Wan VS reference to video
Compare Wan VS reference to video, what is the difference between Wan and reference to video?
You may like
Summarize
Wan summarize
Wan is an AI creative drawing platform under Alibaba, offering capabilities such as text-to-image, image editing, text-to-video, and image-to-video for AI-powered artistic creation.
Wan Landing Page
reference to video summarize
reference to video Landing Page
Compare Details
Wan details
| Categories | AI Video Generator, AI Image Generator, AI Art Generator, Text to Video, Text to Image, Image to Video, Image to Image, AI Video Editor, AI Photo Editor, Large Language Models (LLMs) |
| Wan Website | https://wan.video?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | April 28 2025 |
| Wan Pricing | -- |
reference to video details
| Categories | AI Video Generator, Image to Video, Video to Video |
| reference to video Website | https://referencetovideo.net?utm_source=toolify |
| Added Time | September 12 2026 |
| reference to video Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Wan?
Use Wan by inputting text prompts to generate images or videos, editing existing images, or converting images to videos and vice versa. Explore the AI Images and AI Videos sections to start creating.
How to use reference to video?
Upload compatible image, video, or audio references, assign each asset a specific role, choose an AI video model, and describe the desired scene in the prompt using reference tokens such as @Image1, @Video1, and @Audio1. Then select the format, resolution, and duration, generate the video, and review consistency across identity, wardrobe, products, motion, camera movement, and audio timing.
Compare Pros between Wan and reference to video
Core features of Wan
- Text-to-image generation
- Image editing
- Text-to-video generation
- Image-to-video generation
Core features of reference to video
- AI video generation from image, video, and audio references
- Character identity and facial consistency across scenes
- Product, packaging, outfit, and branding consistency
- Motion and performance guidance from video references
- Camera movement control using video references
- Audio, dialogue, music, rhythm, and timing synchronization
- Multi-character reference workflows
- Support for Seedance, MiniMax H3, and Gemini Omni models
- Video generation up to 30 seconds depending on model and settings
- 720P, 1080P, 2K, and 4K output options
- Prompt-based reference role assignment
- Templates for UGC ads, anime characters, fashion, music videos, mascots, and game characters
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Wan
- Generating AI art from text descriptions.
- Creating videos from text prompts.
- Editing and enhancing existing images.
- Converting images into video content.
Use cases for reference to video
- Create consistent character stories across different scenes
- Produce product and person UGC advertisements
- Generate fashion videos with consistent outfits and styling
- Create anime and original character content
- Produce music videos with consistent performer identity
- Create game character and mascot videos
- Build AI influencer and episodic social media content
- Generate branded campaigns with consistent products and packaging
- Create multi-character narrative videos
- Animate stylized 3D characters in game-world environments
Different Plan between Wan and reference to video
Wan
Sorry, there are no data
reference to video
$12 per month
1,500 credits per month, up to 37 videos, 720P, 1080P, and 4K output, videos up to 30 seconds depending on settings, and image, video, and audio references.
$144 billed yearly
1,500 credits per month with annual billing and savings of up to 31%; includes 720P, 1080P, and 4K output plus image, video, and audio references.
$29 per month
4,000 credits per month, up to 100 videos, 720P, 1080P, and 4K output, videos up to 30 seconds depending on settings, and image, video, and audio references.
$348 billed yearly
4,000 credits per month with annual billing and savings of up to 31%; includes 720P, 1080P, and 4K output plus image, video, and audio references.
$89 per month
13,000 credits per month, up to 325 videos, 720P, 1080P, and 4K output, videos up to 30 seconds depending on settings, and image, video, and audio references.
$1,068 billed yearly
13,000 credits per month with annual billing and savings of up to 31%; includes 720P, 1080P, and 4K output plus image, video, and audio references.
Wan's traffic
Wan is the one with 1.7M monthly visits and 00:05:27 Avg.visit duration. Wan has a Page per visit of 5.00 and a bounce rate of 36.52%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 1.7M |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:05:27 |
| Page per Visit | 5.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 36.52% |
reference to video's traffic
reference to video is the one with 0 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. reference to video has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 0 |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
| Page per Visit | 0.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Wan are:United States 14.35%, India 12.40%, Russia 5.64%, Brazil 5.34%, Germany 5.06%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 14.35% |
 | 12.40% |
 | 5.64% |
 | 5.34% |
 | 5.06% |
Geography
Sorry, there are no data
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Wan are:Direct 52.17%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 23.74%, Referrals 13.41%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 6.73%, vs_sourcesGenAi 2.40%, Mail 0.92%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.57%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.05%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%
Direct | 52.17% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 23.74% |
Referrals | 13.41% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 6.73% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 2.40% |
Mail | 0.92% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.57% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.05% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to reference to video are:Mail 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, Direct 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, Referrals 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
Mail | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
Direct | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
Referrals | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Which is better: Wan or reference to video?
Wan might be a bit more popular than reference to video.As you can see, Wan has 1.7M monthly visits, while reference to video has 0 monthly visits. So more people choose Wan. So the odds are that people will recommend Wan more on social platforms.
Wan has an Avg.visit duration of 00:05:27, while reference to video has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00. Also, Wan has a page per visit of 5.00 and a Bounce Rate of 36.52%. reference to video has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%.
The main users of Wan are United States, India, Russia, Brazil, Germany, with the following distribution: 14.35%, 12.40%, 5.64%, 5.34%, 5.06%.
See other comparisons
Featured*
