ProxyCC VS XCrawl
Compare ProxyCC VS XCrawl, what is the difference between ProxyCC and XCrawl?
You may like
Summarize
ProxyCC summarize
ProxyCC Landing Page
XCrawl summarize
XCrawl Landing Page
Compare Details
ProxyCC details
| Categories | AI Web Scraping, AI SEO Tools, AI Advertising |
| ProxyCC Website | https://proxy.cc/?keyword=z9mk0exv&utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | December 19 2025 |
| ProxyCC Pricing | -- |
XCrawl details
| Categories | AI Web Scraping, AI API, AI Developer Tools, AI Data Mining, AI Agent, AI SEO Tools |
| XCrawl Website | https://www.xcrawl.com?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | March 26 2026 |
| XCrawl Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use ProxyCC?
The website content does not explicitly detail the step-by-step process of how to use the proxy services. Typically, users would register, select a proxy type and package, and then integrate the provided proxy IPs into their applications or browsers for their specific use cases.
How to use XCrawl?
To use XCrawl, create a free account to obtain an API key. You can then use the provided Python or Node.js SDKs, or make direct REST API calls. Simply input the target URL into the Scrape API to receive structured data, or use the Crawl API to extract data from entire domains. It also integrates directly with tools like n8n and AI agents via the MCP server.
Compare Pros between ProxyCC and XCrawl
Core features of ProxyCC
- 90,000,000+ IP resources
- Residential proxies (static, unlimited traffic)
- Static datacenter proxies
- Long-term ISP proxies
- Solutions for AI data
Core features of XCrawl
- AI-Powered Structured Extraction (JSON & Markdown)
- Built-in Global Residential Proxies with auto-rotation
- Headless Browser Rendering for JavaScript-heavy sites
- Multi-page Crawl API with depth control
- SERP API for Google and other search engine results
- Native MCP Server support for AI assistants like Claude
- 99%+ Data Extraction Success Rate with anti-bot protection
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for ProxyCC
- Market research
- Brand protection
- Search engine optimization (SEO)
- Ad verification
- Web scraping
Use cases for XCrawl
- Feeding real-time web data into LLMs and RAG pipelines
- Automated lead generation and B2B prospecting
- Real-time price monitoring and competitive intelligence
- SEO monitoring and SERP analysis
- Content aggregation and media monitoring
Different Plan between ProxyCC and XCrawl
ProxyCC
$0 / GB
Data for AI solutions
$0 / IP / day
$0 / day
Special Christmas offer
$0 / IP / day
$0 / GB
$0 / GB
XCrawl
$0.00
1,000 credits (one-time), 10 concurrent requests, community support
$8/Monthly
5,000 credits/month, 10 concurrent requests, email support
$49/Monthly
60,000 credits/month, 20 concurrent requests, standard support
$199/Monthly
350,000 credits/month, 50 concurrent requests, priority support
$499/Monthly
1,200,000 credits/month, 100 concurrent requests, priority support
$999/Monthly
3,000,000 credits/month, 200 concurrent requests, dedicated account manager
ProxyCC's traffic
ProxyCC is the one with 13.3K monthly visits and 00:00:13 Avg.visit duration. ProxyCC has a Page per visit of 3.17 and a bounce rate of 36.85%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 13.3K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:13 |
| Page per Visit | 3.17 |
| Bounce Rate | 36.85% |
XCrawl's traffic
XCrawl is the one with 41.9K monthly visits and 00:03:32 Avg.visit duration. XCrawl has a Page per visit of 3.99 and a bounce rate of 49.22%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 41.9K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:03:32 |
| Page per Visit | 3.99 |
| Bounce Rate | 49.22% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for ProxyCC are:Vietnam 19.04%, Brazil 18.76%, United States 13.40%, Indonesia 8.33%, Spain 7.59%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 19.04% |
 | 18.76% |
 | 13.40% |
 | 8.33% |
 | 7.59% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for XCrawl are:China 73.24%, United States 13.17%, Hong Kong, China 7.82%, Singapore 4.10%, Japan 1.27%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 73.24% |
| 13.17% |
 | 7.82% |
 | 4.10% |
 | 1.27% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to ProxyCC are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to XCrawl are:vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 53.87%, Direct 32.96%, Referrals 6.24%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 5.68%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.69%, Mail 0.44%, vs_sourcesGenAi 0.13%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.00%
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 53.87% |
Direct | 32.96% |
Referrals | 6.24% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 5.68% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.69% |
Mail | 0.44% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0.13% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.00% |
Which is better: ProxyCC or XCrawl?
XCrawl might be a bit more popular than ProxyCC.As you can see, ProxyCC has 13.3K monthly visits, while XCrawl has 41.9K monthly visits. So more people choose XCrawl. So the odds are that people will recommend XCrawl more on social platforms.
ProxyCC has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:13, while XCrawl has an Avg.visit duration of 00:03:32. Also, ProxyCC has a page per visit of 3.17 and a Bounce Rate of 36.85%. XCrawl has a page per visit of 3.99 and a Bounce Rate of 49.22%.
The main users of ProxyCC are Vietnam, Brazil, United States, Indonesia, Spain, with the following distribution: 19.04%, 18.76%, 13.40%, 8.33%, 7.59%.
The main users of XCrawl are China, United States, Hong Kong, China, Singapore, Japan, with the following distribution: 73.24%, 13.17%, 7.82%, 4.10%, 1.27%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
