Goodnotes VS Daisy
Goodnotes VS Daisy 对比，Goodnotes 和 Daisy 有什麼區別？
猜你喜歡
總結
Goodnotes 總結
Goodnotes 著陸頁
Daisy 總結
Local-first meeting recorder for Mac — and fully open source (Apache 2.0). Records both sides of a call (mic + system audio) with no bot joining, transcribes on-device with Whisper, and summarises with your AI (Anthropic, OpenAI, Apple Intelligence). Exposes a local MCP server so Claude & Cursor can query your meetings — and doubles as push-to-talk dictation in any app. No cloud, no account, no subscription.
Daisy 著陸頁
比較詳情
Goodnotes 詳細信息
| 類別 | AI 筆記工具, AI拼字檢查, AI 寫作助手 |
| Goodnotes 網站 | https://goodnotes.com?utm_source=toolify |
| 添加時間 | 2023年12月25日 |
| Goodnotes 定價 | -- |
Daisy 詳細信息
| 類別 | AI 筆記工具, AI會議助理, AI語音轉錄 |
| Daisy 網站 | https://www.mydaisy.io?utm_source=toolify |
| 添加時間 | 2026年6月17日 |
| Daisy 定價 | -- |
使用對比
如何使用Goodnotes？
Download the Goodnotes app on your preferred device (iOS, Mac, Windows, Android, or Web). Create notebooks, write or type notes, import PDFs for annotation, and sync your notes across devices. Upgrade to a paid plan for unlimited notebooks and features.
如何使用Daisy？
Download and install the DMG for Apple Silicon Mac (macOS 14+). Grant Screen Recording permission to capture system audio. Use the widget on your screen to start recording meetings, dictating text, or capturing voice notes. Transcripts are saved locally as Markdown files. Optionally, add your OpenAI or Anthropic API key in Settings for summaries, or toggle the local MCP server in the Connections tab to let Claude Desktop or Cursor query your meeting logs.
比較 Goodnotes 和 Daisy 的優點
Goodnotes 的核心功能
- Handwriting recognition
- AI-powered spellcheck for handwriting
- Cross-platform syncing
- PDF annotation
- Digital notebooks
Daisy 的核心功能
- Local-first, private meeting recording (mic + system audio) with no bot joining
- On-device WhisperKit transcription powered by the Mac Neural Engine
- Offline FluidAudio diarization for accurate speaker labeling
- Local MCP server allowing Claude Desktop and Cursor to query transcripts
- Plain Markdown file export to any local folder (e.g., Obsidian vault, iCloud Drive)
- Three usage modes: Meeting capture, voice notes, and push-to-talk dictation
比較用例
Goodnotes 的用例
- Taking notes in class or meetings
- Annotating research papers
- Creating digital planners
- Brainstorming ideas
- Managing to-do lists
Daisy 的用例
- Record and transcribe Zoom, Google Meet, or Slack calls entirely offline for maximum privacy
- Query meeting history and action items from Claude Desktop using local MCP tools
- Dictate text directly into any Mac application using push-to-talk dictation
Goodnotes 和 Daisy 之間的計劃不同
Goodnotes
$0
3 notebooks
$9.99 / year
Unlimited notebooks, sharing & exporting notes, export documents without a watermark, unlimited file import size (Apple Only), unlimited audio recording length (Apple Only), AI handwriting features (Apple only), AI typing features (Apple only), Interactive Exam practice materials (Apple only), Bonus stickers, templates and digital stationery, Access to Apple, Android, Windows, and Web Editor
$29.99 / one-time payment
Unlimited notebooks, sharing & exporting notes, export documents without a watermark, unlimited audio recording length, AI handwriting features, AI typing features, Interactive Exam practice materials, Bonus stickers, templates and digital stationery, Access to Apple
$6.99 / year
Unlimited notebooks, sharing & exporting notes, export documents without a watermark, maximum file import size 250MB, Access to Android and Windows
Daisy
Free
Free to use during the beta phase
One-time payment
Lifetime access after the official launch with no monthly subscription
Goodnotes 的流量
Goodnotes 是月访问量為 2.4M 且平均訪問時長為 00:07:33 的工具。 Goodnotes 的每次訪問頁數為 10.81，跳出率為 31.38%。
最新網站流量
| 月訪問量 | 2.4M |
| 平均訪問時長 | 00:07:33 |
| 每次訪問頁數 | 10.81 |
| 跳出率 | 31.38% |
Daisy 的流量
Daisy 是月访问量為 0 且平均訪問時長為 00:00:00 的工具。 Daisy 的每次訪問頁數為 0.00，跳出率為 0.00%。
最新網站流量
| 月訪問量 | 0 |
| 平均訪問時長 | 00:00:00 |
| 每次訪問頁數 | 0.00 |
| 跳出率 | 0.00% |
地理流量
The top 5 countries/regions for Goodnotes are:United States 23.27%, Germany 10.11%, United Kingdom 6.76%, Japan 5.97%, Spain 3.49%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 23.27% |
 | 10.11% |
 | 6.76% |
 | 5.97% |
 | 3.49% |
地理流量
對不起，沒有數據
網站流量來源
Goodnotes 的 6 個主要流量來源是：直接 51.86%, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 34.73%, 引薦 6.34%, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 4.09%, 郵件 1.70%, vs_sourcesGenAi 1.06%, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0.15%, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0.06%, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0.00%, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0.00%
直接 | 51.86% |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 34.73% |
引薦 | 6.34% |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 4.09% |
郵件 | 1.70% |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 1.06% |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0.15% |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0.06% |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0.00% |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0.00% |
網站流量來源
Daisy 的 6 個主要流量來源是：郵件 0, vs_sourcesGenAi 0, 直接 0, vs_sourcesAffiliate 0, 引薦 0, vs_sourcesDisplayAds 0, vs_sourcesSearchPaid 0, vs_sourcesSocialPaid 0, vs_sourcesSearchOrganic 0, vs_sourcesSocialOrganic 0
郵件 | 0 |
vs_sourcesGenAi | 0 |
直接 | 0 |
vs_sourcesAffiliate | 0 |
引薦 | 0 |
vs_sourcesDisplayAds | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialPaid | 0 |
vs_sourcesSearchOrganic | 0 |
vs_sourcesSocialOrganic | 0 |
Goodnotes 或 Daisy哪個更好？
Goodnotes 可能比 Daisy 更受歡迎。如您所見，Goodnotes 每月有 2.4M 次訪問，而 Daisy 每月有 0 次訪問。 所以更多的人選擇Goodnotes。 因此，人們很可能會在社交平台上更多地推薦 Goodnotes。
Goodnotes 的平均訪問持續時間為 00:07:33，而 Daisy 的平均訪問持續時間為 00:00:00。 此外，Goodnotes 的每次訪問頁面為 10.81，跳出率為 31.38%。 Daisy 的每次訪問頁面為 0.00，跳出率為 0.00%。
Goodnotes 的主要用戶是United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Japan, Spain，分佈如下：23.27%, 10.11%, 6.76%, 5.97%, 3.49%。
查看其他对比
精選*
