Kimi VS Goldfish
Compare Kimi VS Goldfish, what is the difference between Kimi and Goldfish?
You may like
Summarize
Kimi summarize
Kimi Landing Page
Goldfish summarize
Most AI tools make you explain the context before they can help. Goldfish already has it. It privately remembers what you’ve been working on across your Mac, then helps you write better from any app. Press Option in a text field to draft replies, summarize threads, rewrite sentences, or recall important details from your recent work without copying, pasting, or re-explaining the whole backstory.
Goldfish Landing Page
Compare Details
Kimi details
| Categories | AI Assistant, AI Chatbot, Large Language Models (LLMs) |
| Kimi Website | https://kimi.moonshot.cn?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | March 20 2024 |
| Kimi Pricing | -- |
Goldfish details
| Categories | AI Assistant, AI Writing Assistants, AI Productivity Tools, AI Copywriting |
| Goldfish Website | https://goldfish.sh?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | June 30 2026 |
| Goldfish Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Kimi?
Ask Kimi any question to solve your problems. You can start a new conversation by clicking '新建会话 Ctrl K'.
How to use Goldfish?
Download and install Goldfish for macOS. Once running, simply press the Option key (⌥) anywhere you type in any text field to draft replies, summarize threads, rewrite sentences, or recall important details from your recent work.
Compare Pros between Kimi and Goldfish
Core features of Kimi
- AI-powered reasoning and analysis
- Deep thinking capabilities
- Contextual understanding
- Long context window
- Multi-language translation
- Code debugging
- Content creation
Core features of Goldfish
- Contextual AI memory that privately tracks your work across your Mac
- Global shortcut integration by pressing Option (⌥) in any text field
- Writes, replies, summarizes, and rewrites in your specific tone
- Works across any application without copying or pasting
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Kimi
- Interpreting research papers
- Writing and debugging code
- Planning projects
- Creating novels
- Multi-language translation
Use cases for Goldfish
- Drafting instant replies to messages with full context
- Summarizing long text threads directly where you type
- Recalling important details from recent work to continue writing
Different Plan between Kimi and Goldfish
Kimi
Sorry, there are no data
Goldfish
Free
Free during alpha testing period
Kimi's traffic
Kimi is the one with 116.5K monthly visits and 00:01:22 Avg.visit duration. Kimi has a Page per visit of 1.39 and a bounce rate of 74.82%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 116.5K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:01:22 |
| Page per Visit | 1.39 |
| Bounce Rate | 74.82% |
Goldfish's traffic
Goldfish is the one with 6.9K monthly visits and 00:00:06 Avg.visit duration. Goldfish has a Page per visit of 1.44 and a bounce rate of 41.74%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 6.9K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:06 |
| Page per Visit | 1.44 |
| Bounce Rate | 41.74% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Kimi are:China 72.73%, United States 6.85%, Hong Kong, China 3.25%, Brazil 1.84%, United Kingdom 1.25%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 72.73% |
 | 6.85% |
 | 3.25% |
 | 1.84% |
 | 1.25% |
Geography
The top 4 countries/regions for Goldfish are:India 38.74%, United Kingdom 36.43%, Sweden 14.28%, South Africa 10.55%
Top 4 Countries/regions
 | 38.74% |
| 36.43% |
 | 14.28% |
 | 10.55% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Kimi are:Direct 42.20%, Referrals 23.48%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 21.61%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 7.24%, vs_sourcesGenAi 3.09%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 1.21%, Mail 0.99%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.18%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%
Direct | 42.20% |
Referrals | 23.48% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 21.61% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 7.24% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 3.09% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 1.21% |
Mail | 0.99% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.18% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Goldfish are:Direct 47.73%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 43.35%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 6.29%, Mail 2.63%, vs_sourcesGenAi 0.00%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, Referrals 0.00%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.00%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.00%
Direct | 47.73% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 43.35% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 6.29% |
Mail | 2.63% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
Referrals | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.00% |
Which is better: Kimi or Goldfish?
Kimi might be a bit more popular than Goldfish.As you can see, Kimi has 116.5K monthly visits, while Goldfish has 6.9K monthly visits. So more people choose Kimi. So the odds are that people will recommend Kimi more on social platforms.
Kimi has an Avg.visit duration of 00:01:22, while Goldfish has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:06. Also, Kimi has a page per visit of 1.39 and a Bounce Rate of 74.82%. Goldfish has a page per visit of 1.44 and a Bounce Rate of 41.74%.
The main users of Kimi are China, United States, Hong Kong, China, Brazil, United Kingdom, with the following distribution: 72.73%, 6.85%, 3.25%, 1.84%, 1.25%.
The main users of Goldfish are India, United Kingdom, Sweden, South Africa, with the following distribution: 38.74%, 36.43%, 14.28%, 10.55%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
