Swiftink VS Press Ranger
Compare Swiftink VS Press Ranger, what is the difference between Swiftink and Press Ranger?
You may like
Summarize
Swiftink summarize
Transcription 3.0, with Swiftink.io domain-aware speech-to-text! Create high-quality text transcriptions from any media file, on any device. Best-in-class ASR via OpenAI Whisper.
Swiftink Landing Page
Press Ranger summarize
Press Ranger is an AI-powered PR tool that makes getting media coverage painless. - Database of 500,000+ Journalists and Publishers - Automatically identify pitch requests from all over the web - AI tools to create media lists and run outreach
Press Ranger Landing Page
Compare Details
Swiftink details
| Categories | Transcription, Speech-to-Text, Transcriber, AI Speech Recognition |
| Swiftink Website | https://swiftink.io |
| Added Time | March 23 2024 |
| Swiftink Pricing | -- |
Press Ranger details
| Categories | AI SEO Assistant |
| Press Ranger Website | https://pressranger.com |
| Added Time | April 27 2024 |
| Press Ranger Pricing | -- |
Comparison of usage
How to use Swiftink?
1. Upload your audio or video file. 2. Swiftink will transcribe it into text. 3. Download the transcript.
How to use Press Ranger?
Sign up, select a plan, access journalist database, create media lists, pitch journalists, track analytics
Compare Pros between Swiftink and Press Ranger
Core features of Swiftink
- Blazing Fast Transcription
- Domain-Aware Capabilities
- Support for 95+ Languages
Core features of Press Ranger
- Database of 500,000+ Journalists and Publishers
- Automatically identify pitch requests
- AI tools for creating media lists and outreach
Compare Use Cases
Use cases for Swiftink
- Medical Practitioners: Transcribe patient consultations.
- Business Professionals: Convert meeting recordings into searchable text.
- Academics: Create transcripts of lectures and presentations.
Use cases for Press Ranger
- Building media lists
- Pitching journalists
- Automated press release distribution
Different Plan between Swiftink and Press Ranger
Swiftink
Sorry, there are no data
Press Ranger
Monthly Annual Save up to 50%
500,000+ Journalist profiles, 100,000+ Publishers, CRM, AI media campaigns, AI-written emails, CSV Exports
$79/year/month
500,000+ journalist profiles, 160,000 media publisher profiles, CRM, Complete contact information, AI-written emails, Unlimited AI media campaigns, CSV Exports
$149/year/month
500,000+ journalist profiles, 160,000 media publisher profiles, CRM, Complete contact information, AI-written emails, Unlimited AI media campaigns, Export 750 records per month
Swiftink's traffic
Swiftink is the one with 2.7K monthly visits and 00:03:29 Avg.visit duration. Swiftink has a Page per visit of 2.00 and a bounce rate of 7.19%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 2.7K |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:03:29 |
| Page per Visit | 2.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 7.19% |
Press Ranger's traffic
Press Ranger is the one with 0 monthly visits and 00:00:00 Avg.visit duration. Press Ranger has a Page per visit of 0.00 and a bounce rate of 0.00%.
Visit Over Time
| Monthly Visits | 0 |
| Avg·visit Duration | 00:00:00 |
| Page per Visit | 0.00 |
| Bounce Rate | 0.00% |
Geography
The top 5 countries/regions for Swiftink are:United States 29.97%, Spain 24.88%, India 15.44%, Germany 9.44%, China 8.48%
Top 5 Countries/regions
 | 29.97% |
 | 24.88% |
 | 15.44% |
 | 9.44% |
 | 8.48% |
Geography
The top 1 countries/regions for Press Ranger are:France 100.00%
Top 1 Countries/regions
 | 100.00% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Swiftink are: Direct 100.00%, Mail 0.00%, Search 0.00%, Social 0.00%, Referrals 0.00%, Display Ads 0.00%
Direct | 100.00% |
Mail | 0.00% |
Search | 0.00% |
Social | 0.00% |
Referrals | 0.00% |
Display Ads | 0.00% |
Traffic Sources
The 6 main sources of traffic to Press Ranger are: Referrals 100.00%, Mail 0.00%, Direct 0.00%, Search 0.00%, Social 0.00%, Display Ads 0.00%
Referrals | 100.00% |
Mail | 0.00% |
Direct | 0.00% |
Search | 0.00% |
Social | 0.00% |
Display Ads | 0.00% |
Which is better: Swiftink or Press Ranger?
Swiftink might be a bit more popular than Press Ranger.As you can see, Swiftink has 2.7K monthly visits, while Press Ranger has 0 monthly visits. So more people choose Swiftink. So the odds are that people will recommend Swiftink more on social platforms.
Swiftink has an Avg.visit duration of 00:03:29, while Press Ranger has an Avg.visit duration of 00:00:00. Also, Swiftink has a page per visit of 2.00 and a Bounce Rate of 7.19%. Press Ranger has a page per visit of 0.00 and a Bounce Rate of 0.00%.
The main users of Swiftink are United States, Spain, India, Germany, China, with the following distribution: 29.97%, 24.88%, 15.44%, 9.44%, 8.48%.
The main users of Press Ranger are France, with the following distribution: 100.00%.
See other comparisons
Most people like
34.73% 9.61%
58.10%