Fluidstack VS Agenta
Compare Fluidstack VS Agenta, what is the difference between Fluidstack and Agenta?
You may like
Summarize
Fluidstack summarize
Fluidstack Landing Page
Agenta summarize
Agenta is an open-source LLMOps platform for building reliable AI apps. Manage prompts, run evaluations, and debug traces. We help developers and domain experts collaborate to ship LLM applications faster and with confidence.
Agenta Landing Page
Compare Details
Fluidstack details
| Categories | AI Developer Tools, AI Models, Large Language Models (LLMs) |
| Fluidstack Website | https://fluidstack.io?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | December 25 2023 |
| Fluidstack Pricing | -- |
Agenta details
| Categories | AI Developer Tools, Prompt Engineering, Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Agent, AI Monitor |
| Agenta Website | https://www.agenta.ai?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | December 02 2025 |
| Agenta Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Fluidstack?
To use Fluidstack, you can either reserve a large-scale GPU cluster for AI training and inference or launch on-demand GPU instances. The platform offers fully managed Kubernetes or Slurm environments, and you can contact their engineers for support.
How to use Agenta?
Users can utilize Agenta to centralize their prompts, run experiments in a unified playground, compare different prompts and models side-by-side, and track changes with complete version history. The platform supports automated and human evaluations to validate changes and provides tools for tracing every request, debugging failure points, and monitoring production performance. It also enables collaboration by allowing product managers and domain experts to edit prompts and run evaluations directly from the UI.
Compare Pros between Fluidstack and Agenta
Core features of Fluidstack
- Access to thousands of NVIDIA GPUs (H100, A100, H200, GB200)
- Fully managed infrastructure with Slurm and Kubernetes
- Large scale GPU clusters for training and inference
- On-demand GPU instances
- 24/7 support with 15-minute response times
- 99% uptime guarantee
Core features of Agenta
- Prompt Management (Engineering, Versioning, Unified Playground)
- LLM Evaluation (Automated, Human, Full Trace, Integrations)
- Observability (Tracing, Debugging, Monitoring, Feedback Loop)
- Collaboration Tools (UI for experts, Evals for PMs, API/UI parity)
- Open-source and Model Agnostic
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Fluidstack
- Training large AI models
- Running inference at scale
- Deploying and managing GPU clusters
- Accelerating machine learning product development
Use cases for Agenta
- Building and iterating on reliable LLM applications collaboratively.
- Systematically evaluating LLM performance and validating changes with evidence.
- Debugging complex AI systems by tracing requests and pinpointing errors.
- Centralizing prompt management and version control across teams.
- Empowering non-technical domain experts to contribute to prompt engineering and evaluation.
Different Plan between Fluidstack and Agenta
Fluidstack
Sorry, there are no data
Agenta
Free /month
2 users and 5k traces per month included. Unlimited prompts, 2 seats included, 20 evaluations / month included, 5k traces / month included, 30 days retention period, Community support via Github.
$49 /month
3 users and 10k traces per month included, pay as you go thereafter. Up to 10 seats, Unlimited evaluations, 10k traces / month included then $5 for every 10k, In-app support, 90 days retention period.
$399 /month
Unlimited seats and 1M traces included per month. Everything from Pro, Role-based Access Control, SOC2 reports, Private Slack Channel, 365 days retention period, SSO and MFA (soon), Business SLA.
Custom
Personalised service and enterprise security for large teams. Everything from Business, Volume pricing, Audit logs, Custom retention periods, Bring Your Own Cloud, Dedicated Support, Self-hosted deployment options, Security reviews, Custom SLA, Custom terms & DPA.
Fluidstack's traffic
Fluidstack is the one with 91.5K monthly visits and 00:01:43 Avg.visit duration. Fluidstack has a Page per visit of 2.80 and a bounce rate of 38.29%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 91.5K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:01:43 |
| Page per Visit | 2.80 |
| Bounce Rate | 38.29% |
Agenta's traffic
Agenta is the one with 34.4K monthly visits and 00:00:24 Avg.visit duration. Agenta has a Page per visit of 2.43 and a bounce rate of 39.39%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 34.4K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:24 |
| Page per Visit | 2.43 |
| Bounce Rate | 39.39% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Fluidstack are:United States 85.94%, United Kingdom 5.40%, India 1.75%, Canada 1.34%, Spain 1.33%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 85.94% |
 | 5.40% |
 | 1.75% |
 | 1.34% |
 | 1.33% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Agenta are:United States 23.35%, India 14.78%, Germany 5.64%, Vietnam 5.20%, Indonesia 5.07%
Top 5 Countries/regions
| 23.35% |
| 14.78% |
 | 5.64% |
 | 5.20% |
 | 5.07% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Fluidstack are:vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 38.56%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 31.80%, Direct 23.22%, Referrals 3.72%, Mail 1.84%, vs_sourcesGenAi 0.86%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.00%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.00%
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 38.56% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 31.80% |
Direct | 23.22% |
Referrals | 3.72% |
Mail | 1.84% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0.86% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.00% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Agenta are:Direct 35.77%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 29.30%, Referrals 24.48%, vs_sourcesGenAi 6.07%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 3.55%, Mail 0.83%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.00%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.00%
Direct | 35.77% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 29.30% |
Referrals | 24.48% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 6.07% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 3.55% |
Mail | 0.83% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.00% |
Which is better: Fluidstack or Agenta?
Fluidstack might be a bit more popular than Agenta.As you can see, Fluidstack has 91.5K monthly visits, while Agenta has 34.4K monthly visits. So more people choose Fluidstack. So the odds are that people will recommend Fluidstack more on social platforms.
Fluidstack has an Avg.visit duration of 00:01:43, while Agenta has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:24. Also, Fluidstack has a page per visit of 2.80 and a Bounce Rate of 38.29%. Agenta has a page per visit of 2.43 and a Bounce Rate of 39.39%.
The main users of Fluidstack are United States, United Kingdom, India, Canada, Spain, with the following distribution: 85.94%, 5.40%, 1.75%, 1.34%, 1.33%.
The main users of Agenta are United States, India, Germany, Vietnam, Indonesia, with the following distribution: 23.35%, 14.78%, 5.64%, 5.20%, 5.07%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
