Poolside VS Spanly
Compare Poolside VS Spanly, what is the difference between Poolside and Spanly?
You may like
Summarize
Poolside summarize
Poolside is a foundation model company bringing intelligence to everywhere work gets done. Their mission is to drive abundance for humanity by creating artificial general intelligence.
Poolside Landing Page
Spanly summarize
Soon, more agents than humans will use your product via MCP. Spanly gives you full observability on the MCP server you ship: error rates, session traces, latency, client analytics, deploy alerts. Drop-in CLI or SDK. US & EU data residency. Built for SaaS engineering teams shipping MCP in production, alongside the Datadog, Sentry, or New Relic you already run.
Spanly Landing Page
Compare Details
Poolside details
| Categories | Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Agent, AI Developer Tools |
| Poolside Website | https://poolside.ai?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | June 30 2026 |
| Poolside Pricing | -- |
Spanly details
| Categories | Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Monitor, AI Developer Tools |
| Spanly Website | https://www.spanly.com?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | June 30 2026 |
| Spanly Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Poolside?
To use Poolside, organizations must contact their team to set up a custom deployment. The Poolside stack can then be deployed within the client's own secure infrastructure (on-prem, VPC, or workstations). Developers can then utilize Poolside's models, multi-agent systems, and developer surfaces such as IDE extensions, TUIs, and command-line binaries to build agentic workflows.
How to use Spanly?
To use Spanly, you can integrate it into your MCP server by dropping the open-source SDK into your TypeScript or Python code, wrapping your server binary using the Spanly CLI, or deploying it as a Docker sidecar. Once configured with your API key, it automatically captures and traces all MCP-shaped traffic, allowing you to view analytics, errors, and session traces directly via the web dashboard or from your IDE using Spanly's built-in MCP server.
Compare Pros between Poolside and Spanly
Core features of Poolside
- Foundation models built specifically for long-horizon work and software agents
- Single and multi-agent systems capable of planning, tool-use, and sandboxed execution
- Flexible deployment entirely inside your security boundary (on-prem, VPC, or workstations)
- Comprehensive developer surfaces including agents, TUIs, IDE extensions, and binaries
- Secure data and knowledge connectors to private repositories, databases, and corpora
- Executive-grade governance with role-based access control and detailed auditability
Core features of Spanly
- Protocol-aware tracing capturing full JSON-RPC payloads (arguments, results, errors)
- Real-time session tracking grouping requests end-to-end
- Comprehensive performance metrics broken down by p50, p95, and p99 durations
- Automated error tracking and grouping across servers and clients
- US & EU regional data residency options with GDPR-friendly architecture
- IDE integration allowing engineers to search traces and triage errors from tools like Claude Code or Cursor
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Poolside
- Building and orchestrating software agents to automate complex development workflows
- Deploying secure, private foundation models in highly regulated sectors like Financial Services, Defense, and Industrial
- Enabling multi-agent planning and execution inside air-gapped networks without data leaving customer control
Use cases for Spanly
- Monitoring production MCP server error rates and performance bottlenecks
- Debugging failing tool calls by inspecting full payload arguments and response details directly
- Tracking down bad deployments by splitting performance metrics out by server and client versions
- Correlating AI agent interactions and sessions across complex multi-turn tool calling workflows
Different Plan between Poolside and Spanly
Poolside
Sorry, there are no data
Spanly
$0/mo
100,000 MCP requests included (soft cap with sampling). Includes 30 days data retention, 2 seats, and multi-region ingestion. Designed for teams evaluating Spanly on a single server.
$41/mo
Billed annually at $492. Includes 100,000 MCP requests (overage from $6.00/100k decreasing with volume), 90 days data retention, unlimited seats, up to 10 alert rules, and public dashboards.
$210/mo
Billed annually at $2,520. Includes 100,000 MCP requests (overage from $6.00/100k decreasing with volume), 12 months data retention, unlimited seats, up to 100 alert rules, public dashboards, SAML & OIDC single sign-on, audit logs, and priority support.
$125/mo
Locked for 12 months for the 2026 cohort. Includes 1,000,000 requests, all Business features, a direct Slack Connect channel with the founder, roadmap input, and early access to new features in exchange for a monthly feedback call.
Custom Pricing
For volumes above 30M requests/month. Offers a custom per-request rate below $5.00/100k, dedicated support, and custom retention configurations.
Poolside's traffic
Poolside is the one with 99.0K monthly visits and 00:00:50 Avg.visit duration. Poolside has a Page per visit of 3.21 and a bounce rate of 38.37%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 99.0K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:50 |
| Page per Visit | 3.21 |
| Bounce Rate | 38.37% |
Spanly's traffic
Spanly is the one with 0 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. Spanly has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 0 |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
| Page per Visit | 0.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Poolside are:United States 27.15%, Germany 9.01%, India 7.98%, France 7.39%, Canada 5.13%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 27.15% |
 | 9.01% |
 | 7.98% |
 | 7.39% |
 | 5.13% |
Geography
Sorry, there are no data
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Poolside are:Direct 41.68%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 36.50%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 10.15%, Referrals 9.95%, vs_sourcesGenAi 1.08%, Mail 0.64%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.00%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.00%
Direct | 41.68% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 36.50% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 10.15% |
Referrals | 9.95% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 1.08% |
Mail | 0.64% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.00% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Spanly are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Which is better: Poolside or Spanly?
Poolside might be a bit more popular than Spanly.As you can see, Poolside has 99.0K monthly visits, while Spanly has 0 monthly visits. So more people choose Poolside. So the odds are that people will recommend Poolside more on social platforms.
Poolside has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:50, while Spanly has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00. Also, Poolside has a page per visit of 3.21 and a Bounce Rate of 38.37%. Spanly has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%.
The main users of Poolside are United States, Germany, India, France, Canada, with the following distribution: 27.15%, 9.01%, 7.98%, 7.39%, 5.13%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
