Sponsored by PostMcpAi.

Hopx VS Rivet

Compare Hopx VS Rivet, what is the difference between Hopx and Rivet?

You may like

Summarize

Hopx summarize

Hopx lets you spin up fully isolated Linux micro-VMs in ~100 ms — perfect for running AI agents, notebooks, or untrusted code safely at scale. Each sandbox runs in its own Firecracker microVM, with full state persistence, SDKs for Python, JS, Go, and more. No cold-start lag. No runtime limits. Just raw performance and security.

Hopx Landing Page

Rivet summarize

Rivet Landing Page

Compare Details

Hopx details

Categories AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, AI API, AI Workflow
Hopx Website https://hopx.ai?utm_source=toolify
Added Time November 13 2025
Hopx Pricing --

Rivet details

Categories AI Agent, AI Workflow, AI Developer Tools, AI App Builder
Rivet Website https://rivet.dev?utm_source=toolify
Added Time September 11 2026
Rivet Pricing --

Comparison of usage

How to use Hopx?

Users can interact with Hopx via its SDKs available for Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, .NET, Java, and PHP. The process involves installing the SDK (e.g., `npm install @hopx-ai/sdk`), creating a sandbox instance (e.g., `Sandbox.create({ template: 'code-interpreter' })`), executing code within the sandbox using methods like `runCode()`, and then cleaning up the sandbox. The SDK allows for various operations including code execution, real-time output streaming, file operations, shell commands, process management, and desktop automation.

How to use Rivet?

Install Rivet locally with the Rivet SDK, create durable Actors and workflows, configure agentOS environments for secure execution, and connect your existing frameworks, runtimes, tools, and cloud platforms. Develop locally using the same APIs and control-plane behavior as production, then deploy to Rivet Cloud, your own infrastructure, or a fully self-hosted environment. Use the Rivet dashboard or Rivet MCP to inspect actor state, sessions, workflow runs, and application releases.

Compare Pros between Hopx and Rivet

Core features of Hopx

  • Blazing-fast sandboxes with ~100ms startup
  • Hardware-level security and kernel isolation via Firecracker microVMs
  • Unlimited runtime with full state persistence
  • SDKs for Python, JavaScript, Go, .NET, Java, PHP
  • Execute code, stream output, file operations, commands, process management
  • Desktop automation and real-time metrics monitoring

Core features of Rivet

  • Durable Actors for persistent agent processes, memory, real-time communication, and streaming
  • agentOS environments with secure code execution, filesystems, isolation, and session transcripts
  • Restart-safe durable workflows for multi-step agent operations
  • Dynamic Apps for deploying AI-generated application backends
  • Managed cloud, VPC, on-premises, self-hosted, and air-gapped deployment options
  • Dashboard observability for Actors, agentOS sessions, workflows, and releases
  • Rivet MCP integration for AI clients such as Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor
  • Postgres, FoundationDB, and S3 storage support
  • Integration with React, Next.js, Svelte, Hono, Express, Node.js, Bun, Deno, AWS, Kubernetes, and other tools

Compare Use Cases

Use cases for Hopx

  • Run Untrusted Code safely in isolated microVMs
  • Launch and manage AI Agents that write and execute code
  • Spin up Jupyter notebooks for Data Analysis
  • Develop and run Deep Research Agents continuously
  • Orchestrate Autonomous AI Workflows with code execution and tools
  • Control full cloud desktops with Computer Use Agents
  • Run Background Automations, workers, and schedulers
  • Train and evaluate Reinforcement Learning agents
  • Host Secure MCP Servers in isolated perimeters
  • Execute Long-Running Jobs without artificial runtime limits
  • Coordinate Multi-Agent Mesh across isolated micro-VMs

Use cases for Rivet

  • Build AI agents with persistent state, memory, and durable execution
  • Run agents in isolated environments with secure code execution and filesystem access
  • Automate long-running, multi-step business processes that must survive restarts
  • Deploy AI-generated application backends for end users
  • Operate agent infrastructure inside a private VPC, on-premises, or an air-gapped network
  • Monitor agent sessions, workflow runs, actor state, and application releases
  • Create real-time and streaming applications powered by durable agents

Different Plan between Hopx and Rivet

Hopx

Compute

$0.00001400/s

vCPU

Memory

$0.00000450/s

GiB

Storage

$0.00000003/s

GiB

Rivet

Free

$0 per month

For prototyping and small projects. Includes 100,000 Awake Actor Hours per month, a $5 compute limit, 1 vCPU maximum, 5GB storage, 5 million writes, 200 million reads, 100GB egress, and community support.

Hobby

From $20 per month plus usage

For scaling applications. Includes 400,000 Awake Actor Hours, up to 8 vCPUs, 25 billion reads, 50 million writes, 5GB storage, 1TB egress, and email support.

Team

From $200 per month plus usage

For growing teams and businesses. Includes 400,000 Awake Actor Hours, up to 8 vCPUs, 25 billion reads, 50 million writes, 5GB storage, 1TB egress, MFA, and Slack support.

Enterprise Edition On-Prem

Custom pricing

Self-hosted enterprise features including an Actor control plane, FoundationDB persistence, multi-tenant cloud layers, backups, point-in-time recovery, forking, ACLs, advanced analytics, OpenTelemetry, alerting configurations, Kubernetes manifests, air-gapped deployments, priority support, SLAs, and compliance hardening guidance.

Usage Pricing

Metered

Beyond plan allowances: $0.05 per 1,000 Awake Actor Hours, $0.40 per GB-month of state storage, $0.20 per million reads, $1 per million writes, $0.15 per GB of egress, and compute from $0.0000330 per vCPU-second plus $0.0000029 per GiB-second.

Compare Traffic/Monthly Visitors

Hopx's traffic

Hopx is the one with 3.0K monthly visits and 00:01:06 Avg.visit duration. Hopx has a Page per visit of 2.24 and a bounce rate of 31.18%.

Visit Over Time

Monthly Visits 3.0K
Avg·visit Duration 00:01:06
Page per Visit 2.24
Bounce Rate 31.18%
Aug 2025 - Aug 2026 All traffic:

Rivet's traffic

Rivet is the one with 33.1K monthly visits and 00:00:14 Avg.visit duration. Rivet has a Page per visit of 1.61 and a bounce rate of 42.25%.

Visit Over Time

Monthly Visits 33.1K
Avg·visit Duration 00:00:14
Page per Visit 1.61
Bounce Rate 42.25%
Jun 2026 - Aug 2026 All traffic:

Geography

The top 1 countries/regions for Hopx are:United States 100.00%

Top 1 Countries/regions

United States
100.00%

Geography

The top 5 countries/regions for Rivet are:United States 37.24%, India 21.98%, Brazil 11.24%, Israel 4.78%, Hong Kong, China 3.92%

Top 5 Countries/regions

United States
37.24%
India
21.98%
Brazil
11.24%
Israel
4.78%
Hong Kong, China
3.92%

Traffic Sources

The 6 main sources of traffic to Hopx are:Direct 38.88%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 30.61%, Referrals 10.50%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 5.49%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 3.85%, Mail 3.66%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 2.95%, vs_sourcesGenAi 1.70%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 1.60%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.76%

Direct
38.88%
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic
30.61%
Referrals
10.50%
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic
5.49%
vs_sourcesDisplayAds
3.85%
Mail
3.66%
vs_sourcesAffiliate
2.95%
vs_sourcesGenAi
1.70%
vs_sourcesSearchPaid
1.60%
vs_sourcesSocialPaid
0.76%
Aug 2025 - Aug 2026 Worldwide Desktop Only

Traffic Sources

The 6 main sources of traffic to Rivet are:Direct 37.62%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 29.69%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 19.11%, Referrals 9.20%, Mail 1.80%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.82%, vs_sourcesGenAi 0.56%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.53%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.46%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.21%

Direct
37.62%
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic
29.69%
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic
19.11%
Referrals
9.20%
Mail
1.80%
vs_sourcesDisplayAds
0.82%
vs_sourcesGenAi
0.56%
vs_sourcesAffiliate
0.53%
vs_sourcesSearchPaid
0.46%
vs_sourcesSocialPaid
0.21%
Jun 2026 - Aug 2026 Worldwide Desktop Only

Which is better: Hopx or Rivet?

Rivet might be a bit more popular than Hopx.As you can see, Hopx has 3.0K monthly visits, while Rivet has 33.1K monthly visits. So more people choose Rivet. So the odds are that people will recommend Rivet more on social platforms.

Hopx has an Avg.visit duration of 00:01:06, while Rivet has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:14. Also, Hopx has a page per visit of 2.24 and a Bounce Rate of 31.18%. Rivet has a page per visit of 1.61 and a Bounce Rate of 42.25%.

The main users of Hopx are United States, with the following distribution: 100.00%.

The main users of Rivet are United States, India, Brazil, Israel, Hong Kong, China, with the following distribution: 37.24%, 21.98%, 11.24%, 4.78%, 3.92%.

See other comparisons

Featured*