Noteey VS Daisy
Compare Noteey VS Daisy, what is the difference between Noteey and Daisy?
You may like
Summarize
Noteey summarize
Noteey Landing Page
Daisy summarize
Local-first meeting recorder for Mac — and fully open source (Apache 2.0). Records both sides of a call (mic + system audio) with no bot joining, transcribes on-device with Whisper, and summarises with your AI (Anthropic, OpenAI, Apple Intelligence). Exposes a local MCP server so Claude & Cursor can query your meetings — and doubles as push-to-talk dictation in any app. No cloud, no account, no subscription.
Daisy Landing Page
Compare Details
Noteey details
| Categories | AI Note Taker, AI Summarizer, AI Knowledge Management, AI Transcription |
| Noteey Website | https://www.noteey.com?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | April 23 2025 |
| Noteey Pricing | -- |
Daisy details
| Categories | AI Note Taker, AI Meeting Assistant, AI Transcription |
| Daisy Website | https://www.mydaisy.io?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | June 17 2026 |
| Daisy Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Noteey?
Users can download the Noteey app and start creating visual notes on an infinite canvas. They can add various content types, highlight documents and videos, take time-stamped notes, and structure their ideas visually. The app supports offline access and local backups for secure and fast note-taking.
How to use Daisy?
Download and install the DMG for Apple Silicon Mac (macOS 14+). Grant Screen Recording permission to capture system audio. Use the widget on your screen to start recording meetings, dictating text, or capturing voice notes. Transcripts are saved locally as Markdown files. Optionally, add your OpenAI or Anthropic API key in Settings for summaries, or toggle the local MCP server in the Connections tab to let Claude Desktop or Cursor query your meeting logs.
Compare Pros between Noteey and Daisy
Core features of Noteey
- Visual note-taking on an infinite canvas
- Offline access and local backup
- PDF annotations and deep linking
- Video note-taking with timestamps
- Drawing tools and presentation mode
Core features of Daisy
- Local-first, private meeting recording (mic + system audio) with no bot joining
- On-device WhisperKit transcription powered by the Mac Neural Engine
- Offline FluidAudio diarization for accurate speaker labeling
- Local MCP server allowing Claude Desktop and Cursor to query transcripts
- Plain Markdown file export to any local folder (e.g., Obsidian vault, iCloud Drive)
- Three usage modes: Meeting capture, voice notes, and push-to-talk dictation
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Noteey
- Research
- Second Brain
- Creative Writing
- Swipe Files
- Mood Board
- Flowchart
- Video highlight
- PDF annotation
Use cases for Daisy
- Record and transcribe Zoom, Google Meet, or Slack calls entirely offline for maximum privacy
- Query meeting history and action items from Claude Desktop using local MCP tools
- Dictate text directly into any Mac application using push-to-talk dictation
Different Plan between Noteey and Daisy
Noteey
Sorry, there are no data
Daisy
Free
Free to use during the beta phase
One-time payment
Lifetime access after the official launch with no monthly subscription
Noteey's traffic
Noteey is the one with 205.7K monthly visits and 00:00:21 Avg.visit duration. Noteey has a Page per visit of 1.73 and a bounce rate of 44.74%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 205.7K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:21 |
| Page per Visit | 1.73 |
| Bounce Rate | 44.74% |
Daisy's traffic
Daisy is the one with 0 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. Daisy has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 0 |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
| Page per Visit | 0.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Noteey are:South Korea 21.38%, United States 11.86%, India 5.98%, Belgium 3.22%, United Kingdom 2.85%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 21.38% |
 | 11.86% |
 | 5.98% |
 | 3.22% |
 | 2.85% |
Geography
Sorry, there are no data
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Noteey are:vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 79.05%, Direct 12.62%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 4.30%, Referrals 2.97%, vs_sourcesGenAi 1.06%, Mail 0.00%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.00%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.00%
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 79.05% |
Direct | 12.62% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 4.30% |
Referrals | 2.97% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 1.06% |
Mail | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.00% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Daisy are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Which is better: Noteey or Daisy?
Noteey might be a bit more popular than Daisy.As you can see, Noteey has 205.7K monthly visits, while Daisy has 0 monthly visits. So more people choose Noteey. So the odds are that people will recommend Noteey more on social platforms.
Noteey has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:21, while Daisy has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00. Also, Noteey has a page per visit of 1.73 and a Bounce Rate of 44.74%. Daisy has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%.
The main users of Noteey are South Korea, United States, India, Belgium, United Kingdom, with the following distribution: 21.38%, 11.86%, 5.98%, 3.22%, 2.85%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
