Goodnotes VS Daisy
Goodnotes VS Daisy对比，Goodnotes 和 Daisy 有什么区别？
猜你喜欢
总结
Goodnotes 总结
Goodnotes 着陆页
Daisy 总结
Local-first meeting recorder for Mac — and fully open source (Apache 2.0). Records both sides of a call (mic + system audio) with no bot joining, transcribes on-device with Whisper, and summarises with your AI (Anthropic, OpenAI, Apple Intelligence). Exposes a local MCP server so Claude & Cursor can query your meetings — and doubles as push-to-talk dictation in any app. No cloud, no account, no subscription.
Daisy 着陆页
比较详细信息
Goodnotes 详细信息
| 类别 | AI 笔记工具, AI拼写检查, AI写作助手 |
| Goodnotes 网站 | https://goodnotes.com?utm_source=toolify |
| 添加时间 | 2023年12月25日 |
| Goodnotes 定价 | -- |
Daisy 详细信息
| 类别 | AI 笔记工具, AI会议助手, AI语音转写 |
| Daisy 网站 | https://www.mydaisy.io?utm_source=toolify |
| 添加时间 | 2026年6月17日 |
| Daisy 定价 | -- |
使用情况比较
如何使用 Goodnotes？
Download the Goodnotes app on your preferred device (iOS, Mac, Windows, Android, or Web). Create notebooks, write or type notes, import PDFs for annotation, and sync your notes across devices. Upgrade to a paid plan for unlimited notebooks and features.
如何使用 Daisy？
Download and install the DMG for Apple Silicon Mac (macOS 14+). Grant Screen Recording permission to capture system audio. Use the widget on your screen to start recording meetings, dictating text, or capturing voice notes. Transcripts are saved locally as Markdown files. Optionally, add your OpenAI or Anthropic API key in Settings for summaries, or toggle the local MCP server in the Connections tab to let Claude Desktop or Cursor query your meeting logs.
比较 Goodnotes 和 Daisy 的优势
Goodnotes的核心功能
- Handwriting recognition
- AI-powered spellcheck for handwriting
- Cross-platform syncing
- PDF annotation
- Digital notebooks
Daisy的核心功能
- Local-first, private meeting recording (mic + system audio) with no bot joining
- On-device WhisperKit transcription powered by the Mac Neural Engine
- Offline FluidAudio diarization for accurate speaker labeling
- Local MCP server allowing Claude Desktop and Cursor to query transcripts
- Plain Markdown file export to any local folder (e.g., Obsidian vault, iCloud Drive)
- Three usage modes: Meeting capture, voice notes, and push-to-talk dictation
比较使用案例
Goodnotes的使用案例
- Taking notes in class or meetings
- Annotating research papers
- Creating digital planners
- Brainstorming ideas
- Managing to-do lists
Daisy的使用案例
- Record and transcribe Zoom, Google Meet, or Slack calls entirely offline for maximum privacy
- Query meeting history and action items from Claude Desktop using local MCP tools
- Dictate text directly into any Mac application using push-to-talk dictation
Goodnotes和Daisy的不同计划
Goodnotes
$0
3 notebooks
$9.99 / year
Unlimited notebooks, sharing & exporting notes, export documents without a watermark, unlimited file import size (Apple Only), unlimited audio recording length (Apple Only), AI handwriting features (Apple only), AI typing features (Apple only), Interactive Exam practice materials (Apple only), Bonus stickers, templates and digital stationery, Access to Apple, Android, Windows, and Web Editor
$29.99 / one-time payment
Unlimited notebooks, sharing & exporting notes, export documents without a watermark, unlimited audio recording length, AI handwriting features, AI typing features, Interactive Exam practice materials, Bonus stickers, templates and digital stationery, Access to Apple
$6.99 / year
Unlimited notebooks, sharing & exporting notes, export documents without a watermark, maximum file import size 250MB, Access to Android and Windows
Daisy
Free
Free to use during the beta phase
One-time payment
Lifetime access after the official launch with no monthly subscription
Goodnotes的流量
Goodnotes 是月访问量为 2.4M 且平均访问时长为 00:07:33 的工具。 Goodnotes 的每次访问页数为 10.81，跳出率为 31.38%。
最新流量情况
| 月访问量 | 2.4M |
| 平均·访问时长 | 00:07:33 |
| 每次访问页数 | 10.81 |
| 跳出率 | 31.38% |
Daisy的流量
Daisy 是月访问量为 0 且平均访问时长为 00:00:00 的工具。 Daisy 的每次访问页数为 0.00，跳出率为 0.00%。
最新流量情况
| 月访问量 | 0 |
| 平均·访问时长 | 00:00:00 |
| 每次访问页数 | 0.00 |
| 跳出率 | 0.00% |
地理位置
Goodnotes 的前 5 个国家/地区是：United States 23.27%, Germany 10.11%, United Kingdom 6.76%, Japan 5.97%, Spain 3.49%
Top 5 国家/地区
 | 23.27% |
 | 10.11% |
 | 6.76% |
 | 5.97% |
 | 3.49% |
地理位置
对不起，没有数据
流量来源
Goodnotes 的 6 个主要流量来源是：直接访问 51.86%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 34.73%, 外链引荐 6.34%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 4.09%, 邮件 1.70%, vs_sourcesGenAi 1.06%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.15%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.06%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%
直接访问 | 51.86% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 34.73% |
外链引荐 | 6.34% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 4.09% |
邮件 | 1.70% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 1.06% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.15% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.06% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
流量来源
Daisy 的 6 个主要流量来源是：邮件 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, 直接访问 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, 外链引荐 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
邮件 | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
直接访问 | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
外链引荐 | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Goodnotes 或 Daisy哪个更好？
Goodnotes 可能比 Daisy 更受欢迎。如您所见，Goodnotes 每月有 2.4M 次访问，而 Daisy 每月有 0 次访问。 所以更多的人选择了Goodnotes。 因此，人们很可能会在社交平台上更多地推荐 Goodnotes。
Goodnotes 的平均访问持续时间为 00:07:33，而 Daisy 的平均访问持续时间为 00:00:00。 此外，Goodnotes 的每次访问页面为 10.81，跳出率为 31.38%。 Daisy 的每次访问页面为 0.00，跳出率为 0.00%。
Goodnotes 的主要用户是United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Japan, Spain，分布如下：23.27%, 10.11%, 6.76%, 5.97%, 3.49%。
查看其他对比
精选*
