WeChat Mini Program Development Feasibility Decision Assistant for Openclaw

Ensure Python is installed on your local system, and configure your agent with Openclaw Skills execution permissions.

To generate feasibility reports programmatically, invoke the generator script from your shell:

python ./scripts/report_generator.py \
  --name "Your Product Name" \
  --direction "Brief Description/Direction" \
  --output "feasibility_report.html" \
  --wechat-index '{"score": 80, "trend": "rising", "detail": "..."}' \
  --competitors '{"count": 12, "top3": [], "detail": "..."}' \
  --industry '{"market_size": "...", "growth": "...", "detail": "..."}' \
  --business-model '{"recommend": [], "detail": "..."}' \
  --promotion '{"strategies": [], "detail": "..."}' \
  --development '{"tech_stack": "uni-app", "cost": "...", "tips": [], "detail": "..."}'

Alternatively, import and run the module inside your Python environment:

import sys
sys.path.insert(0, './scripts')
from report_generator import generate_report

data = {
    "name": "Fishing Community",
    "direction": "Social platform for fishing enthusiasts",
    "wechat_index": {"score": 75, "trend": "rising", "detail": "WeChat index showing 30% YoY growth"},
    "competitors": {"count": 45, "top3": [], "detail": "Fragmented competitive landscape"},
    "industry": {"market_size": "Medium", "growth": "15%", "detail": "Steady expansion"},
    "business_model": {"recommend": ["Ads", "SaaS"], "detail": "Dual-revenue strategy recommended"},
    "promotion": {"strategies": ["KOL partnerships", "WeChat groups"], "detail": "Focus on organic social loops"},
    "development": {"tech_stack": "Taro / Cloud Development", "cost": "Low", "tips": ["Verify registration certificates early"], "detail": "Low technical complexity but high policy sensitivity"}
}

html = generate_report(data)
with open('report.html', 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:
    f.write(html)

The decision report is scored out of 100 points based on a weighted multi-dimensional model:

Report Output Scoring Levels

• Score >= 80 (Recommended): Clear market opportunities with healthy competitive index levels.
• Score 65 - 79 (Cautious Proceeding): Viable concept requiring specific differentiation and calculated distribution.
• Score 50 - 64 (On Hold): High risk; requires validating primary market hypotheses prior to development.
• Score < 50 (Not Recommended): Excessive platform audit, technical, or market saturation risks.