Gaming Performance with Integrated Graphics: Intel i7 1165G7 | Asus VivoBook15

Gaming Performance with Integrated Graphics: Intel i7 1165G7 | Asus VivoBook15

Table of Contents:

1. Introduction
2. Overview of Integrated Vega Graphics
3. Comparison between Vega Graphics and Iris X Graphics
4. Performance of Series 5000 Integrated Graphics
5. Pros and Cons of Integrated Vega Graphics
6. Introduction to Frijoles Store and Software Keys
7. Advantages and Disadvantages of OEM Keys
8. Performance testing of VivoBook 15 Laptop
9. Gaming Performance with Integrated Iris X Graphics
10. Benchmark Results and Recommended Settings
11. Conclusion

Introduction

In recent years, the performance of integrated graphics has significantly improved, especially with the introduction of the Vega graphics series. This has led to a debate regarding the competitiveness of Intel's integrated Iris X graphics against AMD's Vega graphics from the Series 5000. In this article, we will explore these arguments and delve into the gaming capabilities of the iris X graphics with a thorough performance test using the VivoBook 15 laptop. But before we begin, let's take a moment to thank our sponsor, Frijoles - a trusted software key provider with over 15 years of experience in the market. They offer Windows 10 Home or Professional keys at incredibly reduced prices compared to Microsoft's official stores. Please note that these keys are OEM and are tied to your motherboard. Now, let's dive into the world of integrated graphics and gaming performance.

Overview of Integrated Vega Graphics

Integrated graphics have come a long way in terms of performance and capabilities. The integration of Vega graphics in AMD processors has been a Game-changer, providing gamers with enhanced graphics performance without the need for a dedicated graphics card. The Vega graphics from the Series 5000 have been particularly impressive, offering improved frequencies and execution units compared to their predecessors. However, Intel decided to take a different approach and introduced their own integrated graphics solution called Iris X. In the following sections, we will compare the performance of these two graphics solutions and see how they stack up against each other.

Comparison between Vega Graphics and Iris X Graphics

When comparing Vega graphics from the AMD Series 5000 to Intel's Iris X graphics, it becomes clear that there are some noticeable differences in terms of performance and capabilities. The Iris X graphics of the Y71165G7 model, one of the most advanced variants, offers slightly higher frequencies compared to the Iris X 61135G7, which operates at a lower range with reduced execution units. It's important to note that these differences might not have a significant impact on real-world gaming performance, as we will discuss in the next section.

Performance of Series 5000 Integrated Graphics

Now, let's dive into the gaming performance of the VivoBook 15 laptop equipped with integrated iris X graphics. For our tests, we set the resolution to 1080p with medium to low graphics settings, aiming for a balance between performance and visual quality. On average, we achieved around 47 frames per Second (FPS) in most games, with slight drops to under 40 FPS when there were many on-screen units. In team-based games, the FPS could drop to around 50, which was still playable but lacked stability. It's worth mentioning that even though we did not reach a consistent 60 FPS, the gaming experience was smooth and enjoyable.

Pros and Cons of Integrated Vega Graphics

Before we proceed with further performance testing and analysis, let's summarize the pros and cons of using integrated Vega graphics. The advantages include improved performance compared to previous generations, cost-effectiveness by eliminating the need for a dedicated graphics card, and the ability to handle most modern games at satisfactory frame rates. On the other hand, the downsides of integrated Vega graphics include the limited graphical capabilities for high-end gaming and the inability to reach stable 60 FPS in certain demanding games. However, it is important to consider your gaming requirements and budget when deciding whether integrated graphics are suitable for your needs.

Introduction to Frijoles Store and Software Keys

Now, let's take a moment to learn more about Frijoles, our sponsor for this video. Frijoles is a trusted store that specializes in providing software keys at significantly reduced prices compared to official Microsoft stores. With over 15 years of experience in the market, Frijoles offers Windows 10 Home or Professional keys that are compatible with a wide range of devices. It's important to note that the keys provided by Frijoles are OEM keys, which means they are tied to the motherboard of your computer. This ensures a seamless activation process and significant cost savings compared to purchasing keys directly from Microsoft.

Advantages and Disadvantages of OEM Keys

While OEM keys offer substantial cost savings, it is important to consider their advantages and disadvantages. The main advantage is the significantly reduced price compared to retail keys, making them a more affordable option for many users. These keys are also Instantly delivered after purchase, eliminating the need to wait for physical shipment. However, the main disadvantage is that OEM keys are tied to the motherboard of your computer, limiting their transferability. It's important to make an informed decision based on your specific needs and preferences.

Performance Testing of VivoBook 15 Laptop

Now, let's dive into the performance testing of the VivoBook 15 laptop equipped with integrated iris X graphics. This particular model was chosen for its popularity and affordability in the market. The performance tests were conducted using various popular games and esports titles, with a focus on achieving a balance between graphical quality and frame rates. Our aim was to determine the optimal settings for an enjoyable gaming experience. Detailed results and analysis will be provided in the following sections.

Gaming Performance with Integrated Iris X Graphics

In our gaming performance tests, we set the resolution to 1080p and adjusted the graphics settings to a mix of medium and low. The average frame rates achieved varied depending on the game and specific settings, but generally ranged from 30 to 70 FPS. In less demanding games and specific scenes, frame rates could reach or exceed 60 FPS, providing a smooth gaming experience. However, in more graphically demanding games or intense team-based scenarios, frame rates would drop to around 50 FPS, still maintaining playability but with some occasional instability.

Benchmark Results and Recommended Settings

Based on our benchmark results, we can recommend specific settings for optimal gaming performance with integrated iris X graphics. For games that require higher frame rates, we suggest using a resolution of 720p with graphics set to low. This configuration can provide a stable 60 FPS in most cases. However, for more visually demanding games, a resolution of 1080p with graphics set to medium may achieve around 30 FPS, which still allows for an enjoyable gaming experience. It's important to note that finding the right balance between graphics quality and frame rates depends on personal preferences and the specific game being played.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the performance and capabilities of integrated graphics, specifically AMD's Vega graphics and Intel's Iris X graphics, have significantly improved over the years. While AMD's Vega graphics from the Series 5000 offer impressive performance and execution units, Intel's Iris X graphics provide a viable alternative for gamers on a budget. Despite some limitations, such as the inability to reach stable 60 FPS in demanding games, integrated graphics can still provide an enjoyable gaming experience. Additionally, with the availability of affordable OEM software keys from Frijoles, users can further enhance their gaming setups while staying within a reasonable budget.