Unlocking the Power of Intel Arc A380: Discover its Impressive Hashrates

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

2. Specs of the Intel Arc A380 GPU

• 2.1 Total Board Power
• 2.2 Memory Specifications

  3. Review of the ASRock Challenger Edition

• 3.1 Issues with Challenger Editions
• 3.2 Single Fan Design

  4. Miners used for Testing

• 4.1 SRB Miner version 2.2.3
• 4.2 Nanominer

  5. Hashrates for Different Algorithms

• 5.1 Lithium
• 5.2 Dynex
• 5.3 Ergo
• 5.4 Ethereum Classic
• 5.5 Pharaoh
• 5.6 Raven Coin
• 5.7 Iron Fish (Blake 3)
• 5.8 Caspa
• 5.9 Ravencoin

  6. Profitability Analysis

• 6.1 Calculating Profitability
• 6.2 Most Profitable Coin

  7. Conclusion

Introduction

Hey, what's up Sons? It's Blind Red with Son of a Tech once again, and today we are diving into the updated hash rates of the Intel Arc A380 GPU. The previous videos covering the hash rates are outdated, and we need to test more algorithms that supposedly work with this GPU. In this article, we will explore the specifications of the Intel Arc A380, review the ASRock Challenger Edition, discuss the miners used for testing, analyze the hash rates for different algorithms, and evaluate the profitability of mining with this GPU. So, let's dive right into it!

Specs of the Intel Arc A380 GPU

The Intel Arc A380 is the lowest-end, discrete GPU available from Intel. It has a total board power of 75 Watts, making it an energy-efficient option. When it comes to memory specifications, the A380 has 6 gigabytes of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 186 gigabytes per Second of bandwidth. These specifications set the foundation for evaluating the performance of this GPU in mining operations.

Review of the ASRock Challenger Edition

The ASRock Challenger Edition is the specific model of the Intel Arc A380 that we will be testing. However, it is important to note that previous experience with Challenger editions has raised concerns. This particular model features a single fan design, which is an update compared to the dual fan design seen in previous Challenger Series GPUs. However, the fan design has been a cause of concern in the past, so durability and performance will need to be closely monitored. Notably, the GPU lacks a backplate, which eliminates potential worries about backplate compatibility.

Miners used for Testing

To evaluate the hash rates of the Intel Arc A380, we utilized SRB Miner version 2.2.3 for a majority of the algorithms, including ET hash and more. Additionally, thanks to a new release from Nanominer, we were able to test Prague Pal, specifically Pharaoh Proof of Work, and Raven Coin. These miners will help us understand the performance of the A380 across various algorithms.

Hashrates for Different Algorithms

Lithium

For the Lithium algorithm, which was tested using SRB Miner, the Intel Arc A380 achieved a hash rate of 432 Mega Hash per second (MH/s). It is important to note that GPU1 represents the A380 in all the screenshots, while GPU0 represents the A750. No overclocking capability was available for the A380, resulting in a consistent power consumption of 119 Watts.

Dynex

Unfortunately, support for Dynex on both the A380 and A750 GPUs was challenging to achieve. After numerous attempts, a measly hash rate of 1 Hash per second (H/s) was attained. Enabling the CPU, an Intel 11900K processor, resulted in an even worse hash rate of 0.8 H/s. As of now, Dynex proves to be a disappointment on both GPUs.

Ergo

The Ergo algorithm encountered a dreaded error during testing. The message "Couldn't create data set for Block" prevented mining on Block 9645436 with GPU1. This error is beyond the scope of SRB Miner and requires a fix from elsewhere. Thus, it was impossible to determine the hash rate for Ergo.

Ethereum Classic

On the positive side, the A380 achieved a hash rate of 14.76 MH/s for Ethereum Classic (ETC). This was achieved at a power consumption of 120 Watts. While the hash rate was satisfactory, the profitability of ETC mining needs to be evaluated further.

Pharaoh

Regrettably, Pharaoh mining was not feasible on the A380 due to insufficient memory on the GPU. Although it has 6 gigabytes of memory, the epoch requirement for Pharaoh exceeds the available capacity. Further testing with the latest Linux kernel may be attempted, but the prospects appear dim.

Raven Coin

The hash rate for Raven Coin was recorded at 19.75 MH/s on the A380. The power consumption remained consistent at 120 Watts, indicating a standardized performance for this algorithm. Raven Coin's profitability will be further explored in the subsequent sections.

Iron Fish (Blake 3)

Excitingly, SRB Miner added support for Blake 3, specifically Iron Fish. While the exact profitability of Iron Fish cannot be determined due to the absence of pricing information at the time of Recording, the A380 achieved a hash rate of 936 MH/s at 120 Watts. This indicates promising potential for mining this algorithm once more details are available.

Caspa

To assess the hash rate for Caspa, the A380 achieved a rate of 119 MH/s at a power consumption of 120 Watts. While the hash rate was respectable, profitability calculations will shed more light on the potential return on investment.

Ravencoin

Ravencoin mining on the A380 resulted in a hash rate of 6.7 MH/s at 120 Watts. Similar to other algorithms, the power consumption remained constant. Profitability calculations will provide a clearer picture of the viability of mining Ravencoin with the A380.

Profitability Analysis

Calculating the profitability of mining with the Intel Arc A380 requires considering various factors such as electricity costs and hash rates. Let's analyze the profitability for different algorithms tested.

For Lithium, the A380 achieved a hash rate of 432 MH/s at 120 Watts. Considering an electricity cost of 13 cents per kilowatt-hour, the mining operation would result in a loss of 25 cents per day.

Skipping Dynex due to its unsatisfactory performance, we move on to Ethereum Classic. With a hash rate of 14.76 MH/s at 120 Watts, the A380 mining ETC would yield a daily loss of 33 cents.

Caspa, with a hash rate of 119 MH/s at 120 Watts, would result in a daily loss of 30 cents.

Ravencoin, at a hash rate of 6.7 MH/s and 120 Watts, would lead to a daily loss of 28 cents.

The most profitable coin to mine on the A380, for now, is Lithium, although it still incurs losses. Ergo shows potential profitability according to online calculators, but our attempts to mine Ergo were unsuccessful due to unresolved errors.

Considering the current performance and profitability, the Intel Arc A380 may disappoint miners seeking a profitable venture.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Intel Arc A380 GPU did not live up to expectations in terms of hash rates and profitability during our testing. Dynex proved to be problematic, Ergo encountered errors, and Pharaoh lacked sufficient memory for mining. While Ethereum Classic, Raven Coin, and Caspa demonstrated decent hash rates, they all resulted in losses at current electricity costs.

On a positive note, SRB Miner's support for Blake 3 algorithms, specifically Iron Fish, presents a potentially profitable option. However, the profitability cannot be accurately measured without pricing information. As of now, the A380 falls short of being a viable choice for mining, but future updates and optimizations may improve its performance. Keep an eye out for further developments in the world of Intel Arc GPUs.