Fathom VS Daisy
Compare Fathom VS Daisy, what is the difference between Fathom and Daisy?
You may like
Summarize
Fathom summarize
Fathom records, transcribes, and summarizes your Zoom calls, so you can focus on the conversation at hand. Easily share call highlights with your team via email and Slack. Automate post-call data entry into your CRM, Google Docs, or Notion.
Fathom Landing Page
Daisy summarize
Local-first meeting recorder for Mac — and fully open source (Apache 2.0). Records both sides of a call (mic + system audio) with no bot joining, transcribes on-device with Whisper, and summarises with your AI (Anthropic, OpenAI, Apple Intelligence). Exposes a local MCP server so Claude & Cursor can query your meetings — and doubles as push-to-talk dictation in any app. No cloud, no account, no subscription.
Daisy Landing Page
Compare Details
Fathom details
| Categories | AI Note Taker, AI Meeting Assistant, AI Summarizer, AI Transcriber, AI Recording, AI Notes Generator, AI Assistant |
| Fathom Website | https://fathom.video?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | May 27 2023 |
| Fathom Pricing | -- |
Daisy details
| Categories | AI Note Taker, AI Meeting Assistant, AI Transcription |
| Daisy Website | https://www.mydaisy.io?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | June 17 2026 |
| Daisy Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Fathom?
Fathom integrates with Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Once connected, it automatically joins your meetings, records the audio and video, transcribes the conversation in real-time, and generates a summary after the meeting ends. Users can highlight key moments during the call and share clips with others.
How to use Daisy?
Download and install the DMG for Apple Silicon Mac (macOS 14+). Grant Screen Recording permission to capture system audio. Use the widget on your screen to start recording meetings, dictating text, or capturing voice notes. Transcripts are saved locally as Markdown files. Optionally, add your OpenAI or Anthropic API key in Settings for summaries, or toggle the local MCP server in the Connections tab to let Claude Desktop or Cursor query your meeting logs.
Compare Pros between Fathom and Daisy
Core features of Fathom
- AI-powered meeting recording, transcription, and summarization
- Integration with Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams
- Automated CRM data entry
- Shareable call highlights and clips
Core features of Daisy
- Local-first, private meeting recording (mic + system audio) with no bot joining
- On-device WhisperKit transcription powered by the Mac Neural Engine
- Offline FluidAudio diarization for accurate speaker labeling
- Local MCP server allowing Claude Desktop and Cursor to query transcripts
- Plain Markdown file export to any local folder (e.g., Obsidian vault, iCloud Drive)
- Three usage modes: Meeting capture, voice notes, and push-to-talk dictation
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Fathom
- Sales teams using Fathom to streamline follow-ups and close more deals
- Customer success teams using Fathom to improve customer interactions and save time on note-taking
- Founders using Fathom to focus on conversations and streamline follow-ups
- Marketing teams using Fathom to capture key points and share insights instantly
Use cases for Daisy
- Record and transcribe Zoom, Google Meet, or Slack calls entirely offline for maximum privacy
- Query meeting history and action items from Claude Desktop using local MCP tools
- Dictate text directly into any Mac application using push-to-talk dictation
Different Plan between Fathom and Daisy
Fathom
Free
Unlimited recording, transcription, and summarization
$15/month per user (annual billing)
Includes advanced AI features like AI-generated action items and 14 different meeting summary templates.
$19/month per user (annual billing)
Designed to provide additional features for teams and managers that use Fathom.
$29/month per user (annual billing)
Includes Single Sign-on Integration, Custom Data Retention Policies, and Advanced Security Controls
Daisy
Free
Free to use during the beta phase
One-time payment
Lifetime access after the official launch with no monthly subscription
Fathom's traffic
Fathom is the one with 5.4M monthly visits and 00:03:01 Avg.visit duration. Fathom has a Page per visit of 3.15 and a bounce rate of 41.71%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 5.4M |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:03:01 |
| Page per Visit | 3.15 |
| Bounce Rate | 41.71% |
Daisy's traffic
Daisy is the one with 0 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. Daisy has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 0 |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
| Page per Visit | 0.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Fathom are:United States 40.88%, United Kingdom 9.67%, India 5.25%, Canada 4.21%, Australia 3.90%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 40.88% |
 | 9.67% |
 | 5.25% |
 | 4.21% |
 | 3.90% |
Geography
Sorry, there are no data
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Fathom are:Direct 73.11%, Referrals 11.64%, Mail 6.26%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 5.03%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 2.89%, vs_sourcesGenAi 0.80%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.11%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.10%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.06%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.01%
Direct | 73.11% |
Referrals | 11.64% |
Mail | 6.26% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 5.03% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 2.89% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0.80% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.11% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.10% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.06% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.01% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Daisy are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Which is better: Fathom or Daisy?
Fathom might be a bit more popular than Daisy.As you can see, Fathom has 5.4M monthly visits, while Daisy has 0 monthly visits. So more people choose Fathom. So the odds are that people will recommend Fathom more on social platforms.
Fathom has an Avg.visit duration of 00:03:01, while Daisy has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00. Also, Fathom has a page per visit of 3.15 and a Bounce Rate of 41.71%. Daisy has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%.
The main users of Fathom are United States, United Kingdom, India, Canada, Australia, with the following distribution: 40.88%, 9.67%, 5.25%, 4.21%, 3.90%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
