Boxes.dev VS WorkClaws
Compare Boxes.dev VS WorkClaws, what is the difference between Boxes.dev and WorkClaws?
You may like
Summarize
Boxes.dev summarize
Cloud dev environments for agentic coding. Run each Claude Code or Codex chat on its own computer in the cloud, connect from mobile and desktop, and code from anywhere.
Boxes.dev Landing Page
WorkClaws summarize
Meet the AI team for your team. WorkClaws are collaborative, proactive AI coworkers who work in Slack and Microsoft Teams just like every other colleague. They're fully customizable to get work done your way by learning skills and routines. Unlike most AI products that pair one person with one assistant, WorkClaws can collaborate 24/7 with your whole team. Each Claw has a job title, a manager in your org chart, and a cloud-hosted ClawOS computer with the ability to access more than 3,000 apps.
WorkClaws Landing Page
Compare Details
Boxes.dev details
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, AI Code Assistant, AI Copilot, No-Code&Low-Code |
| Boxes.dev Website | https://boxes.dev?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | June 08 2026 |
| Boxes.dev Pricing | -- |
WorkClaws details
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Assistant, AI Workflow |
| WorkClaws Website | https://www.workclaw.com?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | June 24 2026 |
| WorkClaws Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Boxes.dev?
To use Boxes.dev, move your project codebase into a cloud devbox using the CLI command `dvb init`. The platform automatically scans your local dev environment and creates a setup plan. Once approved, a coding agent recreates your dev environment in the cloud. You can then fork the primary VM to run tasks on their own machines, start Codex or Claude Code, and review, steer, or ship code from mobile, desktop, or CLI surfaces.
How to use WorkClaws?
To use WorkClaws, teams can sign up for free and set up AI coworkers (Claws) within minutes using a cloud-hosted, one-click configuration. Users assign job titles and managers to their Claws, and then add them to team communication channels like Slack or Teams. From there, users can turn standard workflows into custom skills simply by chatting with the Claw, install pre-built skill packs from the library, and share those automated skills, credentials, or application connections across the entire team.
Compare Pros between Boxes.dev and WorkClaws
Core features of Boxes.dev
- Full cloud computer per agent with isolated filesystem, services, and database state
- Instant snapshots and forks for running multiple agents in parallel
- Persistent terminal sessions and continuous background execution when offline
- Multi-surface control supporting macOS desktop, iOS/Android mobile, and scriptable CLI
- Localhost port forwarding that automatically follows the selected fork
- Cloud scheduled and webhook automation triggers (e.g., via Slack or Linear)
Core features of WorkClaws
- Collaborative and proactive AI coworkers that work in Slack and Microsoft Teams
- Dedicated cloud-hosted computer (ClawOS) for each Claw with independent specs
- Ability to learn and share custom skills or install pre-built workflow packs via chat
- Integration with over 3,000 apps including Google Workspace, Gmail, and CRM systems
- Enterprise security including SOC 2 Type II compliance, custom credential vault, and separate data isolation
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Boxes.dev
- Running multiple Claude Code or Codex tasks simultaneously on separate virtual machines
- Leaving complex coding agent tasks running overnight or while traveling without keeping a laptop open
- Reviewing agent threads, diffs, and approving or steering code changes directly from a smartphone
- Automating regular codebase tasks like weekly dependency audits triggered on a schedule
Use cases for WorkClaws
- Automate daily organizational workflows such as research, scheduling, data entry, and reporting directly in team chat apps.
- Deploy a fleet of 24/7 autonomous digital workers to handle inbox management and multi-CRM tasks while the human team is away.
Different Plan between Boxes.dev and WorkClaws
Boxes.dev
$0 / free
10 free box-hours, Main devbox + 2 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Bring your own Codex + Claude Code, Desktop, mobile, web, CLI
$19 / user / mo
40 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 4 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.75 / box-hour, Email support
$99 / user / mo
250 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 10 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.60 / box-hour, Priority support
Custom volume
Custom seat & box-hour pools, SSO, SCIM, RBAC, Audit logs and spend controls, Dedicated resources & deployment, Custom MSA, security review
WorkClaws
$29 / month
Shared across unlimited users. Includes 30,000 credits/month, +$100 of free additional credits per team, zero setup, access to Claude AI model, unlimited AI agents ('Claws'), pre-built or custom skills, 24/7 runtime with pause capability, and 100+ integrations.
Custom
For scaling teams. Includes everything in Team, plus volume-based discounts, Bring Your Own Key (BYOK), dedicated segregated infrastructure, security reviews/DPA/SOC 2 reports on request, SLA + priority support, dedicated onboarding manager, and advanced controls like SSO, audit logs, and role-based limits.
$20
Add 20,000 credits at any time with instant application and auto-refill options.
Boxes.dev's traffic
Boxes.dev is the one with 0 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. Boxes.dev has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 0 |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
| Page per Visit | 0.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
WorkClaws's traffic
WorkClaws is the one with 4.3K monthly visits and 00:00:21 Avg.visit duration. WorkClaws has a Page per visit of 1.62 and a bounce rate of 74.89%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 4.3K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:21 |
| Page per Visit | 1.62 |
| Bounce Rate | 74.89% |
Geography
Sorry, there are no data
Geography
The top 1 countries/regions for WorkClaws are:United States 100.00%
Top 1 Countries/regions
 | 100.00% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Boxes.dev are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to WorkClaws are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Which is better: Boxes.dev or WorkClaws?
WorkClaws might be a bit more popular than Boxes.dev.As you can see, Boxes.dev has 0 monthly visits, while WorkClaws has 4.3K monthly visits. So more people choose WorkClaws. So the odds are that people will recommend WorkClaws more on social platforms.
Boxes.dev has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00, while WorkClaws has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:21. Also, Boxes.dev has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%. WorkClaws has a page per visit of 1.62 and a Bounce Rate of 74.89%.
The main users of WorkClaws are United States, with the following distribution: 100.00%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
