Boxes.dev VS Bloome
Boxes.dev VS Bloome 对比，Boxes.dev 和 Bloome 有什麼區別？
猜你喜歡
總結
Boxes.dev 總結
Cloud dev environments for agentic coding. Run each Claude Code or Codex chat on its own computer in the cloud, connect from mobile and desktop, and code from anywhere.
Boxes.dev 著陸頁
Bloome 總結
Bloome 著陸頁
比較詳情
Boxes.dev 詳細信息
| 類別 | AI 代理, AI 開發者工具, AI 程式碼助理, AI Copilot, 無程式碼與低程式碼開發 |
| Boxes.dev 網站 | https://boxes.dev?utm_source=toolify |
| 添加時間 | 2026年6月8日 |
| Boxes.dev 定價 | -- |
Bloome 詳細信息
| 類別 | AI 代理, AI聊天機器人, AI 生產力工具 |
| Bloome 網站 | https://bloome.im?utm_source=toolify |
| 添加時間 | 2026年6月23日 |
| Bloome 定價 | -- |
使用對比
如何使用Boxes.dev？
To use Boxes.dev, move your project codebase into a cloud devbox using the CLI command `dvb init`. The platform automatically scans your local dev environment and creates a setup plan. Once approved, a coding agent recreates your dev environment in the cloud. You can then fork the primary VM to run tasks on their own machines, start Codex or Claude Code, and review, steer, or ship code from mobile, desktop, or CLI surfaces.
如何使用Bloome？
To use Bloome, download the application for your preferred platform (macOS, Windows, iOS, Android) or sign up on the website. Create a workspace or group chat, discover and add AI agents with specific roles from the agent network library, and start collaborating with them by typing prompts. You can configure their permissions, connect your choice of AI models, and set up scheduled tasks to run automatically.
比較 Boxes.dev 和 Bloome 的優點
Boxes.dev 的核心功能
- Full cloud computer per agent with isolated filesystem, services, and database state
- Instant snapshots and forks for running multiple agents in parallel
- Persistent terminal sessions and continuous background execution when offline
- Multi-surface control supporting macOS desktop, iOS/Android mobile, and scriptable CLI
- Localhost port forwarding that automatically follows the selected fork
- Cloud scheduled and webhook automation triggers (e.g., via Slack or Linear)
Bloome 的核心功能
- Multi-agent collaboration within a single group chat
- Real-time debate among multiple AI agents from different angles
- Shared long-term memory for keeping context, decisions, and history
- Choice of flexible intelligence models including Claude Code, GPT-5.5, Gemini 3 Pro, and more
- Interactive rich content generation like tables, documents, and dashboards directly in chat
- Scheduled execution for recurring tasks, periodic monitoring, and automatic background reports
- Granular permission controls and isolated execution sandboxes for enterprise data security
比較用例
Boxes.dev 的用例
- Running multiple Claude Code or Codex tasks simultaneously on separate virtual machines
- Leaving complex coding agent tasks running overnight or while traveling without keeping a laptop open
- Reviewing agent threads, diffs, and approving or steering code changes directly from a smartphone
- Automating regular codebase tasks like weekly dependency audits triggered on a schedule
Bloome 的用例
- Product development teams can use a squad of Bug, Engineer, and QA agents to find issues, deploy fixes, and verify them in one chat room.
- Investment professionals can utilize Market and Research agents to track live market data, compile 3-month summaries, and fire automated risk alerts.
- Content creation teams can deploy Script, Visual, and Review agents to concurrently draft scripts, create storyboards/keyframes, and review pacing.
Boxes.dev 和 Bloome 之間的計劃不同
Boxes.dev
$0 / free
10 free box-hours, Main devbox + 2 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Bring your own Codex + Claude Code, Desktop, mobile, web, CLI
$19 / user / mo
40 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 4 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.75 / box-hour, Email support
$99 / user / mo
250 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 10 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.60 / box-hour, Priority support
Custom volume
Custom seat & box-hour pools, SSO, SCIM, RBAC, Audit logs and spend controls, Dedicated resources & deployment, Custom MSA, security review
Bloome
對不起，沒有數據
Boxes.dev 的流量
Boxes.dev 是月访问量為 0 且平均訪問時長為 00:00:00 的工具。 Boxes.dev 的每次訪問頁數為 0.00，跳出率為 0.00%。
最新網站流量
| 月訪問量 | 0 |
| 平均訪問時長 | 00:00:00 |
| 每次訪問頁數 | 0.00 |
| 跳出率 | 0.00% |
Bloome 的流量
Bloome 是月访问量為 63.4K 且平均訪問時長為 00:04:12 的工具。 Bloome 的每次訪問頁數為 4.74，跳出率為 37.76%。
最新網站流量
| 月訪問量 | 63.4K |
| 平均訪問時長 | 00:04:12 |
| 每次訪問頁數 | 4.74 |
| 跳出率 | 37.76% |
地理流量
對不起，沒有數據
地理流量
The top 5 countries/regions for Bloome are:China 67.14%, United States 15.75%, Singapore 5.10%, Hong Kong, China 4.86%, Taiwan, China 3.92%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 67.14% |
 | 15.75% |
 | 5.10% |
 | 4.86% |
 | 3.92% |
網站流量來源
Boxes.dev 的 6 個主要流量來源是：郵件 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, 直接 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, 引薦 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
郵件 | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
直接 | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
引薦 | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
網站流量來源
Bloome 的 6 個主要流量來源是：直接 69.92%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 13.83%, 引薦 12.37%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 3.11%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.48%, vs_sourcesGenAi 0.26%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.03%, 郵件 0.00%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%
直接 | 69.92% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 13.83% |
引薦 | 12.37% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 3.11% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.48% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0.26% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.03% |
郵件 | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
Boxes.dev 或 Bloome哪個更好？
Bloome 可能比 Boxes.dev 更受歡迎。如您所見，Boxes.dev 每月有 0 次訪問，而 Bloome 每月有 63.4K 次訪問。 所以更多的人選擇Bloome。 因此，人們很可能會在社交平台上更多地推薦 Bloome。
Boxes.dev 的平均訪問持續時間為 00:00:00，而 Bloome 的平均訪問持續時間為 00:04:12。 此外，Boxes.dev 的每次訪問頁面為 0.00，跳出率為 0.00%。 Bloome 的每次訪問頁面為 4.74，跳出率為 37.76%。
Bloome 的主要用戶是 China, United States, Singapore, Hong Kong, China, Taiwan, China，分佈如下：67.14%, 15.75%, 5.10%, 4.86%, 3.92%。
查看其他对比
精選*
