Groq VS Chutes
Compare Groq VS Chutes, what is the difference between Groq and Chutes?
You may like
Summarize
Groq summarize
Groq Landing Page
Chutes summarize
Chutes Landing Page
Compare Details
Groq details
| Categories | AI API, Large Language Models (LLMs), Open Source AI Models |
| Groq Website | https://groq.com?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | February 21 2024 |
| Groq Pricing | -- |
Chutes details
| Categories | AI API, Open Source AI Models, Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Developer Tools, AI Models |
| Chutes Website | https://chutes.ai?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | July 15 2026 |
| Chutes Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Groq?
Developers can use Groq by accessing the GroqCloud™ platform or GroqRack™ Cluster. They can move seamlessly from other providers like OpenAI by changing three lines of code, setting the OPENAI_API_KEY to their Groq API Key, setting the base URL, and choosing their model.
How to use Chutes?
Create an account, pick a model from the catalog or use the API, and send requests with your CHUTES_API_KEY. For private workloads, build your container with the Chutes CLI, define the GPU requirements, and deploy the chute as a confidential instance.
Compare Pros between Groq and Chutes
Core features of Groq
- Fast AI inference
- LPU™ Inference Engine
- Cloud and on-prem solutions
- OpenAI endpoint compatibility
Core features of Chutes
- Serverless AI inference for open-source models
- API and web-platform access for fast deployment
- Private confidential TEE GPU deployments
- Supports image, video, speech, music, embeddings, and moderation
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Groq
- Running openly-available AI models like Llama, DeepSeek, Mixtral, Qwen, and Whisper with instant speed.
Use cases for Chutes
- Deploy open-source LLMs in production without cold starts
- Run image, video, speech, or music generation workloads
- Build AI agents and coding assistants with large-context models
- Launch private custom models or fine-tunes on dedicated GPUs
- Use embeddings or moderation models in an application
Different Plan between Groq and Chutes
Groq
Sorry, there are no data
Chutes
Varies by model
Public inference billed per 1M tokens with no subscription or minimum. Example rates include Mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 at $0.0245 in / $0.0978 out per 1M tokens and Qwen3-32B at $0.104 in / $0.416 out per 1M tokens.
$10 per month
Bundled daily quota with 6% off PAYG pricing beyond the quota.
$20 per month
Bundled daily quota with 10% off PAYG pricing beyond the quota.
From $1.80 per hour
Self-serve confidential GPU deployment with a one-time deployment fee starting at $5.40, equal to 3x the hourly rate.
Contact sales
Custom billing only, with volume discounts, custom rate limits, and dedicated support.
Groq's traffic
Groq is the one with 4.8M monthly visits and 00:03:48 Avg.visit duration. Groq has a Page per visit of 6.11 and a bounce rate of 31.76%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 4.8M |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:03:48 |
| Page per Visit | 6.11 |
| Bounce Rate | 31.76% |
Chutes's traffic
Chutes is the one with 406.2K monthly visits and 00:02:33 Avg.visit duration. Chutes has a Page per visit of 3.11 and a bounce rate of 39.41%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 406.2K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:02:33 |
| Page per Visit | 3.11 |
| Bounce Rate | 39.41% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Groq are:United States 18.93%, India 16.55%, Brazil 5.81%, Turkey 3.59%, Pakistan 3.46%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 18.93% |
 | 16.55% |
 | 5.81% |
 | 3.59% |
 | 3.46% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Chutes are:United States 32.44%, Saudi Arabia 11.89%, Russia 8.23%, India 5.27%, Brazil 4.46%
Top 5 Countries/regions
| 32.44% |
 | 11.89% |
 | 8.23% |
| 5.27% |
| 4.46% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Groq are:Direct 40.38%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 36.98%, Referrals 10.59%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 6.99%, vs_sourcesGenAi 3.66%, Mail 1.02%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.18%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.15%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.04%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%
Direct | 40.38% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 36.98% |
Referrals | 10.59% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 6.99% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 3.66% |
Mail | 1.02% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.18% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.15% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.04% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Chutes are:Direct 64.97%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 12.71%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 10.23%, Referrals 9.85%, vs_sourcesGenAi 1.36%, Mail 0.58%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.26%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.03%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%
Direct | 64.97% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 12.71% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 10.23% |
Referrals | 9.85% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 1.36% |
Mail | 0.58% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.26% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.03% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
Which is better: Groq or Chutes?
Groq might be a bit more popular than Chutes.As you can see, Groq has 4.8M monthly visits, while Chutes has 406.2K monthly visits. So more people choose Groq. So the odds are that people will recommend Groq more on social platforms.
Groq has an Avg.visit duration of 00:03:48, while Chutes has an Avg.visit duration of 00:02:33. Also, Groq has a page per visit of 6.11 and a Bounce Rate of 31.76%. Chutes has a page per visit of 3.11 and a Bounce Rate of 39.41%.
The main users of Groq are United States, India, Brazil, Turkey, Pakistan, with the following distribution: 18.93%, 16.55%, 5.81%, 3.59%, 3.46%.
The main users of Chutes are United States, Saudi Arabia, Russia, India, Brazil, with the following distribution: 32.44%, 11.89%, 8.23%, 5.27%, 4.46%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
