Devin AI VS crystl
Compare Devin AI VS crystl, what is the difference between Devin AI and crystl?
You may like
Summarize
Devin AI summarize
Devin AI, the world's first autonomous AI engineer from Cognition Labs, streamlines development, enabling focus on complex engineering challenges.
Devin AI Landing Page
crystl summarize
crystl Landing Page
Compare Details
Devin AI details
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Code Generator, AI Code Assistant, AI Developer Tools, AI App Builder, AI Copilot, AI Task Management, Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Github |
| Devin AI Website | https://devinai.dev?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | March 17 2024 |
| Devin AI Pricing | -- |
crystl details
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Code Assistant, AI Developer Tools, AI Code Generator |
| crystl Website | https://crystl.dev?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | June 21 2026 |
| crystl Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Devin AI?
Devin AI is currently in early access. Interested users can apply for access through Cognition Labs' official channels. Once access is granted, users can integrate Devin AI into their development workflows to automate tasks, debug code, and build applications.
How to use crystl?
Download the app for macOS, organize your projects into 'gems', and launch your preferred CLI AI agents within isolated 'shards'. Use the built-in interface to track progress, handle approval requests, and manage multiple parallel agent sessions.
Compare Pros between Devin AI and crystl
Core features of Devin AI
- Autonomous software engineering
- Complex task management
- Contextual understanding and learning
- In-built code editor and shell
- Sandboxed compute environment
- Real-time progress reporting
- Feedback integration
- End-to-end app building
- Autonomous code debugging
- Handling GitHub repositories
- Fine-tuning Large Language Models
Core features of crystl
- Gems & shards project organization
- Parallel agent sessions with isolated git worktrees
- Unified approval panels, notifications, and session colors
- History navigator for searching across agent conversations and tool calls
- Scriptable CLI guild membership for shell-based orchestration
- Automatic session backup and restore
- Remote development tunnel via SSH with full interface feature support
- Starter bundles for pre-configuring instructions, rules, and MCP settings
- Project optimizer to scan and fix agent configuration gaps
- Crystl Quest for roundtable multi-agent orchestration
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Devin AI
- App development and deployment
- Bug detection and resolution
- AI model training
- Contributing to open-source projects
- Managing GitHub repositories
Use cases for crystl
- Running multiple AI agent instances simultaneously on the same repository without merge or state conflicts.
- Monitoring and approving AI tool calls and file system access from a single dashboard.
- Reviewing historical Claude Code conversations and commands across an entire project gem.
- Pre-configuring new development environments with standard CLAUDE.md files and MCP servers.
Different Plan between Devin AI and crystl
Devin AI
Sorry, there are no data
crystl
$0/forever
Includes isolated shards, MCP server config, API key storage, split view, history navigator, session autosave & restore, Metal GPU rendering, and facet inserts.
$85/year
Includes everything in Free, plus: up to 3 devices, prompt library integration, formations with session restore, CLI orchestration, crystl on iPhone (coming soon), and priority support.
Devin AI's traffic
Devin AI is the one with 0 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. Devin AI has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 0 |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
| Page per Visit | 0.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
crystl's traffic
crystl is the one with 62 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. crystl has a Page per visit of 1.09 and a bounce rate of 40.97%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 62 |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
| Page per Visit | 1.09 |
| Bounce Rate | 40.97% |
Geography
Sorry, there are no data
Geography
The top 2 countries/regions for crystl are:Poland 54.28%, United States 45.72%
Top 2 Countries/regions
 | 54.28% |
 | 45.72% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Devin AI are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to crystl are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Which is better: Devin AI or crystl?
crystl might be a bit more popular than Devin AI.As you can see, Devin AI has 0 monthly visits, while crystl has 62 monthly visits. So more people choose crystl. So the odds are that people will recommend crystl more on social platforms.
Devin AI has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00, while crystl has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00. Also, Devin AI has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%. crystl has a page per visit of 1.09 and a Bounce Rate of 40.97%.
The main users of crystl are Poland, United States, with the following distribution: 54.28%, 45.72%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
