EasyClaw VS Boxes.dev
Compare EasyClaw VS Boxes.dev, what is the difference between EasyClaw and Boxes.dev?
You may like
Summarize
EasyClaw summarize
The fastest way is using the EasyClaw desktop app. Its setup wizard will guide you through the essentials: picking an AI model provider (like Google or OpenAI) and connecting your chat apps (like WhatsApp or iMessage). Once the wizard is done, you just start the gateway from the app. Your agent comes online immediately, ready to talk in the chat apps you connected. For most users, this is all you need to do; no command-line or code is required.
EasyClaw Landing Page
Boxes.dev summarize
Cloud dev environments for agentic coding. Run each Claude Code or Codex chat on its own computer in the cloud, connect from mobile and desktop, and code from anywhere.
Boxes.dev Landing Page
Compare Details
EasyClaw details
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Assistant, AI Developer Tools, Open Source AI Models |
| EasyClaw Website | https://easyclaw.app?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | February 04 2026 |
| EasyClaw Pricing | -- |
Boxes.dev details
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, AI Code Assistant, AI Copilot, No-Code&Low-Code |
| Boxes.dev Website | https://boxes.dev?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | June 08 2026 |
| Boxes.dev Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use EasyClaw?
Users download the EasyClaw desktop app (available for macOS and Linux, with Windows coming soon). The embedded setup wizard guides the user through selecting an AI model provider (e.g., Google, OpenAI) and connecting their desired chat applications. Once configured, the user simply starts the gateway from the app, and the AI agent immediately becomes ready to interact via the connected chat platforms.
How to use Boxes.dev?
To use Boxes.dev, move your project codebase into a cloud devbox using the CLI command `dvb init`. The platform automatically scans your local dev environment and creates a setup plan. Once approved, a coding agent recreates your dev environment in the cloud. You can then fork the primary VM to run tasks on their own machines, start Codex or Claude Code, and review, steer, or ship code from mobile, desktop, or CLI surfaces.
Compare Pros between EasyClaw and Boxes.dev
Core features of EasyClaw
- One-click/paste, zero-friction installation for the OpenClaw stack.
- Bridges AI agents across major messaging platforms (WhatsApp, Signal, iMessage, Telegram, Discord, Slack).
- Runs everything locally on the user's hardware, ensuring data privacy.
- Supports multiple operating systems (macOS, Linux, Windows coming soon).
- Choice of AI provider (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, OpenRouter).
Core features of Boxes.dev
- Full cloud computer per agent with isolated filesystem, services, and database state
- Instant snapshots and forks for running multiple agents in parallel
- Persistent terminal sessions and continuous background execution when offline
- Multi-surface control supporting macOS desktop, iOS/Android mobile, and scriptable CLI
- Localhost port forwarding that automatically follows the selected fork
- Cloud scheduled and webhook automation triggers (e.g., via Slack or Linear)
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for EasyClaw
- Quickly installing the OpenClaw/ClawdBot/MoltBot AI stack without dealing with dependency errors or complex configuration.
- Setting up a local AI assistant for non-developers who are unfamiliar with the terminal.
- Running a single AI agent that can respond and manage tasks across multiple messaging services simultaneously.
- Deploying AI agents easily across community groups or small teams (e.g., Discord communities).
Use cases for Boxes.dev
- Running multiple Claude Code or Codex tasks simultaneously on separate virtual machines
- Leaving complex coding agent tasks running overnight or while traveling without keeping a laptop open
- Reviewing agent threads, diffs, and approving or steering code changes directly from a smartphone
- Automating regular codebase tasks like weekly dependency audits triggered on a schedule
Different Plan between EasyClaw and Boxes.dev
EasyClaw
Sorry, there are no data
Boxes.dev
$0 / free
10 free box-hours, Main devbox + 2 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Bring your own Codex + Claude Code, Desktop, mobile, web, CLI
$19 / user / mo
40 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 4 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.75 / box-hour, Email support
$99 / user / mo
250 included box-hours / mo, Main devbox + 10 awake forks, Unlimited sleeping forks, Prepaid overage at $0.60 / box-hour, Priority support
Custom volume
Custom seat & box-hour pools, SSO, SCIM, RBAC, Audit logs and spend controls, Dedicated resources & deployment, Custom MSA, security review
EasyClaw's traffic
EasyClaw is the one with 0 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. EasyClaw has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 0 |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
| Page per Visit | 0.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
Boxes.dev's traffic
Boxes.dev is the one with 0 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. Boxes.dev has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 0 |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
| Page per Visit | 0.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to EasyClaw are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Boxes.dev are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Which is better: EasyClaw or Boxes.dev?
Boxes.dev might be a bit more popular than EasyClaw.As you can see, EasyClaw has 0 monthly visits, while Boxes.dev has 0 monthly visits. So more people choose Boxes.dev. So the odds are that people will recommend Boxes.dev more on social platforms.
EasyClaw has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00, while Boxes.dev has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00. Also, EasyClaw has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%. Boxes.dev has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
