Propolis VS ProjectDiscovery Neo
Compare Propolis VS ProjectDiscovery Neo, what is the difference between Propolis and ProjectDiscovery Neo?
You may like
Summarize
Propolis summarize
Propolis unleashes AI swarms that eliminate manual QA by testing like real users. Our autonomous browser agents explore all your product flows, find bugs, and adapt instantly to changes. Ship faster with confidence.
Propolis Landing Page
ProjectDiscovery Neo summarize
ProjectDiscovery Neo Landing Page
Compare Details
Propolis details
| Categories | AI Testing, AI Agent, AI Browsers, AI Workflow, AI Productivity Tools, AI Developer Tools, AI Copilot |
| Propolis Website | https://propolis.tech?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | May 23 2025 |
| Propolis Pricing | -- |
ProjectDiscovery Neo details
| Categories | AI Testing, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools |
| ProjectDiscovery Neo Website | https://projectdiscovery.io?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | August 12 2026 |
| ProjectDiscovery Neo Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Propolis?
To use Propolis, you deploy swarms of autonomous browser agents that run hundreds of user-like sessions simultaneously on your product. These agents learn how to use your product through exploration, just like real users would, requiring no scripting or setup. You can run these swarms on your own cadence and conditions, such as every deploy, every merge, at random intervals, or targeted times for spot checks. After deployment, you receive immediate understanding of where and how things are breaking, with traces sent directly to your engineering team.
How to use ProjectDiscovery Neo?
Sign up for Neo, select a Pay as you go or Enterprise plan, and connect your applications, repositories, cloud environments, and exposed assets. Use credits to run workflows such as application pentesting, reconnaissance, PR security reviews, and vulnerability triage. Neo maps assets, executes security tests, reproduces findings through a separate verifier, and routes confirmed vulnerabilities to engineering teams.
Compare Pros between Propolis and ProjectDiscovery Neo
Core features of Propolis
- AI-powered autonomous browser agents
- Eliminates manual QA
- Tests like real users
- Explores all product flows
- Finds bugs and errors
- Adapts instantly to changes
- Full QA coverage
- Zero setup (no scripting required)
- Simulates real users via swarms
- Runs hundreds of user-like sessions simultaneously
- Immediate understanding of breaking points with traces
- Customizable run schedules and conditions
- Enhanced bug reporting (Pro plan)
- Enterprise-grade compliance (Enterprise plan)
Core features of ProjectDiscovery Neo
- AI-powered application and API pentesting
- Real-time attack surface mapping and exposure analysis
- Code and pull request security reviews
- Automated vulnerability triage and independent finding verification
- Red teaming and custom security automation
- Cloud, repository, Slack, GitHub, and infrastructure integrations
- Continuous testing informed by memory, previous findings, and community detection knowledge
- Coverage for new CVEs, CISA KEVs, public exploits, and emerging attack techniques
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Propolis
- Automating all QA needs for web applications
- Testing product flows to find bugs and errors before deployment
- Simulating real user interactions for comprehensive testing coverage
- Running continuous tests on every deploy or merge for faster shipping
- Reducing manual QA effort and test maintenance for engineering teams
- Ensuring better user experience by handling every possible scenario
- Gaining data-driven insights on where users struggle with the product
Use cases for ProjectDiscovery Neo
- Continuously discover and test domains, APIs, endpoints, ports, cloud services, and exposed assets
- Run full application and API penetration tests without manually coordinating multiple tools
- Review pull requests for security vulnerabilities before code reaches production
- Triage and reproduce reported vulnerabilities to reduce false positives
- Monitor large cloud environments for exploitable weaknesses and exposure
- Automate reconnaissance and red-team workflows across continuously changing infrastructure
Different Plan between Propolis and ProjectDiscovery Neo
Propolis
Sorry, there are no data
ProjectDiscovery Neo
Starts at $250 per month
Includes 50 credits per seat, with additional credits available at $5 per credit. Supports application and API pentesting, attack surface management, code and PR review, red teaming, vulnerability triage, custom automation, integrations, and other listed workflows.
Contact for pricing
Includes Pay as you go features plus volume credit discounts, BYOK, internal network auditing, SSO and SAML, dedicated VPC deployment, static egress IPs, unlimited seats, organizational spend controls, and dedicated support.
Propolis's traffic
Propolis is the one with 0 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. Propolis has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 0 |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
| Page per Visit | 0.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
ProjectDiscovery Neo's traffic
ProjectDiscovery Neo is the one with 121.6K monthly visits and 00:00:45 Avg.visit duration. ProjectDiscovery Neo has a Page per visit of 2.60 and a bounce rate of 41.97%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 121.6K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:45 |
| Page per Visit | 2.60 |
| Bounce Rate | 41.97% |
Geography
Sorry, there are no data
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for ProjectDiscovery Neo are:United States 20.84%, United Kingdom 10.62%, India 10.46%, Indonesia 6.54%, Germany 6.29%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 20.84% |
 | 10.62% |
 | 10.46% |
 | 6.54% |
 | 6.29% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Propolis are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to ProjectDiscovery Neo are:Direct 44.94%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 32.84%, Referrals 12.82%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 6.42%, vs_sourcesGenAi 1.78%, Mail 0.87%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.34%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.00%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%
Direct | 44.94% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 32.84% |
Referrals | 12.82% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 6.42% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 1.78% |
Mail | 0.87% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.34% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
Which is better: Propolis or ProjectDiscovery Neo?
ProjectDiscovery Neo might be a bit more popular than Propolis.As you can see, Propolis has 0 monthly visits, while ProjectDiscovery Neo has 121.6K monthly visits. So more people choose ProjectDiscovery Neo. So the odds are that people will recommend ProjectDiscovery Neo more on social platforms.
Propolis has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00, while ProjectDiscovery Neo has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:45. Also, Propolis has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%. ProjectDiscovery Neo has a page per visit of 2.60 and a Bounce Rate of 41.97%.
The main users of ProjectDiscovery Neo are United States, United Kingdom, India, Indonesia, Germany, with the following distribution: 20.84%, 10.62%, 10.46%, 6.54%, 6.29%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
