors in the IGPU category is inevitable. However, the new mobile CPU war is already in full swing.
The AMD vs Intel Mobile CPU Battle
Currently, the fastest mobile CPU from AMD is the 8-core, 16-thread Ryzen 6900HX. On the other HAND, Intel offers the Core i9-12900HX, which easily surpasses the Ryzen 6900HX in synthetic tests. However, PassMark's database was recently updated with the Ryzen 97845HX CPU, which achieved an impressive score of 46,791 points. Compared to the i9-12900HX and the i9-12950AZX, the Ryzen 97845HX performs 31% and 41% faster, respectively. This CPU is almost 90% faster than the Ryzen 6900HX. The higher core and thread count of the Ryzen 97845HX contribute significantly to its superior performance. However, it's quite possible that Intel's upcoming Raptor Lake CPUs, including the i9-3900 and the i9-3950HX, will outperform the Ryzen 97845HX due to an even higher core count. AMD also has the faster 7945HX processor with 16 cores and 32 Threads, making it challenging for Intel to claim a substantial victory.
The battle for the fastest CPU will be intriguing to witness. However, it's also worth mentioning that the mid-range options, including the 7745HX and 7645HX, are equally important. Understanding the performance of these processors will help determine their market appeal. In any case, both AMD and Intel are showcasing their commitment to delivering high-performance CPUs for laptops. Pre-orders for laptops featuring the Intel i9-3900HX CPUs and Nvidia's high-end RTX 4080 and 4090 GPUs have already begun, while the first batch of AMD 7000-series-based laptops will start shipping this month. These laptops will offer four different 7000 processors, including the 7845HX and the flagship 7945HX.
In conclusion, the race for the fastest CPU is far from over. While AMD currently holds a strong position in terms of integrated graphics and mobile processors, Intel is making moves to catch up. Both companies have exciting offerings on the horizon, and it will be fascinating to see who emerges as the ultimate winner in this fast-paced technological battle.
Highlights:
- AMD's integrated graphics dominate over Intel CPUs
- Leaked benchmark results of Ryzen 7940 HS Present a disappointingly comparable performance to budget GPUs
- AMD's mobile APUs provide impressive power consumption savings while delivering significant graphical improvements
- Intel's next-generation Battle Mage GPUs split into LPG and HPG solutions
- The upcoming XC2 architecture aims to compete with AMD's integrated graphics but is unlikely to surpass them
- The mobile CPU battle between AMD and Intel is intensifying, with newer processors surpassing previous performance levels
- The Ryzen 97845HX sets a new benchmark in terms of CPU performance, but Intel's Raptor Lake CPUs may challenge its position
- The mid-range options are equally important for both AMD and Intel to succeed in the laptop market
FAQ:
Q: How does AMD's integrated graphics compare to Intel CPUs?
A: AMD's integrated graphics outperform Intel CPUs in terms of both desktop and mobile devices.
Q: Are the benchmark results of the Ryzen 7940 HS disappointing?
A: The leaked benchmark results of the Ryzen 7940 HS show comparable performance to budget GPUs, which may be disappointing for some.
Q: Can the Radeon 780m replace a budget GPU?
A: While the Radeon 780m offers significant improvements in iGPU performance, it may not surpass budget GPUs in terms of graphical capability.
Q: Is Intel catching up in the integrated graphics market?
A: Intel is working on the XC2 architecture for its next-generation Battle Mage GPUs, but it's unlikely to surpass AMD's latest offerings.
Q: Who currently holds the fastest mobile CPU title?
A: The Ryzen 6900HX from AMD and the Core i9-12900HX from Intel are the current contenders for the fastest mobile CPU.
Q: What upcoming processors can we expect from AMD and Intel?
A: AMD will release the 7000 series processors, including the 7845HX and the flagship 7945HX. Intel will introduce Raptor Lake CPUs, such as the i9-3900HX and the i9-3950HX.
Q: When will the new CPUs and GPUs be available in laptops?
A: Laptops featuring the new CPUs from both AMD and Intel, as well as Nvidia's high-end RTX 4080 and 4090 GPUs, are already available for pre-order.
Resources:
No difficulty
WHY YOU SHOULD CHOOSE TOOLIFY
