Notta VS Handwriting OCR
Compare Notta VS Handwriting OCR, what is the difference between Notta and Handwriting OCR?
You may like
Summarize
Notta summarize
Notta Landing Page
Handwriting OCR summarize
Transform notes, forms, documents and more into digital text with unparalleled accuracy. Our AI-powered OCR cuts editing time and speeds up your workflow.
Handwriting OCR Landing Page
Compare Details
Notta details
| Categories | Transcription, Transcriber |
| Notta Website | https://notta.ai |
| Added Time | April 17 2024 |
| Notta Pricing | -- |
Handwriting OCR details
| Categories | Handwriting, Transcription, Transcriber |
| Handwriting OCR Website | https://www.handwritingocr.com |
| Added Time | April 27 2024 |
| Handwriting OCR Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Notta?
Notta allows users to transcribe and translate speech in real-time, schedule meetings, record screens, and extract useful information using AI summary functionality. The platform also supports the creation of meeting minutes and AI-templated summaries.
How to use Handwriting OCR?
Convert handwritten notes and documents to digital text with unparalleled accuracy from our AI-powered OCR engine.
Compare Pros between Notta and Handwriting OCR
Core features of Notta
- Real-time transcription
- Translation feature
- Support for up to 5-hour-long audio files
- AI Summary
- Scheduling function
- Screen recording
- Meeting minutes
- AI Templates
Core features of Handwriting OCR
- Accurate handwriting to text conversion
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Notta
- Efficient meeting transcription and minute creation
- Real-time translation for global reach
- Screen recording for information reuse
Use cases for Handwriting OCR
- Transform handwritten notes, forms, and documents into digital text
- Save time by speeding up workflow with AI-powered OCR
Different Plan between Notta and Handwriting OCR
Notta
0円/month
Basic features with limited transcription time and file uploads
1,317円/month
Enhanced transcription time and AI summary features
2,508円/month
Unlimited transcription time and advanced features for small teams
要相談
Customizable plans for large-scale usage
Handwriting OCR
$29/month
100 credits/month, Export to plain text, Word
$59/month
500 credits/month, Export to plain text, Word, PDF, Email inbox
$499/month
5000 credits/month, Export to plain text, Word, PDF, Email inbox, Translation, API access, Custom models
Notta's traffic
Notta is the one with 4.5M monthly visits and 00:03:16 Avg.visit duration. Notta has a Page per visit of 3.94 and a bounce rate of 45.46%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 4.5M |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:03:16 |
| Page per Visit | 3.94 |
| Bounce Rate | 45.46% |
Handwriting OCR's traffic
Handwriting OCR is the one with 3.7K monthly visits and 00:00:17 Avg.visit duration. Handwriting OCR has a Page per visit of 0.62 and a bounce rate of 21.86%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 3.7K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:17 |
| Page per Visit | 0.62 |
| Bounce Rate | 21.86% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Notta are:Japan 27.36%, United States 12.57%, Brazil 7.70%, India 4.09%, Spain 3.08%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 27.36% |
 | 12.57% |
 | 7.70% |
 | 4.09% |
 | 3.08% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Handwriting OCR are:United States 25.68%, India 15.89%, Philippines 14.00%, Australia 13.60%, Austria 11.11%
Top 5 Countries/regions
| 25.68% |
| 15.89% |
 | 14.00% |
 | 13.60% |
 | 11.11% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Notta are: Search 69.43%, Direct 27.49%, Referrals 1.19%, Display Ads 0.70%, Social 0.70%, Mail 0.50%
Search | 69.43% |
Direct | 27.49% |
Referrals | 1.19% |
Display Ads | 0.70% |
Social | 0.70% |
Mail | 0.50% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Handwriting OCR are: Social 62.33%, Referrals 18.44%, Search 11.12%, Direct 8.11%, Mail 0.00%, Display Ads 0.00%
Social | 62.33% |
Referrals | 18.44% |
Search | 11.12% |
Direct | 8.11% |
Mail | 0.00% |
Display Ads | 0.00% |
Which is better: Notta or Handwriting OCR?
Notta might be a bit more popular than Handwriting OCR.As you can see, Notta has 4.5M monthly visits, while Handwriting OCR has 3.7K monthly visits. So more people choose Notta. So the odds are that people will recommend Notta more on social platforms.
Notta has an Avg.visit duration of 00:03:16, while Handwriting OCR has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:17. Also, Notta has a page per visit of 3.94 and a Bounce Rate of 45.46%. Handwriting OCR has a page per visit of 0.62 and a Bounce Rate of 21.86%.
The main users of Notta are Japan, United States, Brazil, India, Spain, with the following distribution: 27.36%, 12.57%, 7.70%, 4.09%, 3.08%.
The main users of Handwriting OCR are United States, India, Philippines, Australia, Austria, with the following distribution: 25.68%, 15.89%, 14.00%, 13.60%, 11.11%.
See other comparisons
Most people like
31.09% 25.50%
