AMD's R5 4500 CPU Review: A Disappointing Performance

AMD's R5 4500 CPU Review: A Disappointing Performance

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Specifications of the R5 4500
3. Performance in Rainbow Six Siege
4. Performance in F1 2021
5. Performance in Counter Strike: Global Offensive
6. Performance in Red Dead Redemption 2
7. Performance in Far Cry 6
8. Rendering Performance in Blender Cycles
9. Video Editing Performance in Adobe Premiere
10. Image Editing Performance in Adobe Photoshop
11. Code Compiling Performance in Chromium
12. Power Consumption
13. Conclusion

📷 Introduction

In this article, we will be reviewing the AMD R5 4500 CPU. This processor has been generating quite a buzz in the tech community due to its unique approach to product design. However, is it really as innovative as it seems? We will take a deep dive into its specifications and performance to determine if it's worth your time and investment.

📋 Specifications of the R5 4500

The AMD R5 4500 is a six-core, twelve-thread CPU based on the Zen 2 architecture. It boasts a base frequency of 3.6 GHz and a boost frequency of 4.1 GHz. Unlike other AMD processors, the R5 4500 utilizes a monolithic die rather than chiplets, making it a repurposed silicon from failed APUs. With only 11 MB of cache and a TDP of 65W, let's see how this CPU performs in various tasks compared to its competitors.

🎮 Performance in Rainbow Six Siege

Rainbow Six Siege is known for its demanding CPU requirements. The R5 4500 managed an average of 363 FPS, with lows dropping to 241 FPS. However, the Intel i3-12100F not only outperformed the R5 4500 with an average of 421 FPS but also came at a lower price point. This raises concerns about the value proposition of the R5 4500.

🏎️ Performance in F1 2021

Moving on to F1 2021, the R5 4500 showcased underwhelming performance yet again. It lagged behind the R5 3600, which has been around for quite some time and is available at a similar price point. The i3-12100F once again outperformed the R5 4500 by 21 average FPS, further questioning its value.

🔫 Performance in Counter Strike: Global Offensive

Counter Strike: Global Offensive is a popular Game known for its high frame rates. The R5 4500 achieved an average of 192 FPS, finally surpassing AMD's own older CPU, the R7 2700X. However, the i3-12100F outshined the R5 4500 with an astonishing 30 average FPS lead at a lower price.

🌵 Performance in Red Dead Redemption 2

Even in graphically demanding games like Red Dead Redemption 2, the R5 4500 fell short. It trailed behind the R5 3600, a four-year-old CPU, and the i3-12100F, showcasing a consistent trend of underperformance.

🎮 Performance in Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6 posed a similar challenge for the R5 4500, with an average of 99 FPS. The i3-12100F once again took the lead with a 20 average FPS advantage. These results indicate that the R5 4500 fails to deliver quality performance across multiple game titles.

🔬 Rendering Performance in Blender Cycles

Switching gears to productivity tasks, the R5 4500 was tested in Blender Cycles rendering. It took 25 minutes to complete the render, slightly worse than the R5 3600. The i3-12100F, despite being inferior in gaming performance, outperformed the R5 4500 in this Scenario as well.

🖥️ Video Editing Performance in Adobe Premiere

Adobe Premiere is a widely used software for video editing. When tested, the R5 4500 obtained an aggregate score of 614 points in scrubbing, rendering, and filtering. However, the R5 3600 once again showcased better performance with a 6.2% lead, and the R7 2700X led by 15%.

🎨 Image Editing Performance in Adobe Photoshop

In Adobe Photoshop, the R5 4500 scored 795 points. However, it fell short compared to the R5 3600, which led with a 9% margin. Surprisingly, the i3-12100F made a comeback, outperforming the R5 4500 by an astounding 21% in various Photoshop functions.

💻 Code Compiling Performance in Chromium

Code compiling is an important task for developers. In this test, the R5 4500 came just behind the i3-12100F in terms of time required to complete the compile. The R5 3600 once again demonstrated a significant advantage, reducing compile times by 21%.

⚡ Power Consumption

The power consumption of the R5 4500 during an all-core Blender workload was measured to be around 52 watts. This puts it on par with the i3-12100F. However, with its lackluster performance, it becomes evident that the R5 4500 offers no significant value.

🏁 Conclusion

After thoroughly reviewing the AMD R5 4500, it becomes clear that this CPU fails to deliver on its promises. The underwhelming performance across various gaming and productivity tasks, coupled with its similar price point to the i3-12100F, raises doubts about its value. AMD's decision to release this monolithic die as a product only damages its reputation and credibility. It is crucial for AMD to Refocus its efforts and strive for better products to maintain its position in the market.

Highlights

• The AMD R5 4500 falls short in both gaming and productivity tasks.
• Its underperformance compared to the lower-priced i3-12100F questions its value proposition.
• AMD's decision to release repurposed silicon as a product damages its reputation.
• The R5 4500 lacks the innovation and quality that AMD has been known for.
• It is essential for AMD to refocus its efforts to maintain its position in the market.

FAQ

Q: Can the R5 4500 be considered a budget CPU? A: While the R5 4500 is priced similarly to budget CPUs, such as the i3-12100F, its performance does not justify its cost.

Q: What are the alternatives to the R5 4500? A: For budget-conscious consumers, the i3-12100F offers better performance and value for money compared to the R5 4500.

Q: Is the R5 4500 suitable for gaming? A: The R5 4500's performance in gaming falls behind both older AMD CPUs and its Intel counterpart, making it a suboptimal choice for gamers.

Resources:

• Lexar's Hades RGB RAM: link