A research framework for studying emergent risks in multi-agent systems using soft probabilistic labels and governance simulations.
The fastest way to install a skill directly from the registry.
npx clawhub@latest install swarm-2
Copy the skill folder to one of these locations
~/.openclaw/skills/ <project>/skills/ Priority: Workspace > Local > Bundled
Copy this prompt to OpenClaw to install it automatically.
Help me install swarm-2 using Clawhub. If Clawhub is not installed, install it first (npm i -g clawhub).
Get the raw skill files in a ZIP archive.
SWARM (System-Wide Assessment of Risk in Multi-agent systems) is a sophisticated research framework designed to study how intelligence swarms and identify exactly where it fails. Unlike traditional binary safety classifications, this skill utilizes soft probabilistic labels to assess risks, acknowledging that harmful dynamics can emerge from the interaction of sub-AGI agents even when no individual agent is intentionally misaligned. By integrating this into Openclaw Skills, researchers can explore 38 agent types and 29 governance levers across various complex scenarios.
This tool is essential for understanding phase transitions in agent populations, such as the critical threshold where adversarial behavior leads to irreversible system collapse. It bridges multiple frameworks, including OpenClaw and Concordia, providing a unified environment for rigorous AI safety experimentation, red-teaming, and the study of the governance cost paradox.
Install the core package using pip:
pip install swarm-safety
For full LLM support and API functionality relevant to Openclaw Skills, use the following command:
pip install swarm-safety[llm,api]
To start the local research server for API-based interactions:
uvicorn swarm.api.app:app --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8000
The skill organizes research data through structured YAML scenarios and comprehensive metric exports. Metrics are categorized into five key areas:
| Metric | Description |
|---|---|
| Toxicity Rate | Expected harm among accepted interactions |
| Quality Gap | Indicator of adverse selection (negative values indicate systemic failure) |
| Conditional Loss | Selection effect on payoffs |
| Incoherence | Variance-to-error ratio across simulation replays |
| Illusion Delta | Gap between perceived coherence and actual consistency |
Scenario files define agent families (e.g., LDT, RLM, Scholar), governance levers, and specific success thresholds for toxicity and welfare.
Loading
A real-time data streaming connector that pipes MQTT, Kafka, and webhook data directly into AI agents via the Model Context Protocol.

Launch autonomous background sessions to perform deep-dive market research and technical analysis on any business idea.

A privacy-respecting metasearch skill that aggregates results from over 250 engines with support for DuckDuckGo-style bangs.

An automated business intelligence agent that aggregates corporate news, partner updates, and industry bidding opportunities into a concise morning briefing.

A sophisticated research framework for studying emergent risks and governance paradoxes in multi-agent AI systems through probabilistic assessment.

A specialized helper skill for accessing authenticated human account endpoints on the Boktoshi platform via Firebase ID tokens.








































