Powerful Mining Performance with ASRock a750 - Kaspa, Ergo, ETC, Alephium

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Background on ASRock a750
3. Performance and Power Consumption
   • 3.1. Caspa with K-Heavy Hatch Algorithm
   • 3.2. Lithium
   • 3.3. Ergo with Auto Lycos 2 Algorithm
   • 3.4. Ethereum Classic with SRB Miner
4. Comparisons to Nvidia and AMD Cards
5. Pricing and Competitiveness
6. Potential Improvements and Future Updates
7. Conclusion

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the performance and power consumption of the ASRock a750 graphics card. This card has gained attention due to its recent price reduction and Intel's entry into the market. We will examine its performance in various mining algorithms and compare it to other cards on the market. Additionally, we will discuss the card's potential and how it stacks up against competitors. Finally, we will consider Intel's future plans and the implications for the mining community.

Background on ASRock a750

Before diving into the performance details, it is important to provide some background on the ASRock a750 graphics card. This card is part of Intel's lineup and has seen significant progress in terms of driver updates and compatible mining software. Although the card's production initially faced some challenges, it has shown potential for miners. Now, let's explore its performance more closely.

Performance and Power Consumption

3.1. Caspa with K-Heavy Hatch Algorithm

When mining with the Caspa algorithm using the K-Heavy Hatch algorithm, the ASRock a750 can achieve approximately 386 Mega hashes at a power setting of 180 Watts. However, this performance comes at a high cost of 261 Watts. If the power is reduced to 90 Watts, the card slows down to 231 Mega hashes while consuming approximately 100 Watts. From an efficiency standpoint, the ASRock a750 falls short.

3.2. Lithium

Mining with the Lithium algorithm, the ASRock a750 achieves approximately 1.53 gigahashes at a power draw of 261 Watts. This performance is similar to the RTX 3070 TI. When the power is reduced to 90 Watts, the card slows down to 932 Mega hashes, drawing a reduced power of about 100 Watts. Interestingly, we see that regardless of the algorithm, performance largely remains the same while power consumption varies.

3.3. Ergo with Auto Lycos 2 Algorithm

Switching to the Ergo algorithm with the Auto Lycos 2 algorithm, the ASRock a750 achieves approximately 123 Mega hashes at a power limit of 180 Watts. Surprisingly, the power draw decreases to 197 Watts compared to previous algorithms. When the power limit is reduced to 90 Watts, the GPU achieves 109 Mega hashes while consuming only 100 Watts. From an efficiency standpoint, this algorithm stands out.

3.4. Ethereum Classic with SRB Miner

Using SRB Miner on Ethereum Classic, the ASRock a750 achieves just over 50 Mega hashes at a power setting of 180 Watts. This performance is respectable but not amazing, similar to the RX 6700 from AMD. When set to 90 Watts, the card slows down to approximately 36 Mega hashes. Although power consumption is reduced, performance takes a hit.

Comparisons to Nvidia and AMD Cards

In terms of performance comparisons, the ASRock a750 can be considered competitive with the RTX 3060 from Nvidia and the RX 6600 XT from AMD. However, when it comes to power consumption and efficiency, the ASRock a750 falls short. Intel has some catching up to do in order to be on par with its competitors in terms of mining performance.

Pricing and Competitiveness

Considering current pricing, Intel does not seem to be prioritizing competitiveness with other mining cards. AMD, on the other HAND, offers some options below three hundred dollars that are worth considering. However, it is important to note that Intel's cards may see improvements in both productivity and efficiency with further development and driver updates. Intel cannot afford to overlook the opportunity to make money in the development of web 3 technologies.

Potential Improvements and Future Updates

It is fair to allow for the ASRock a750 and other Intel cards to mature over time. This includes both improvements from Intel itself and driver updates, as well as support from developers of mining software. The ASRock a750 can currently be considered a viable option for miners, but there is room for improvement in terms of efficiency and performance. Miners should stay informed about future updates and improvements from Intel.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the ASRock a750 graphics card shows promise in terms of performance but falls short in terms of power consumption and efficiency. While it can compete with certain Nvidia and AMD cards, Intel has some catching up to do in the mining market. Price-wise, Intel is not as competitive as AMD, but improvements can be expected in the future. Miners should keep an eye on Intel's developments in order to make informed decisions.