Qase VS ProjectDiscovery Neo
Compare Qase VS ProjectDiscovery Neo, what is the difference between Qase and ProjectDiscovery Neo?
You may like
Summarize
Qase summarize
Qase Landing Page
ProjectDiscovery Neo summarize
ProjectDiscovery Neo Landing Page
Compare Details
Qase details
| Categories | AI Testing, AI Agent, AI Productivity Tools, AI Developer Tools |
| Qase Website | https://qase.io?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | April 16 2025 |
| Qase Pricing | -- |
ProjectDiscovery Neo details
| Categories | AI Testing, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools |
| ProjectDiscovery Neo Website | https://projectdiscovery.io?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | August 12 2026 |
| ProjectDiscovery Neo Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Qase?
Qase allows users to create test suites, cases, and runs, enhance data analysis with customizable dashboards, and collaborate with internal and external stakeholders with flexible role-based permissions. It integrates with 35+ tools, allowing users to combine all testing activities under a single workspace.
How to use ProjectDiscovery Neo?
Sign up for Neo, select a Pay as you go or Enterprise plan, and connect your applications, repositories, cloud environments, and exposed assets. Use credits to run workflows such as application pentesting, reconnaissance, PR security reviews, and vulnerability triage. Neo maps assets, executes security tests, reproduces findings through a separate verifier, and routes confirmed vulnerabilities to engineering teams.
Compare Pros between Qase and ProjectDiscovery Neo
Core features of Qase
- Test management for manual and automated testing
- Customizable dashboards and reporting
- Role-based access control
- Integrations with 35+ tools
- AI-powered testing with AIDEN
Core features of ProjectDiscovery Neo
- AI-powered application and API pentesting
- Real-time attack surface mapping and exposure analysis
- Code and pull request security reviews
- Automated vulnerability triage and independent finding verification
- Red teaming and custom security automation
- Cloud, repository, Slack, GitHub, and infrastructure integrations
- Continuous testing informed by memory, previous findings, and community detection knowledge
- Coverage for new CVEs, CISA KEVs, public exploits, and emerging attack techniques
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Qase
- Managing manual and automated test cases
- Generating reports on testing progress and results
- Collaborating on testing activities with team members
- Integrating testing with CI/CD pipelines
Use cases for ProjectDiscovery Neo
- Continuously discover and test domains, APIs, endpoints, ports, cloud services, and exposed assets
- Run full application and API penetration tests without manually coordinating multiple tools
- Review pull requests for security vulnerabilities before code reaches production
- Triage and reproduce reported vulnerabilities to reduce false positives
- Monitor large cloud environments for exploitable weaknesses and exposure
- Automate reconnaissance and red-team workflows across continuously changing infrastructure
Different Plan between Qase and ProjectDiscovery Neo
Qase
$0
Up to 3 users, Up to 2 projects, 500 Mb storage, 30 days of test data history, 25k test results/mo via API
$20
user/month billed annually, Up to 20 users, Unlimited test runs & projects, 100 Gb storage, 90 days of test data history, Dashboards & reporting, 35+ integrations, Custom fields, 100k test results/mo via API, Webhooks, Requirements management
$30
user/month billed annually, Everything in Startup, plus: Up to 100 users, Unlimited storage, Role-based access control, 1 year of test data history, Test case review, Qase Query Language, Requirements Traceability, Premium support
Custom
Everything in Business, plus: Single Sign-On (SAML 2.0), User provisioning (SCIM), SLA, Unlimited access to test run data, Customer success manager, Enterprise support, Dedicated cluster, Custom domain
ProjectDiscovery Neo
Starts at $250 per month
Includes 50 credits per seat, with additional credits available at $5 per credit. Supports application and API pentesting, attack surface management, code and PR review, red teaming, vulnerability triage, custom automation, integrations, and other listed workflows.
Contact for pricing
Includes Pay as you go features plus volume credit discounts, BYOK, internal network auditing, SSO and SAML, dedicated VPC deployment, static egress IPs, unlimited seats, organizational spend controls, and dedicated support.
Qase's traffic
Qase is the one with 472.8K monthly visits and 00:13:14 Avg.visit duration. Qase has a Page per visit of 14.76 and a bounce rate of 23.22%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 472.8K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:13:14 |
| Page per Visit | 14.76 |
| Bounce Rate | 23.22% |
ProjectDiscovery Neo's traffic
ProjectDiscovery Neo is the one with 153.0K monthly visits and 00:00:46 Avg.visit duration. ProjectDiscovery Neo has a Page per visit of 2.49 and a bounce rate of 40.33%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 153.0K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:46 |
| Page per Visit | 2.49 |
| Bounce Rate | 40.33% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Qase are:South Korea 14.42%, Brazil 11.72%, Jordan 11.24%, Belarus 11.19%, Russia 9.02%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 14.42% |
 | 11.72% |
 | 11.24% |
 | 11.19% |
 | 9.02% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for ProjectDiscovery Neo are:United States 16.34%, India 15.11%, Vietnam 6.80%, Brazil 5.18%, Indonesia 3.79%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 16.34% |
 | 15.11% |
 | 6.80% |
| 5.18% |
 | 3.79% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Qase are:Direct 83.29%, Referrals 5.54%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 4.73%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 3.56%, Mail 1.66%, vs_sourcesGenAi 0.64%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.34%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.24%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.00%
Direct | 83.29% |
Referrals | 5.54% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 4.73% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 3.56% |
Mail | 1.66% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0.64% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.34% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.24% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.00% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to ProjectDiscovery Neo are:Direct 52.91%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 27.49%, Referrals 9.49%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 4.85%, vs_sourcesGenAi 3.28%, Mail 1.53%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.46%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.00%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%
Direct | 52.91% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 27.49% |
Referrals | 9.49% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 4.85% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 3.28% |
Mail | 1.53% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.46% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
Which is better: Qase or ProjectDiscovery Neo?
Qase might be a bit more popular than ProjectDiscovery Neo.As you can see, Qase has 472.8K monthly visits, while ProjectDiscovery Neo has 153.0K monthly visits. So more people choose Qase. So the odds are that people will recommend Qase more on social platforms.
Qase has an Avg.visit duration of 00:13:14, while ProjectDiscovery Neo has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:46. Also, Qase has a page per visit of 14.76 and a Bounce Rate of 23.22%. ProjectDiscovery Neo has a page per visit of 2.49 and a Bounce Rate of 40.33%.
The main users of Qase are South Korea, Brazil, Jordan, Belarus, Russia, with the following distribution: 14.42%, 11.72%, 11.24%, 11.19%, 9.02%.
The main users of ProjectDiscovery Neo are United States, India, Vietnam, Brazil, Indonesia, with the following distribution: 16.34%, 15.11%, 6.80%, 5.18%, 3.79%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
