OpenLIT VS Spanly
Compare OpenLIT VS Spanly, what is the difference between OpenLIT and Spanly?
You may like
Summarize
OpenLIT summarize
OpenLIT is an open-source GenAI and LLM observability platform native to OpenTelemetry with traces and metrics in a single application 🔥 🖥 Open source GenAI and LLM Application Performance Monitoring (APM) & Observability tool
OpenLIT Landing Page
Spanly summarize
Soon, more agents than humans will use your product via MCP. Spanly gives you full observability on the MCP server you ship: error rates, session traces, latency, client analytics, deploy alerts. Drop-in CLI or SDK. US & EU data residency. Built for SaaS engineering teams shipping MCP in production, alongside the Datadog, Sentry, or New Relic you already run.
Spanly Landing Page
Compare Details
OpenLIT details
| Categories | Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Developer Tools, AI Monitor, Open Source AI Models |
| OpenLIT Website | https://openlit.io?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | July 11 2024 |
| OpenLIT Pricing | -- |
Spanly details
| Categories | Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Monitor, AI Developer Tools |
| Spanly Website | https://www.spanly.com?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | June 30 2026 |
| Spanly Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use OpenLIT?
Integrate OpenLIT into your LLM application by adding `openlit.init()` to start collecting data. You can also run `docker-compose up -d` to quickly start using the open-source tool.
How to use Spanly?
To use Spanly, you can integrate it into your MCP server by dropping the open-source SDK into your TypeScript or Python code, wrapping your server binary using the Spanly CLI, or deploying it as a Docker sidecar. Once configured with your API key, it automatically captures and traces all MCP-shaped traffic, allowing you to view analytics, errors, and session traces directly via the web dashboard or from your IDE using Spanly's built-in MCP server.
Compare Pros between OpenLIT and Spanly
Core features of OpenLIT
- Application and Request Tracing
- Detailed Span Tracking
- Cost Tracking
- Exceptions Monitoring
- Centralized Prompt Repository
- Secure Secrets Management (Vault Hub)
- OpenTelemetry Native Integration
- Granular Usage Insights
- Real-Time Data Streaming
- Low Latency
Core features of Spanly
- Protocol-aware tracing capturing full JSON-RPC payloads (arguments, results, errors)
- Real-time session tracking grouping requests end-to-end
- Comprehensive performance metrics broken down by p50, p95, and p99 durations
- Automated error tracking and grouping across servers and clients
- US & EU regional data residency options with GDPR-friendly architecture
- IDE integration allowing engineers to search traces and triage errors from tools like Claude Code or Cursor
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for OpenLIT
- Visualize traces for application and request tracing to improve performance visibility.
- Monitor exceptions and troubleshoot issues with detailed stacktraces.
- Test and compare different LLMs side-by-side based on performance and cost.
- Manage prompts with versioning and variable substitution.
- Securely store and manage sensitive application secrets.
Use cases for Spanly
- Monitoring production MCP server error rates and performance bottlenecks
- Debugging failing tool calls by inspecting full payload arguments and response details directly
- Tracking down bad deployments by splitting performance metrics out by server and client versions
- Correlating AI agent interactions and sessions across complex multi-turn tool calling workflows
Different Plan between OpenLIT and Spanly
OpenLIT
Sorry, there are no data
Spanly
$0/mo
100,000 MCP requests included (soft cap with sampling). Includes 30 days data retention, 2 seats, and multi-region ingestion. Designed for teams evaluating Spanly on a single server.
$41/mo
Billed annually at $492. Includes 100,000 MCP requests (overage from $6.00/100k decreasing with volume), 90 days data retention, unlimited seats, up to 10 alert rules, and public dashboards.
$210/mo
Billed annually at $2,520. Includes 100,000 MCP requests (overage from $6.00/100k decreasing with volume), 12 months data retention, unlimited seats, up to 100 alert rules, public dashboards, SAML & OIDC single sign-on, audit logs, and priority support.
$125/mo
Locked for 12 months for the 2026 cohort. Includes 1,000,000 requests, all Business features, a direct Slack Connect channel with the founder, roadmap input, and early access to new features in exchange for a monthly feedback call.
Custom Pricing
For volumes above 30M requests/month. Offers a custom per-request rate below $5.00/100k, dedicated support, and custom retention configurations.
OpenLIT's traffic
OpenLIT is the one with 9.1K monthly visits and 00:00:12 Avg.visit duration. OpenLIT has a Page per visit of 1.74 and a bounce rate of 38.40%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 9.1K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:12 |
| Page per Visit | 1.74 |
| Bounce Rate | 38.40% |
Spanly's traffic
Spanly is the one with 0 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. Spanly has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 0 |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
| Page per Visit | 0.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for OpenLIT are:United States 34.02%, Russia 23.20%, India 13.97%, Poland 10.50%, Germany 6.78%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 34.02% |
 | 23.20% |
 | 13.97% |
 | 10.50% |
 | 6.78% |
Geography
Sorry, there are no data
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to OpenLIT are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Spanly are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Which is better: OpenLIT or Spanly?
OpenLIT might be a bit more popular than Spanly.As you can see, OpenLIT has 9.1K monthly visits, while Spanly has 0 monthly visits. So more people choose OpenLIT. So the odds are that people will recommend OpenLIT more on social platforms.
OpenLIT has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:12, while Spanly has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00. Also, OpenLIT has a page per visit of 1.74 and a Bounce Rate of 38.40%. Spanly has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%.
The main users of OpenLIT are United States, Russia, India, Poland, Germany, with the following distribution: 34.02%, 23.20%, 13.97%, 10.50%, 6.78%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
