EasyClaw VS Rivet
Compare EasyClaw VS Rivet, what is the difference between EasyClaw and Rivet?
You may like
Summarize
EasyClaw summarize
The fastest way is using the EasyClaw desktop app. Its setup wizard will guide you through the essentials: picking an AI model provider (like Google or OpenAI) and connecting your chat apps (like WhatsApp or iMessage). Once the wizard is done, you just start the gateway from the app. Your agent comes online immediately, ready to talk in the chat apps you connected. For most users, this is all you need to do; no command-line or code is required.
EasyClaw Landing Page
Rivet summarize
Rivet Landing Page
Compare Details
EasyClaw details
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Assistant, AI Developer Tools, Open Source AI Models |
| EasyClaw Website | https://easyclaw.app?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | February 04 2026 |
| EasyClaw Pricing | -- |
Rivet details
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Workflow, AI Developer Tools, AI App Builder |
| Rivet Website | https://rivet.dev?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | September 11 2026 |
| Rivet Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use EasyClaw?
Users download the EasyClaw desktop app (available for macOS and Linux, with Windows coming soon). The embedded setup wizard guides the user through selecting an AI model provider (e.g., Google, OpenAI) and connecting their desired chat applications. Once configured, the user simply starts the gateway from the app, and the AI agent immediately becomes ready to interact via the connected chat platforms.
How to use Rivet?
Install Rivet locally with the Rivet SDK, create durable Actors and workflows, configure agentOS environments for secure execution, and connect your existing frameworks, runtimes, tools, and cloud platforms. Develop locally using the same APIs and control-plane behavior as production, then deploy to Rivet Cloud, your own infrastructure, or a fully self-hosted environment. Use the Rivet dashboard or Rivet MCP to inspect actor state, sessions, workflow runs, and application releases.
Compare Pros between EasyClaw and Rivet
Core features of EasyClaw
- One-click/paste, zero-friction installation for the OpenClaw stack.
- Bridges AI agents across major messaging platforms (WhatsApp, Signal, iMessage, Telegram, Discord, Slack).
- Runs everything locally on the user's hardware, ensuring data privacy.
- Supports multiple operating systems (macOS, Linux, Windows coming soon).
- Choice of AI provider (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, OpenRouter).
Core features of Rivet
- Durable Actors for persistent agent processes, memory, real-time communication, and streaming
- agentOS environments with secure code execution, filesystems, isolation, and session transcripts
- Restart-safe durable workflows for multi-step agent operations
- Dynamic Apps for deploying AI-generated application backends
- Managed cloud, VPC, on-premises, self-hosted, and air-gapped deployment options
- Dashboard observability for Actors, agentOS sessions, workflows, and releases
- Rivet MCP integration for AI clients such as Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor
- Postgres, FoundationDB, and S3 storage support
- Integration with React, Next.js, Svelte, Hono, Express, Node.js, Bun, Deno, AWS, Kubernetes, and other tools
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for EasyClaw
- Quickly installing the OpenClaw/ClawdBot/MoltBot AI stack without dealing with dependency errors or complex configuration.
- Setting up a local AI assistant for non-developers who are unfamiliar with the terminal.
- Running a single AI agent that can respond and manage tasks across multiple messaging services simultaneously.
- Deploying AI agents easily across community groups or small teams (e.g., Discord communities).
Use cases for Rivet
- Build AI agents with persistent state, memory, and durable execution
- Run agents in isolated environments with secure code execution and filesystem access
- Automate long-running, multi-step business processes that must survive restarts
- Deploy AI-generated application backends for end users
- Operate agent infrastructure inside a private VPC, on-premises, or an air-gapped network
- Monitor agent sessions, workflow runs, actor state, and application releases
- Create real-time and streaming applications powered by durable agents
Different Plan between EasyClaw and Rivet
EasyClaw
Sorry, there are no data
Rivet
$0 per month
For prototyping and small projects. Includes 100,000 Awake Actor Hours per month, a $5 compute limit, 1 vCPU maximum, 5GB storage, 5 million writes, 200 million reads, 100GB egress, and community support.
From $20 per month plus usage
For scaling applications. Includes 400,000 Awake Actor Hours, up to 8 vCPUs, 25 billion reads, 50 million writes, 5GB storage, 1TB egress, and email support.
From $200 per month plus usage
For growing teams and businesses. Includes 400,000 Awake Actor Hours, up to 8 vCPUs, 25 billion reads, 50 million writes, 5GB storage, 1TB egress, MFA, and Slack support.
Custom pricing
Self-hosted enterprise features including an Actor control plane, FoundationDB persistence, multi-tenant cloud layers, backups, point-in-time recovery, forking, ACLs, advanced analytics, OpenTelemetry, alerting configurations, Kubernetes manifests, air-gapped deployments, priority support, SLAs, and compliance hardening guidance.
Metered
Beyond plan allowances: $0.05 per 1,000 Awake Actor Hours, $0.40 per GB-month of state storage, $0.20 per million reads, $1 per million writes, $0.15 per GB of egress, and compute from $0.0000330 per vCPU-second plus $0.0000029 per GiB-second.
EasyClaw's traffic
EasyClaw is the one with 0 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. EasyClaw has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 0 |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
| Page per Visit | 0.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
Rivet's traffic
Rivet is the one with 33.1K monthly visits and 00:00:14 Avg.visit duration. Rivet has a Page per visit of 1.61 and a bounce rate of 42.25%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 33.1K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:14 |
| Page per Visit | 1.61 |
| Bounce Rate | 42.25% |
Geography
Sorry, there are no data
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Rivet are:United States 37.24%, India 21.98%, Brazil 11.24%, Israel 4.78%, Hong Kong, China 3.92%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 37.24% |
 | 21.98% |
 | 11.24% |
 | 4.78% |
 | 3.92% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to EasyClaw are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Rivet are:Direct 37.62%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 29.69%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 19.11%, Referrals 9.20%, Mail 1.80%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.82%, vs_sourcesGenAi 0.56%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.53%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.46%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.21%
Direct | 37.62% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 29.69% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 19.11% |
Referrals | 9.20% |
Mail | 1.80% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.82% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0.56% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.53% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.46% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.21% |
Which is better: EasyClaw or Rivet?
Rivet might be a bit more popular than EasyClaw.As you can see, EasyClaw has 0 monthly visits, while Rivet has 33.1K monthly visits. So more people choose Rivet. So the odds are that people will recommend Rivet more on social platforms.
EasyClaw has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00, while Rivet has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:14. Also, EasyClaw has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%. Rivet has a page per visit of 1.61 and a Bounce Rate of 42.25%.
The main users of Rivet are United States, India, Brazil, Israel, Hong Kong, China, with the following distribution: 37.24%, 21.98%, 11.24%, 4.78%, 3.92%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
