Activepieces VS Jinba
Compare Activepieces VS Jinba, what is the difference between Activepieces and Jinba?
You may like
Summarize
Activepieces summarize
Activepieces Landing Page
Jinba summarize
Jinba is an AI workflow automation platform combining a visual builder (Jinba Flow) and runtime (Jin.
Jinba Landing Page
Compare Details
Activepieces details
| Categories | AI Workflow, No-Code&Low-Code, AI Code Assistant, AI Agent, Open Source AI Models, AI Chatbot, AI Developer Tools, AI Copilot |
| Activepieces Website | https://www.activepieces.com?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | April 21 2025 |
| Activepieces Pricing | -- |
Jinba details
| Categories | AI Workflow, AI Agent, AI API, No-Code&Low-Code |
| Jinba Website | https://jinba.io?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | August 06 2026 |
| Jinba Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Activepieces?
Use Activepieces to automate workflows by connecting to hundreds of apps, creating AI agents, building chat experiences, and using AI-assisted code. Teams can collaborate on building and deploying automations while maintaining governance and security.
How to use Jinba?
Describe the desired workflow in plain language inside Jinba Flow, such as sending weekly metrics to Slack. Jinba generates the workflow, which can then be refined in the visual editor or YAML. Test it with real data, review execution results, configure integrations and permissions, and deploy it as an API or MCP server. Team members can execute and interact with deployed workflows through Jinba App.
Compare Pros between Activepieces and Jinba
Core features of Activepieces
- No-code automation builder
- AI-assisted code
- AI Pieces for creating AI agents
- Collaboration tools for team innovation
- Governance and compliance features
- Webhook and HTTP triggers
- Version control and management tools
- Custom templates and whitelabeling options
Core features of Jinba
- Natural-language, visual, and YAML-based workflow building
- Workflow testing and real-time debugging with execution previews
- Deployment as APIs or MCP servers
- Enterprise security with SOC 2 compliance, encryption, SSO, RBAC, and audit logging
- On-premises and private cloud deployment
- 100+ pre-built integrations and custom connectors
- Support for AWS Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, Meta Llama, Claude, GPT-4 Turbo, and self-hosted models
- Conditional logic and dynamic workflow routing
- Team workspaces, permissions, approvals, and organization management
- Dedicated engineer support for enterprise workflow development
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Activepieces
- Automate HR processes
- Streamline financial workflows
- Enhance marketing campaigns
- Improve sales operations
- Request approvals via forms
- Build chat experiences with advanced logic
- Brand the builder with custom colors and logos
Use cases for Jinba
- Automate loan screening with policy rules, dynamic routing, data enrichment, and compliance audit trails
- Automate insurance underwriting and claims processing
- Validate remittances for banking and financial services
- Automate manufacturing knowledge management
- Review and analyze legal contracts
- Generate sales quotes and automate quotation workflows
- Schedule meetings and automate procurement processes
- Create HR intake workflows
- Send scheduled business metrics to Slack
- Build biomedical data analysis workflows with existing MCPs
Different Plan between Activepieces and Jinba
Activepieces
Free
Run unlimited tasks for free
Fraction of Zapier or Workato cost
Use Activepieces Cloud
Jinba
$0 per month
For individuals getting started. Includes 2 team members, 2 workspaces, 10 workflow creations, 100 daily Copilot requests, unlimited private API endpoints, and 1,000 API Jinba Credits.
Custom
For large organizations. Includes custom team members and workspaces, unlimited workflow creation, custom daily Copilot requests, unlimited private API endpoints, API Jinba Credits, and on-premises deployment.
Activepieces's traffic
Activepieces is the one with 240.1K monthly visits and 00:03:08 Avg.visit duration. Activepieces has a Page per visit of 3.98 and a bounce rate of 39.14%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 240.1K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:03:08 |
| Page per Visit | 3.98 |
| Bounce Rate | 39.14% |
Jinba's traffic
Jinba is the one with 11.9K monthly visits and 00:00:32 Avg.visit duration. Jinba has a Page per visit of 1.85 and a bounce rate of 41.09%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 11.9K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:32 |
| Page per Visit | 1.85 |
| Bounce Rate | 41.09% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Activepieces are:United States 28.77%, India 7.80%, Jordan 5.81%, Philippines 5.26%, Mexico 3.52%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 28.77% |
 | 7.80% |
 | 5.81% |
 | 5.26% |
 | 3.52% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Jinba are:United States 27.60%, Japan 19.11%, India 16.84%, United Kingdom 14.01%, Brazil 8.53%
Top 5 Countries/regions
| 27.60% |
 | 19.11% |
| 16.84% |
 | 14.01% |
 | 8.53% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Activepieces are:Direct 40.19%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 38.90%, Referrals 10.98%, vs_sourcesGenAi 4.53%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 3.55%, Mail 1.78%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.06%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.00%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%
Direct | 40.19% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 38.90% |
Referrals | 10.98% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 4.53% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 3.55% |
Mail | 1.78% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.06% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Jinba are:Direct 46.56%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 29.33%, Referrals 16.35%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 7.77%, Mail 0.00%, vs_sourcesGenAi 0.00%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.00%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.00%
Direct | 46.56% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 29.33% |
Referrals | 16.35% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 7.77% |
Mail | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.00% |
Which is better: Activepieces or Jinba?
Activepieces might be a bit more popular than Jinba.As you can see, Activepieces has 240.1K monthly visits, while Jinba has 11.9K monthly visits. So more people choose Activepieces. So the odds are that people will recommend Activepieces more on social platforms.
Activepieces has an Avg.visit duration of 00:03:08, while Jinba has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:32. Also, Activepieces has a page per visit of 3.98 and a Bounce Rate of 39.14%. Jinba has a page per visit of 1.85 and a Bounce Rate of 41.09%.
The main users of Activepieces are United States, India, Jordan, Philippines, Mexico, with the following distribution: 28.77%, 7.80%, 5.81%, 5.26%, 3.52%.
The main users of Jinba are United States, Japan, India, United Kingdom, Brazil, with the following distribution: 27.60%, 19.11%, 16.84%, 14.01%, 8.53%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
