Boxes.dev VS Bloome
Compare Boxes.dev VS Bloome, what is the difference between Boxes.dev and Bloome?
You may like
Summarize
Boxes.dev summarize
Cloud dev environments for agentic coding. Run each Claude Code or Codex chat on its own computer in the cloud, connect from mobile and desktop, and code from anywhere.
Boxes.dev Landing Page
Bloome summarize
Bloome Landing Page
Compare Details
Boxes.dev details
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, AI Code Assistant, AI Copilot, No-Code&Low-Code |
| Boxes.dev Website | https://boxes.dev?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | June 08 2026 |
| Boxes.dev Pricing | -- |
Bloome details
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Chatbot, AI Productivity Tools |
| Bloome Website | https://bloome.im?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | June 23 2026 |
| Bloome Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Boxes.dev?
To use Boxes.dev, move your project codebase into a cloud devbox using the CLI command `dvb init`. The platform automatically scans your local dev environment and creates a setup plan. Once approved, a coding agent recreates your dev environment in the cloud. You can then fork the primary VM to run tasks on their own machines, start Codex or Claude Code, and review, steer, or ship code from mobile, desktop, or CLI surfaces.
How to use Bloome?
To use Bloome, download the application for your preferred platform (macOS, Windows, iOS, Android) or sign up on the website. Create a workspace or group chat, discover and add AI agents with specific roles from the agent network library, and start collaborating with them by typing prompts. You can configure their permissions, connect your choice of AI models, and set up scheduled tasks to run automatically.
Compare Pros between Boxes.dev and Bloome
Core features of Boxes.dev
- Full cloud computer per agent with isolated filesystem, services, and database state
- Instant snapshots and forks for running multiple agents in parallel
- Persistent terminal sessions and continuous background execution when offline
- Multi-surface control supporting macOS desktop, iOS/Android mobile, and scriptable CLI
- Localhost port forwarding that automatically follows the selected fork
- Cloud scheduled and webhook automation triggers (e.g., via Slack or Linear)
Core features of Bloome
- Multi-agent collaboration within a single group chat
- Real-time debate among multiple AI agents from different angles
- Shared long-term memory for keeping context, decisions, and history
- Choice of flexible intelligence models including Claude Code, GPT-5.5, Gemini 3 Pro, and more
- Interactive rich content generation like tables, documents, and dashboards directly in chat
- Scheduled execution for recurring tasks, periodic monitoring, and automatic background reports
- Granular permission controls and isolated execution sandboxes for enterprise data security
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Boxes.dev
- Running multiple Claude Code or Codex tasks simultaneously on separate virtual machines
- Leaving complex coding agent tasks running overnight or while traveling without keeping a laptop open
- Reviewing agent threads, diffs, and approving or steering code changes directly from a smartphone
- Automating regular codebase tasks like weekly dependency audits triggered on a schedule
Use cases for Bloome
- Product development teams can use a squad of Bug, Engineer, and QA agents to find issues, deploy fixes, and verify them in one chat room.
- Investment professionals can utilize Market and Research agents to track live market data, compile 3-month summaries, and fire automated risk alerts.
- Content creation teams can deploy Script, Visual, and Review agents to concurrently draft scripts, create storyboards/keyframes, and review pacing.
Different Plan between Boxes.dev and Bloome
Boxes.dev
$0 / free
10 free box-hours, Main devbox + 2 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Bring your own Codex + Claude Code, Desktop, mobile, web, CLI
$19 / user / mo
40 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 4 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.75 / box-hour, Email support
$99 / user / mo
250 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 10 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.60 / box-hour, Priority support
Custom volume
Custom seat & box-hour pools, SSO, SCIM, RBAC, Audit logs and spend controls, Dedicated resources & deployment, Custom MSA, security review
Bloome
Sorry, there are no data
Boxes.dev's traffic
Boxes.dev is the one with 0 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. Boxes.dev has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 0 |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
| Page per Visit | 0.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
Bloome's traffic
Bloome is the one with 63.4K monthly visits and 00:04:12 Avg.visit duration. Bloome has a Page per visit of 4.74 and a bounce rate of 37.76%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 63.4K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:04:12 |
| Page per Visit | 4.74 |
| Bounce Rate | 37.76% |
Geography
Sorry, there are no data
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Bloome are:China 67.14%, United States 15.75%, Singapore 5.10%, Hong Kong, China 4.86%, Taiwan, China 3.92%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 67.14% |
 | 15.75% |
 | 5.10% |
 | 4.86% |
 | 3.92% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Boxes.dev are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Bloome are:Direct 69.92%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 13.83%, Referrals 12.37%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 3.11%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.48%, vs_sourcesGenAi 0.26%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.03%, Mail 0.00%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%
Direct | 69.92% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 13.83% |
Referrals | 12.37% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 3.11% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.48% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0.26% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.03% |
Mail | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
Which is better: Boxes.dev or Bloome?
Bloome might be a bit more popular than Boxes.dev.As you can see, Boxes.dev has 0 monthly visits, while Bloome has 63.4K monthly visits. So more people choose Bloome. So the odds are that people will recommend Bloome more on social platforms.
Boxes.dev has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00, while Bloome has an Avg.visit duration of 00:04:12. Also, Boxes.dev has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%. Bloome has a page per visit of 4.74 and a Bounce Rate of 37.76%.
The main users of Bloome are China, United States, Singapore, Hong Kong, China, Taiwan, China, with the following distribution: 67.14%, 15.75%, 5.10%, 4.86%, 3.92%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
